Calvin Coolidge born July 4 Hero to tea partiers

[Oddball]

I love reading these posts from these typical arrogant libtrolls actually defending, applauding and cheering for a large, bloated, and oppressive federal government. You want to point and laugh like you would at a 300 pound toothless striper swinging around a pole, but than you see her kids in the crowd cheering her on and you just cry.

The US is the wealthiest country on earth, is the most powerful military force and has over 300 million people. To claim we can govern a country as complex as the US with "small government" is naive.

Wow....Bromide much?

 

[The T]

Wrong again, tovarich.

What you're describing is the exact mobocratic anarchy that the republic was formed to protect against.

Just and right rules of law don't "swing from left to right", like some cheap cat house trollop.

Afraid they do Dudester....There are no absolutes in law. Times change, judicial interpretations change to reflect the times

The law is not an exact science it involves human beings and it involves interpretations of intent and precedence and justice. If law was a science, you could just enter your complaint into a computer and have it spit out a verdict

Thats why we have humans in the process

Now THAT, ladies and genitals, is the mindset of the true anarchist.

Thanks for your accidental candor.

So therefore by that reckoning? The Constitution had been abolished. Gee? Why weren't we told? Guess that all law(s) are hereby null/void since they are supposed to be based on The same Constitution?

Anarchy indeed.

 

[Oddball]

Afraid they do Dudester....There are no absolutes in law. Times change, judicial interpretations change to reflect the times

The law is not an exact science it involves human beings and it involves interpretations of intent and precedence and justice. If law was a science, you could just enter your complaint into a computer and have it spit out a verdict

Thats why we have humans in the process

Now THAT, ladies and genitals, is the mindset of the true anarchist.

Thanks for your accidental candor.

No problem Dudester..

That is the way judicial systems work and have for thousands of years

Good luck with your fantasy utopia

Actually, it's not.

And your puerile Utopia jab just goes to show that you really have NFI.

 

[Dante]

Calvin Coolidge, born July 4: Hero to tea partiers Breaking News The Herald Bulletin

They are building a museum in his honor. With his austerity, shouldn't they instead donate they money raised to...I don't know...BP or something?

Coolidge was the last president who truly practiced limited government the way the Founders intended.

your status as an idiot has not changed, eh?

The Founders founded the strong Federal Government. They did this when they rewrote the US Articles of Confederation as the US Constitution.

 

[Oddball]

I thought you ran away to the circus forever.

 

[Dante]

The courts, as well as our elected government swings on a pendulum from left to right. A series of decisions will favor the left, new judges will be appointed and new decisions will modify previous decisions and swing to the right.
Amazingly, they eventually get it right and our system of government has been working for over 225 years.

God Bless America! Doesn't get any better than this does it Dude?

Wrong again, tovarich.

What you're describing is the exact mobocratic anarchy that the republic was formed to protect against.

Just and right rules of law don't "swing from left to right", like some cheap cat house trollop.

Afraid they do Dudester....There are no absolutes in law. Times change, judicial interpretations change to reflect the times

The law is not an exact science it involves human beings and it involves interpretations of intent and precedence and justice. If law was a science, you could just enter your complaint into a computer and have it spit out a verdict

Thats why we have humans in the process

Be kind. You can't expect dope smoking idjits and others of limited intelligence to easily grasp obvious facts.

 

[Greenbeard]

Why do states have their own Constitution and same form of government as the United States?

Perhaps because Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution guarantees that they will.

Nice non-answer.


For what purpose?...What's the desired outcome?

In Madison's words:

"...the superintending government ought clearly to possess authority to defend the system against aristocratic or monarchial innovations. The more intimate the nature of such a union may be, the greater interest have the members in the political institutions of each other; and the greater right to insist that the forms of government under which the compact was entered into should be substantially maintained. But a right implies a remedy; and where else could the remedy be deposited, than where it is deposited by the Constitution? Governments of dissimilar principles and forms have been found less adapted to a federal coalition of any sort, than those of a kindred nature."​

 

[Oddball]

Right....Instead of Googling and copy-n-pasting something you probably don't even comprehend, how 'bout coming up with something out of your own head, for a change?

 

[Dante]

I thought you ran away to the circus forever.

Naw, the kinfolk (not mine, some people you may know) over there made people here seem tolerable.

 

[Oddball]

Either that or you just got a new 'scrip of Prozac....I'm guessing it's that.

 

[Dante]

Perhaps because Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution guarantees that they will.

Nice non-answer.


For what purpose?...What's the desired outcome?

