Can Anyone Show Any Negatives Of A United States Of Africa?

[Mr. Ofo Oao]

Peace,

I've heard talk about a United States of Africa...I agree that that would be nice, Africa as a united single power like the United States of America. Can anyone show any negatives of a United States of Africa?

 

[Asclepias]

That wont happen as long as Europeans have a stranglehold on the money game. You realize they were trying to create a Bank of Africa led by Qaddafi and they killed him. It would have sunk our present finance system because their money would have been based on tangible resources that Africa has an excess of.

 

[Pennywise]

Africa is an inherently tribal continent so the idea of "uniting" the countries is as ridiculous as it was to create country of Iraq. More ridiculous, actually.

 

[Mr. Ofo Oao]

That wont happen as long as Europeans have a stranglehold on the money game. You realize they were trying to create a Bank of Africa led by Qaddafi and they killed him. It would have sunk or present finance system because their money would have been based on tangible resources that Africa has an excess of.

Alot of African leaders didn't support bro. Gadhafi, did they? That is too bad if he was trying to form a United States of Africa. Divided, Africa is easy pickings for her enemies. A United States of Africa would have alot of power.

 

[Mr. Ofo Oao]

Africa is an inherently tribal continent so the idea of "uniting" the countries is as ridiculous as it was to create country of Iraq. More ridiculous, actually.

It's not ridiculous. If the leaders could be brought around they would see the power of a United States of Africa.

 

[Pennywise]

Africa is an inherently tribal continent so the idea of "uniting" the countries is as ridiculous as it was to create country of Iraq. More ridiculous, actually.

It's not ridiculous. If the leaders could be brought around they would see the power of a United States of Africa.

 

[Asclepias]

Africa is an inherently tribal continent so the idea of "uniting" the countries is as ridiculous as it was to create country of Iraq. More ridiculous, actually.

It's not ridiculous. If the leaders could be brought around they would see the power of a United States of Africa.

Europeans back corrupt leaders in African countries so they can keep control from afar and claim their hands are clean. What they do is set up a system similar to the check cashing/payday loan scams you see here in the US in economically depressed areas. They give out loans to the people that will protect their interests and then give them more loans to cover the first ones. Until they get rid of that system it will never work because alot of the leaders are bought and paid for.

 

[Mr. Ofo Oao]

Europeans back corrupt leaders in African countries so they can keep control from afar and claim their hands are clean. What they do is set up a system similar to the check cashing/payday loan scams you see here in the US in economically depressed areas. They give out loans to the people that will protect their interests and then give them more loans to cover the first ones. Until they get rid of that system it will never work because alot of the leaders are bought and paid for.

What would bring the leaders out of their corrupt service of their former colonial masters?

 

[Asclepias]

Africa is an inherently tribal continent so the idea of "uniting" the countries is as ridiculous as it was to create country of Iraq. More ridiculous, actually.

It's not ridiculous. If the leaders could be brought around they would see the power of a United States of Africa.

Europeans back corrupt leaders in African countries so they can keep control from afar and claim their hands are clean. What they do is set up a system similar to the check cashing/payday loan scams you see here in the US in economically depressed areas. They give out loans to the people that will protect their interests and then give them more loans to cover the first ones. Until they get rid of that system it will never work because alot of the leaders are bought and paid for.

What would bring the leaders out of their corrupt service of their former colonial masters?

The potential for more money or a change of heart.

 

[Asclepias]

That wont happen as long as Europeans have a stranglehold on the money game. You realize they were trying to create a Bank of Africa led by Qaddafi and they killed him. It would have sunk or present finance system because their money would have been based on tangible resources that Africa has an excess of.

Alot of African leaders didn't support bro. Gadhafi, did they? That is too bad if he was trying to form a United States of Africa. Divided, Africa is easy pickings for her enemies. A United States of Africa would have alot of power.

A United Africa would make everyone else look like they were playing at civilization. Its the richest continent on the face of the earth in terms of pure resources both human and natural. Just look at all the genius that comes from Africa.

 

[Mr. Ofo Oao]

The potential for more money or a change of heart.

I wish that some African leader like Robert Mugabe could get African leaders to see the power of a United States of Africa.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

That wont happen as long as Europeans have a stranglehold on the money game. You realize they were trying to create a Bank of Africa led by Qaddafi and they killed him. It would have sunk our present finance system because their money would have been based on tangible resources that Africa has an excess of.

Always with the "blame whitey" bullshit.

You were born a victim and you will die a victim and that will be your legacy.

 

[Asclepias]

That wont happen as long as Europeans have a stranglehold on the money game. You realize they were trying to create a Bank of Africa led by Qaddafi and they killed him. It would have sunk our present finance system because their money would have been based on tangible resources that Africa has an excess of.

Always with the "blame whitey" bullshit.

You were born a victim and you will die a victim and that will be your legacy.

By the same token you were born a convict and you will remain a convict. That is your legacy.

 

[martybegan]

That wont happen as long as Europeans have a stranglehold on the money game. You realize they were trying to create a Bank of Africa led by Qaddafi and they killed him. It would have sunk or present finance system because their money would have been based on tangible resources that Africa has an excess of.

