Annie
Diamond Member
- Nov 22, 2003
- 50,848
- 4,830
- 1,790
Can you help me out with the 'plagarism'? I'm trying to do lesson plans and sift through this stuff...Pg 5???
Bush Assassination?
- Thread starter Ramapo
- Start date
Can you help me out with the 'plagarism'? I'm trying to do lesson plans and sift through this stuff...Pg 5???
jillian
Princess
I'd help you if I could, but to tell you the truth, I'm not sure what he's talking about. So maybe he can tell you what he means. Sorry.
Good luck with your lesson plans. Dinnertime for me. Laterz.
Kagom
Senior Member
I just hope you all remember this is a British film, not an American film.
insein
Senior Member
British film being played at a Canadian film festival and being praised by American Media elites.
Gunny
Gold Member
Kudos. You have finally said something entertaining. Incorrect, as usual, but entertaining nonetheless.
I don't hate anyone; much less for an opinion that conflicts with mine. Perhaps you should try remembering where you are. This is a message board. Words are magnified, in many cases unjustly. Such as you reading "hatred" into anything I post simply because you find it to be an effective label to use when deflecting from having to provide a real answer.
Your comment that I support a one-party system is not backed by ANYTHING I have ever posted. It exists only in your 1+1=3 assumptions. I have no problem with diversity itself. There is no diversity when only one side of the issue gets its one-sided viewpoint continously shoved down everyone's throats; especially, when those viewpoints have nothing to do with reality. Kinda like the accusation you have made in this post.
The TRUE problem here is that people such as yourself view yourselves as moderate when you are anything but. You take the Democrat party line on pretty-much all issues regardless who or what is driving the train.
So the actual situation we have here is you continually choose to label me a "hater" simply because I do not embrace your far-left, in most instances ideology and am more than willing to say so.
In typical one-sided, left-wing fashion, you choose to play this "I don't pay attention to you" role and label me, but I see NO mention of the fact that I have given you positive rep on more than one occasion when, IMO, you have made a good point. Nor do I see an IM telling me that since you don't pay attention to me that I should not be giving you the aforementioned points. But then, there would be some personal integrity involved in doing THAT.
Gunny
Gold Member
I have on several occasions used the term "once proud party" in posts to Jillian, in reference to the Democrats because it is applicable.
Guess she thinks she thought it up, but it realy doesn't matter. It was just a smartass comment that appears to have taken wings.
Dr Grump
Platinum Member
Kagom
Senior Member
I don't condone even contemplating assassinating the president, but I'd be interested in seeing this movie merely for the story and plot. I like the "What If" scenarios and all.
Annie
Diamond Member
- Nov 22, 2003
- 50,848
- 4,830
- 1,790
What if should be left to the future, not bringing future into. This sucks.
Kagom
Senior Member
While I do agree with you, it doesn't help that they've piqued my curiosity.
Bullypulpit
Senior Member
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/...h+assassinated+in+new+TV+docudrama/article.do
Pathetic little flick. We should juston it.
This is the dramatic moment when President George Bush is gunned down by a sniper after a public address at a hotel, in a gripping new docudrama soon to be aired on TV.
Set around October 2007, President Bush is assassinated as he leaves the Sheraton Hotel in Chicago.
Death of a President, shot in the style of a retrospective documentary, looks at the effect the assassination of Bush has on America in light of its 'War on Terror'.
The 90 minutes feature explores who could have planned the murder, with a Syrian-born man wrongly put in the frame.
Peter Dale, head of More4, which is due to air the film on October 9, said the drama was a "thought-provoking critique" of contemporary US society.
He said: "It's an extraordinarily gripping and powerful piece of work, a drama constructed like a documentary that looks back at the assassination of George Bush as the starting point for a very gripping detective story.
"It's a pointed political examination of what the War on Terror did to the American body politic.
"I'm sure that there will be people who will be upset by it but when you watch it you realise what a sophisticated piece of work it is.
"It's not sensationalist, or simplistic but a very thought-provoking, powerful drama. I hope people will see that the intention behind it is good."
The film will premier at the Toronto Film Festival in September and was written and directed by Gabriel Range.
Much as I loathe the little toad, I would never wish such an end on him. If he and his toadies are to be removed, it must be through those mechanisms provided by the very document he so scorns...The Constitution.
Gunny
Gold Member
What's your point? I saw your bullshit statement for the duplicitous game it was. You were hopin gby insinuating like hell but not really saying anythign you might get someone to take the bait and make an accusation you could later deny.
Nothing hard about it.