In Madison's words:

"...the superintending government ought clearly to possess authority to defend the system against aristocratic or monarchial innovations. The more intimate the nature of such a union may be, the greater interest have the members in the political institutions of each other; and the greater right to insist that the forms of government under which the compact was entered into should be substantially maintained. But a right implies a remedy; and where else could the remedy be deposited, than where it is deposited by the Constitution? Governments of dissimilar principles and forms have been found less adapted to a federal coalition of any sort, than those of a kindred nature."​

thank you for quoting something of substance, as opposed to writing the type of shit that some people here pass off as original thoughts.

 

[Greenbeard]

Right....Instead of Googling and copy-n-pasting something you probably don't even comprehend, how 'bout coming up with something out of your own head, for a change?

If you need the cliff notes, just ask. That clause was inserted because the Founders (drawing from Montesquieu) held that a functional federal form of government required political homogeneity. Every state doing its own thing in this respect wouldn't fly, which is why the feds can disallow alternate forms of political organization by states.

Get it?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Now THAT, ladies and genitals, is the mindset of the true anarchist.

Thanks for your accidental candor.

No problem Dudester..

That is the way judicial systems work and have for thousands of years

Good luck with your fantasy utopia

Actually, it's not.

And your puerile Utopia jab just goes to show that you really have NFI.

Those who disagree with SCOTUS may do so, but should be aware than angry internet posters do not trump the legal scholars on the bench.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Right....Instead of Googling and copy-n-pasting something you probably don't even comprehend, how 'bout coming up with something out of your own head, for a change?

Because neither you nor he are Constitutional experts, Dude, while Madison is?

 

[Jeremy]

No problem Dudester..

That is the way judicial systems work and have for thousands of years

Good luck with your fantasy utopia

Actually, it's not.

And your puerile Utopia jab just goes to show that you really have NFI.

Those who disagree with SCOTUS may do so, but should be aware than angry internet posters do not trump the legal scholars on the bench.

Like;
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, No. 08-205
&
McDonald v. City of Chicago, No. 08-1521
?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Actually, it's not.

And your puerile Utopia jab just goes to show that you really have NFI.

Those who disagree with SCOTUS may do so, but should be aware than angry internet posters do not trump the legal scholars on the bench.

Like;
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, No. 08-205
&
McDonald v. City of Chicago, No. 08-1521
?

The plaintiffs were "angry internet posters"? Really.

 

[Jeremy]

Those who disagree with SCOTUS may do so, but should be aware than angry internet posters do not trump the legal scholars on the bench.

Like;
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, No. 08-205
&
McDonald v. City of Chicago, No. 08-1521
?

The plaintiffs were "angry internet posters"? Really.

I'm refering to USMB's "angry internet posters" and their dribble about SCOTUS rulings.

 

[Dante]

Calvin Coolidge, born July 4: Hero to tea partiers Breaking News The Herald Bulletin

They are building a museum in his honor. With his austerity, shouldn't they instead donate they money raised to...I don't know...BP or something?

Coolidge, a man who ascended to the Presidency by a fluke---he was not initially elected. Think: Gerald Ford.
---

In domestic affairs, he went along with the Immigration Act of 1924, which curbed the number of eastern and southern Europeans allowed into America and excluded the Japanese altogether. He also supported the Revenue Acts of 1924 and 1926, initiated by Secretary of the Treasury Andrew Mellon, the wealthy Pittsburgh banker who favored tax cuts for the rich. These acts freed up private funds that fueled the speculation behind the stock market crash of 1929. To make matters worse, Coolidge fought farm relief legislation that might have shored up the depressed farm economy.

Like Harding, Coolidge allowed his cabinet a free hand in foreign affairs...In Latin America, Coolidge's administration supported economic imperialism. In 1928 Latin American countries were eager to denounce U.S. business practices, and Secretary Hughes was barely able to dissuade them from passing a strong anti-U.S. resolution

Oh the irony! The irony.

---

note: added late....and proof Big Fitz a bigger Ditz::: American President: Calvin Coolidge: A Life in Brief

 

[rightwinger]

No problem Dudester..

That is the way judicial systems work and have for thousands of years

Good luck with your fantasy utopia

Actually, it's not.

And your puerile Utopia jab just goes to show that you really have NFI.

Those who disagree with SCOTUS may do so, but should be aware than angry internet posters do not trump the legal scholars on the bench.

I'm afraid they think they do

 

[Dante]

No problem Dudester..

That is the way judicial systems work and have for thousands of years

Good luck with your fantasy utopia

Actually, it's not.

And your puerile Utopia jab just goes to show that you really have NFI.

Those who disagree with SCOTUS may do so, but should be aware than angry internet posters do not trump the legal scholars on the bench.

legal scholars on the bench

---

I apologize, but I find this to be very amusing.