Alot of African leaders didn't support bro. Gadhafi, did they? That is too bad if he was trying to form a United States of Africa. Divided, Africa is easy pickings for her enemies. A United States of Africa would have alot of power.

A United Africa would make everyone else look like they were playing at civilization. Its the richest continent on the face of the earth in terms of pure resources both human and natural. Just look at all the genius that comes from Africa.

Just too much...

First one has to divide the continent between Arabic and Non Arabic. 2nd most of that "genius" petered out in the middle ages, when islam was a force of maintaining the past, instead of consisting of a large religious fundamentalist contingent.

3rd, most of Africa's Resources are hard to extract.

Finally, European colonization happened other places, like India, South America, China. Those places seem far more advanced than Africa, and they got their freedom around the same time.

Subsaharan Africa has never had a unified civilization, due to the roughness of the central terrain, and a lack of a far travelling sea-going culture.

 

[Asclepias]

That wont happen as long as Europeans have a stranglehold on the money game. You realize they were trying to create a Bank of Africa led by Qaddafi and they killed him. It would have sunk or present finance system because their money would have been based on tangible resources that Africa has an excess of.

Alot of African leaders didn't support bro. Gadhafi, did they? That is too bad if he was trying to form a United States of Africa. Divided, Africa is easy pickings for her enemies. A United States of Africa would have alot of power.

A United Africa would make everyone else look like they were playing at civilization. Its the richest continent on the face of the earth in terms of pure resources both human and natural. Just look at all the genius that comes from Africa.

Just too much...

First one has to divide the continent between Arabic and Non Arabic. 2nd most of that "genius" petered out in the middle ages, when islam was a force of maintaining the past, instead of consisting of a large religious fundamentalist contingent.

3rd, most of Africa's Resources are hard to extract.

Finally, European colonization happened other places, like India, South America, China. Those places seem far more advanced than Africa, and they got their freedom around the same time.

Subsaharan Africa has never had a unified civilization, due to the roughness of the central terrain, and a lack of a far travelling sea-going culture.

Yes we are too much....for you and other silly whites to compete with. Thats why you stive to keep Africa down. Cant wreck the worlds finance with money backed by real resources.

No. One doesnt have to divide anything.. The genius in Africa has nothing to do with Arabs and still exists to this day. BTW did you know there are Black Arabs as well as the original Arabs being black?

Africas resources are not hard to extract. You must be high.

You have no clue about what you are saying. India is a country not a continent retard. Its still a hell hole over there. Same with parts of South America. China has never been colonized retard.

Who said super saharan Africa had a unified culture? Thats what we are talking about achieving. yes they had seagoing culture. Your lack of knowledge regarding that is your issue.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

That wont happen as long as Europeans have a stranglehold on the money game. You realize they were trying to create a Bank of Africa led by Qaddafi and they killed him. It would have sunk our present finance system because their money would have been based on tangible resources that Africa has an excess of.

Always with the "blame whitey" bullshit.

You were born a victim and you will die a victim and that will be your legacy.

By the same token you were born a convict and you will remain a convict. That is your legacy.

You may want to look up the word "convict", it may help keep you from looking so retarded.

 

[Asclepias]

That wont happen as long as Europeans have a stranglehold on the money game. You realize they were trying to create a Bank of Africa led by Qaddafi and they killed him. It would have sunk our present finance system because their money would have been based on tangible resources that Africa has an excess of.

Always with the "blame whitey" bullshit.

You were born a victim and you will die a victim and that will be your legacy.

By the same token you were born a convict and you will remain a convict. That is your legacy.

You may want to look up the word "convict", it may help keep you from looking so retarded.

Why? You told me yourself you were a convict. I know what it means.

 

[martybegan]

That wont happen as long as Europeans have a stranglehold on the money game. You realize they were trying to create a Bank of Africa led by Qaddafi and they killed him. It would have sunk or present finance system because their money would have been based on tangible resources that Africa has an excess of.

Alot of African leaders didn't support bro. Gadhafi, did they? That is too bad if he was trying to form a United States of Africa. Divided, Africa is easy pickings for her enemies. A United States of Africa would have alot of power.

A United Africa would make everyone else look like they were playing at civilization. Its the richest continent on the face of the earth in terms of pure resources both human and natural. Just look at all the genius that comes from Africa.

Just too much...

First one has to divide the continent between Arabic and Non Arabic. 2nd most of that "genius" petered out in the middle ages, when islam was a force of maintaining the past, instead of consisting of a large religious fundamentalist contingent.

3rd, most of Africa's Resources are hard to extract.

Finally, European colonization happened other places, like India, South America, China. Those places seem far more advanced than Africa, and they got their freedom around the same time.

Subsaharan Africa has never had a unified civilization, due to the roughness of the central terrain, and a lack of a far travelling sea-going culture.

Yes we are too much....for you and other silly whites to compete with. Thats why you stive to keep Africa down. Cant wreck the worlds finance with money backed by real resources.

