Annie
Diamond Member
- Nov 22, 2003
- 50,848
- 4,828
- 1,790
Seems to be what NY thinks is 'helpful'. Anyone agree?
http://www.metro.us/us/article/2009/11/24/08/2928-82/index.xml
At site you can see that there are lots of 'kitchens' that cannot feed the hungry, by law they should throw away foods with 'transfats?' Hey I avoid them, I'm assuming most do. On the other hand, 'transfat friend chicken or no food?' I'd take that chicken.
http://www.metro.us/us/article/2009/11/24/08/2928-82/index.xml
Hungry, sure, but food is healthier
METRO/AZ
When a small church comes to the Bowery Mission bearing fried chicken with trans fat, unwittingly breaking the law, they’re told “thank you.” Then workers quietly chuck the food, mission director Tom Bastile said.
“It’s always hard for us to do,” Basile said. “We know we have to do it.”
A Manhattan deli going out of business delivered a pickup truck’s worth of lettuce, sundried tomatoes, hamburgers, sausages and other food to the Holy Apostles Soup Kitchen last week.
With 1,400 meals to serve daily, Operations Manager Michael Ottley was extremely grateful. He didn’t check the trans fat content of the food. But they could lose their license.
Lines at soup kitchens are up by 21 percent this year, according to a NYC Coalition Against Hunger report released yesterday. The city’s law banishing trans fat took effect in July 2008 and touched everyone with Health Department food licenses — including emergency food providers.
Less than 5 percent of donated food still has the artificial fat, Ottley estimated, but he said, “I can’t in good conscience throw away food.”
At site you can see that there are lots of 'kitchens' that cannot feed the hungry, by law they should throw away foods with 'transfats?' Hey I avoid them, I'm assuming most do. On the other hand, 'transfat friend chicken or no food?' I'd take that chicken.
Last edited: