Thethingsz
Gold Member
- Dec 26, 2025
- 443
- 304
- 158
This is a pattern.
Genocidal Hamas loses on the physical battlefield but wins in propaganda. From irs linked Wikipedians to UN positions.
^^^^
By the 'grace' of Islamic lobby OIC: genocidal Hamas-"Palestine" [Jallad] to win UN so called "human rights" top job.
The 'OIC lobby' and its allies are once again hijacking the United Nations to push a viciously anti-Israel, pro-terror agendaâthis time by installing a vocal defender of Hamas terrorism as a supposed âhuman rights expert.â
On March 31, 2026, the UN Human Rights Council is poised to appoint Palestinian academic Zeina Jallad as Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures. This is a mandate originally cooked up in 2014 via an 'Iran-sponsored resolution', designed not to protect rights but to shield rogue regimes from accountability while smearing Western and Israeli security measures.
Jallad has openly defended Hamasâa designated terrorist organization whose charter calls for Israelâs destruction and whose fighters carried out the barbaric October 7, 2023 massacre, raping, burning, and murdering over 1,200 Israelis and taking hundreds hostage. In her own words, she describes Hamas as a legitimate âpolitical partyâ that âwon the elections in 2007,â dismisses the October 7 atrocities as merely âa revolt,â and claims the real issue is that the world created a âdevilâ out of Hamas to blame it for everything. She laments the âboycottâ of Hamas by Europe and the âblockadeâ by Israel, while conveniently ignoring why those measures were imposed: Hamasâs relentless rocket fire, suicide bombings, and explicit goal of jihad against the Jewish state.
She has justified violence against Israeli civilians as âresistanceâ and pushed to expel Israel from international bodies altogether. This is not human rights advocacy; this is 'terror apologetics' dressed up in academic language.
The Real Agenda.
Israelâs Foreign Ministry rightly called out the selection as âoutrageous,â noting that it exposes the entire process as nakedly political rather than rooted in genuine concern for human rights. A mandate born from Iranian influence is now being handed to someone who whitewashes the very terrorists responsible for the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust.
This fits a long, shameful pattern. The
'Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC)'âa bloc of 57 Muslim-majority statesâfunctions as a powerful lobby inside the UN system, consistently weaponizing human rights mechanisms to demonize Israel while shielding actual human rights abusers, from Hamas and Hezbollah to Iran, Syria, and beyond. Under their influence, the UNHRC has passed far more resolutions condemning the Jewish state than against all other countries combined, including the worldâs worst dictatorships. The appointment of Jallad is the latest example of this inverted morality: 'Hamas terrorists' are recast as âresistance fightersâ or misunderstood politicians, while Israelâthe only democracy in the Middle East defending its citizens against genocidal jihadâis portrayed as the villain.
Jallad even flips the timeline, suggesting we should talk about âOctober 6thâ before October 7th, as if years of Hamas rule, tunnels, rockets, and incitement somehow justify slaughtering civilians at a music festival, in their homes, and on the roads.
Hypocrisy at the UN.
The hypocrisy is staggering. While the UN obsesses over âunilateral coercive measuresâ (i.e., sanctions on terror-sponsoring regimes), it shows zero interest in the real suffering caused by Hamas: diverting billions in international aid to build terror infrastructure instead of improving life for Gazans, using civilians as human shields, and rejecting every peace offer in favor of endless war aimed at Israelâs elimination.
UN Watch has sounded the alarm and urged countries like the UK to vote NO on this appointment. Democratic nations that value actual human rightsânot propagandaâmust reject this farce. Appointing a Hamas defender to a UN human rights post doesnât advance peace or justice; it normalizes terrorism, rewards October 7 denialism, and further erodes the UNâs already tattered credibility.
Israel has every right to defend itself against Hamasâs genocidal campaign. The Jewish state does not need lectures on human rights from those who excuse or celebrate the deliberate massacre of its people. The OIC-Hamas axis at the UN should be exposed and opposed, not empowered. True human rights begin with condemning terrorism unequivocallyânot rebranding it as ârevolt.â
References:
* UN Watch report: âU.N. Set to Appoint Terror Sympathizer as âHuman Rights Expertââ â U.N. Set to Appoint Terror Sympathizer as âHuman Rights Expertâ - UN Watch
* JNS article: âJerusalem condemns politicized, pro-Hamas selection to UN postâ â Jerusalem condemns politicized, pro-Hamas selection to UN post
* UN Watch video featuring Zeina Jalladâs statements: âUN rights nominee Zeina Jallad defends Hamas terror: âHamas is a political party, Oct. 7th a revoltââ â
* Instagram post by diplo.act on Zeina Jallad â
link
Genocidal Hamas loses on the physical battlefield but wins in propaganda. From irs linked Wikipedians to UN positions.