Dr Grump
Platinum Member
No I did not. The only duplicity is in your mind.
Gunny
Gold Member
Of course it is.:wank:
Would be really nice if one day you intellectual "giants" would realize just how obvious you are.
007
Charter Member
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/...h+assassinated+in+new+TV+docudrama/article.do
Pathetic little flick. We should just
This is the dramatic moment when President George Bush is gunned down by a sniper after a public address at a hotel, in a gripping new docudrama soon to be aired on TV.
Set around October 2007, President Bush is assassinated as he leaves the Sheraton Hotel in Chicago.
Death of a President, shot in the style of a retrospective documentary, looks at the effect the assassination of Bush has on America in light of its 'War on Terror'.
The 90 minutes feature explores who could have planned the murder, with a Syrian-born man wrongly put in the frame.
Peter Dale, head of More4, which is due to air the film on October 9, said the drama was a "thought-provoking critique" of contemporary US society.
He said: "It's an extraordinarily gripping and powerful piece of work, a drama constructed like a documentary that looks back at the assassination of George Bush as the starting point for a very gripping detective story.
"It's a pointed political examination of what the War on Terror did to the American body politic.
"I'm sure that there will be people who will be upset by it but when you watch it you realise what a sophisticated piece of work it is.
"It's not sensationalist, or simplistic but a very thought-provoking, powerful drama. I hope people will see that the intention behind it is good."
The film will premier at the Toronto Film Festival in September and was written and directed by Gabriel Range.
Who's the money behind this crap? Soro's?
A
archangel
Guest
anyone who finds humor or interest in the demise of another human being albeit for speculation...regardless of how one feels about a persons politics...well I'm sorry they have crossed the line and are in serious need of psyhco therapy...Iv'e just about had it with this type of mentality...liberalism is a mental disease...'Quote Michael Savage" whether or not ya like him...this is proff!...( Exception would be the likes of al Zarqawi and the Bin Laden types...who actually committed offensives against humanity)
Stephanie
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2004
- 70,230
- 10,865
- 2,040
But don't forget Arch....
It's only being made to bring about discussion about our policy's here in the United States...
I'M sure it wasn't suggesting that George Bush should be assassinated..
And I'm sure it's not just a hit piece against the United States, And the people who voted for George Bush...
And what I find amazing by the people who don't see anything wrong with this movie. Is that if it's saying anything AGAINST George Bush, then it's AOK....
:tdown2:
It's only being made to bring about discussion about our policy's here in the United States...
I'M sure it wasn't suggesting that George Bush should be assassinated..
And I'm sure it's not just a hit piece against the United States, And the people who voted for George Bush...
And what I find amazing by the people who don't see anything wrong with this movie. Is that if it's saying anything AGAINST George Bush, then it's AOK....
:tdown2:
Jimmyeatworld
Silver Member
I didn't think much of it when I first heard about it. Tasteless, of course, but just another something for the Michael Moore crowd. Even some of them probably wouldn't be interested.
Then I read an article in the Dallas Morning News today. What bothered me was the director and some of his comments. He responded to criticism by saying things like, "Some people don't like it when you open their eyes to truth", and basically talked like the movie was based on fact. I'm not sure how a movie released in the late Summer of 2006 that is set in the Winter of 2007 is based on fact and truth.
I appreciate "What If" scenarios as much as anybody, but this is little more than a propaganda movie with a big budget.
UnAmericanYOU
VIP Member
- Apr 10, 2006
- 389
- 103
- 78
On what level isn't this "docudrama" (a misnomer) not offensive?
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2336960,00.html
Hasn't it been said for over six years now that US foreign and domestic policies have divided the country?Just wait until next autumn!
Then:
Chicago, homebase for mean American criminals. Even worse, he's assassinated in the bowels of a Chicago hotel by a "fanatical sniper". Everybody accusses a Syrian Muslim to have been the gunman, but Bush is really killed by "someone closer to home". Probably Karl Rove.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2336960,00.html
Hasn't it been said for over six years now that US foreign and domestic policies have divided the country?Just wait until next autumn!
Then:
Chicago, homebase for mean American criminals. Even worse, he's assassinated in the bowels of a Chicago hotel by a "fanatical sniper". Everybody accusses a Syrian Muslim to have been the gunman, but Bush is really killed by "someone closer to home". Probably Karl Rove.
Dr Grump
Platinum Member
And it would be really nice if one day you "mental midgets" would realise 2+2=4...
Similar threads
Latest Discussions
-
-
Oklahoma high schools to teach 2020 election conspiracy theories as fact- Latest: OhPleaseJustQuit
-