No. One doesnt have to divide anything.. The genius in Africa has nothing to do with Arabs and still exists to this day. BTW did you know there are Black Arabs as well as the original Arabs being black?

Africas resources are not hard to extract. You must be high.

You have no clue about what you are saying. India is a country not a continent retard. Its still a hell hole over there. Same with parts of South America. China has never been colonized retard.

Who said super saharan Africa had a unified culture? Thats what we are talking about achieving. yes they had seagoing culture. Your lack of knowledge regarding that is your issue.

Western imperialism in Asia - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

as for the rest of your post...

 

[Asclepias]

That wont happen as long as Europeans have a stranglehold on the money game. You realize they were trying to create a Bank of Africa led by Qaddafi and they killed him. It would have sunk or present finance system because their money would have been based on tangible resources that Africa has an excess of.

Alot of African leaders didn't support bro. Gadhafi, did they? That is too bad if he was trying to form a United States of Africa. Divided, Africa is easy pickings for her enemies. A United States of Africa would have alot of power.

A United Africa would make everyone else look like they were playing at civilization. Its the richest continent on the face of the earth in terms of pure resources both human and natural. Just look at all the genius that comes from Africa.

Just too much...

First one has to divide the continent between Arabic and Non Arabic. 2nd most of that "genius" petered out in the middle ages, when islam was a force of maintaining the past, instead of consisting of a large religious fundamentalist contingent.

3rd, most of Africa's Resources are hard to extract.

Finally, European colonization happened other places, like India, South America, China. Those places seem far more advanced than Africa, and they got their freedom around the same time.

Subsaharan Africa has never had a unified civilization, due to the roughness of the central terrain, and a lack of a far travelling sea-going culture.

Yes we are too much....for you and other silly whites to compete with. Thats why you stive to keep Africa down. Cant wreck the worlds finance with money backed by real resources.

No. One doesnt have to divide anything.. The genius in Africa has nothing to do with Arabs and still exists to this day. BTW did you know there are Black Arabs as well as the original Arabs being black?

Africas resources are not hard to extract. You must be high.

You have no clue about what you are saying. India is a country not a continent retard. Its still a hell hole over there. Same with parts of South America. China has never been colonized retard.

Who said super saharan Africa had a unified culture? Thats what we are talking about achieving. yes they had seagoing culture. Your lack of knowledge regarding that is your issue.

Western imperialism in Asia - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

as for the rest of your post...

Imperialism is not colonization retard. Go get a dictionary. There was never a european power that controlled China. Thats why they were able to shake off the negative influences of Europe.

 

[martybegan]

Alot of African leaders didn't support bro. Gadhafi, did they? That is too bad if he was trying to form a United States of Africa. Divided, Africa is easy pickings for her enemies. A United States of Africa would have alot of power.

A United Africa would make everyone else look like they were playing at civilization. Its the richest continent on the face of the earth in terms of pure resources both human and natural. Just look at all the genius that comes from Africa.

Just too much...

First one has to divide the continent between Arabic and Non Arabic. 2nd most of that "genius" petered out in the middle ages, when islam was a force of maintaining the past, instead of consisting of a large religious fundamentalist contingent.

3rd, most of Africa's Resources are hard to extract.

Finally, European colonization happened other places, like India, South America, China. Those places seem far more advanced than Africa, and they got their freedom around the same time.

Subsaharan Africa has never had a unified civilization, due to the roughness of the central terrain, and a lack of a far travelling sea-going culture.

Yes we are too much....for you and other silly whites to compete with. Thats why you stive to keep Africa down. Cant wreck the worlds finance with money backed by real resources.

No. One doesnt have to divide anything.. The genius in Africa has nothing to do with Arabs and still exists to this day. BTW did you know there are Black Arabs as well as the original Arabs being black?

Africas resources are not hard to extract. You must be high.

You have no clue about what you are saying. India is a country not a continent retard. Its still a hell hole over there. Same with parts of South America. China has never been colonized retard.

Who said super saharan Africa had a unified culture? Thats what we are talking about achieving. yes they had seagoing culture. Your lack of knowledge regarding that is your issue.

Western imperialism in Asia - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

as for the rest of your post...

Imperialism is not colonization retard. Go get a dictionary. There was never a european power that controlled China. Thats why they were able to shake off the negative influences of Europe.

China's defeat at the hands of Japan was another trigger for future aggressive actions by Western powers. In 1897, Germanydemanded and was given a set of exclusive mining and railroad rights in Shandong province. Russia obtained access toDairen and Port Arthur and the right to build a railroad across Manchuria, thereby achieving complete domination over a large portion of northwestern China. The United Kingdom and France also received a number of concessions. At this time, much of China was divided up into "spheres of influence": Germany dominated Jiaozhou (Kiaochow) Bay, Shandong, and the Huang He (Hwang-Ho) valley; Russia dominated the Liaodong Peninsula and Manchuria; the United Kingdom dominated Weihaiweiand the Yangtze Valley; and France dominated the Guangzhou Bay and several other southern provinces.