^^^^
By the 'grace' of Islamic lobby OIC: genocidal Hamas-"Palestine" [Jallad] to win UN so called "human rights" top job.
The 'OIC lobby' and its allies are once again hijacking the United Nations to push a viciously anti-Israel, pro-terror agendaâthis time by installing a vocal defender of Hamas terrorism as a supposed âhuman rights expert.â
On March 31, 2026, the UN Human Rights Council is poised to appoint Palestinian academic Zeina Jallad as Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures. This is a mandate originally cooked up in 2014 via an 'Iran-sponsored resolution', designed not to protect rights but to shield rogue regimes from accountability while smearing Western and Israeli security measures.
Jallad has openly defended Hamasâa designated terrorist organization whose charter calls for Israelâs destruction and whose fighters carried out the barbaric October 7, 2023 massacre, raping, burning, and murdering over 1,200 Israelis and taking hundreds hostage. In her own words, she describes Hamas as a legitimate âpolitical partyâ that âwon the elections in 2007,â dismisses the October 7 atrocities as merely âa revolt,â and claims the real issue is that the world created a âdevilâ out of Hamas to blame it for everything. She laments the âboycottâ of Hamas by Europe and the âblockadeâ by Israel, while conveniently ignoring why those measures were imposed: Hamasâs relentless rocket fire, suicide bombings, and explicit goal of jihad against the Jewish state.
She has justified violence against Israeli civilians as âresistanceâ and pushed to expel Israel from international bodies altogether. This is not human rights advocacy; this is 'terror apologetics' dressed up in academic language.
The Real Agenda.
Israelâs Foreign Ministry rightly called out the selection as âoutrageous,â noting that it exposes the entire process as nakedly political rather than rooted in genuine concern for human rights. A mandate born from Iranian influence is now being handed to someone who whitewashes the very terrorists responsible for the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust.
This fits a long, shameful pattern. The
'Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC)'âa bloc of 57 Muslim-majority statesâfunctions as a powerful lobby inside the UN system, consistently weaponizing human rights mechanisms to demonize Israel while shielding actual human rights abusers, from Hamas and Hezbollah to Iran, Syria, and beyond. Under their influence, the UNHRC has passed far more resolutions condemning the Jewish state than against all other countries combined, including the worldâs worst dictatorships. The appointment of Jallad is the latest example of this inverted morality: 'Hamas terrorists' are recast as âresistance fightersâ or misunderstood politicians, while Israelâthe only democracy in the Middle East defending its citizens against genocidal jihadâis portrayed as the villain.
Jallad even flips the timeline, suggesting we should talk about âOctober 6thâ before October 7th, as if years of Hamas rule, tunnels, rockets, and incitement somehow justify slaughtering civilians at a music festival, in their homes, and on the roads.
Hypocrisy at the UN.
The hypocrisy is staggering. While the UN obsesses over âunilateral coercive measuresâ (i.e., sanctions on terror-sponsoring regimes), it shows zero interest in the real suffering caused by Hamas: diverting billions in international aid to build terror infrastructure instead of improving life for Gazans, using civilians as human shields, and rejecting every peace offer in favor of endless war aimed at Israelâs elimination.
UN Watch has sounded the alarm and urged countries like the UK to vote NO on this appointment. Democratic nations that value actual human rightsânot propagandaâmust reject this farce. Appointing a Hamas defender to a UN human rights post doesnât advance peace or justice; it normalizes terrorism, rewards October 7 denialism, and further erodes the UNâs already tattered credibility.
Israel has every right to defend itself against Hamasâs genocidal campaign. The Jewish state does not need lectures on human rights from those who excuse or celebrate the deliberate massacre of its people. The OIC-Hamas axis at the UN should be exposed and opposed, not empowered. True human rights begin with condemning terrorism unequivocallyânot rebranding it as ârevolt.â
References:
* UN Watch report: âU.N. Set to Appoint Terror Sympathizer as âHuman Rights Expertââ â U.N. Set to Appoint Terror Sympathizer as âHuman Rights Expertâ - UN Watch
* JNS article: âJerusalem condemns politicized, pro-Hamas selection to UN postâ â Jerusalem condemns politicized, pro-Hamas selection to UN post
* UN Watch video featuring Zeina Jalladâs statements: âUN rights nominee Zeina Jallad defends Hamas terror: âHamas is a political party, Oct. 7th a revoltââ â
* Instagram post by diplo.act on Zeina Jallad â
link