Thanks!
If they reject do they critique it? That is always helpfull.
No, they don't. Or at least I assume they don't, I've only submitted once, and I got in. I know when I got in, they never even told me, I didn't know until the day it came out!
I reread the story and I'm kinda pissed now, because I see a lot of problems with it that I didn't see before I submitted it. Oh, well, we'll see. If it gets in, I'll post it here, if it doesn't, I'll edit it some, then post it.
Is this the goal in your life? To write?
Yeah, it is, I've been writing for a long time, but only started thinking about making it a career in the past few years (sort of thanks to Jim, BTW). Honestly, what I'd love to be able to do is to be a writer/director of movies, but I don't know that that'll ever pan out. But, yeah, right now I'm majoring in English with a concentration in writing.
I have this story in my mind I one day will put to paper - and complete (being the key word here). Unlike most of my story telling, it is not morbid, or as morbid as the others are. People who have read it so far say it is a great story but I waste too much time in the begining detailing the scenery. That is my problem...
One of the hardest things to do is to decide what details to put in, and what to leave out. When I first started writing a lot, I used to worry that I didn't include enough details, but sometimes I don't think that's a bad thing. Writers like Douglas Coupland or Dave Eggers do a lot without too much extraneous detail.