I'm not implying anything, other than what I actually said.I think he's being hypersensitive, overly dramatic, narcissistic, simplistic, tribal, and a little crazy. Just like the other end.Then we agree! Cool!I'm not upset. I've discussed the similarities in what is occurring in both parties many times myself.
Indeed, I just did so again.
.
Do you think that his complaint is valid? Do you think that he is aware of the irony of complaining about the media?
But, by all means, I do love having you defend him. The first line of my sig, demonstrated for the zillionth time.
.
The guy made a valid point. Possibly even a correct point. Just because he is my political and ideological enemy, does not mean that I cannot, or should not be able to see that.
You seem to think that there pointing out that I defended him, is some type of "zinger" that you landed on me.
If the Democratic Party Leadership and the Media, worked together to dishonestly effect the primaries, then people like Uygur have a valid complaint to make about that.
It is not crazy conspiracy theory to think that that could happen. As you seem to be implying.
Anything else? This is boring.
.
You didn't say much. And you certainly implied plenty. This is not boring.
This event reflects important light on the claims of the Right about the way the Democratic Party and the media has been operating for quite some time.
That the far left can see it, when the same tactics are employed against them, validates the complaints that we conservatives have been making for years.
That you are too dispirited to address this seriously, is unfortunate. This is an important potential learning opportunity for you, that you will squander.
I am sorry for the role I played in making you what you are now. I don't know what I could have done better.