British Army chief warns '5 years' to prepare for WW3 with world facing 'new Axis power'

[peacefan]

British Army chief warns '5 years' to prepare for WW3 with world facing 'new Axis power'



General Sir Patrick Sanders warned that whilst Britain's armed forces were strong in some areas, they were weak in others at a time when WW3 fears are mounting.

Remote : Tue, 09 Jul 2024 12:55:00 +0100
Local : 2024-07-09(Tuesday) 13 : 55 : 00
Found via World Headlines on nicer.app

scare-mongering for defense budget increases, or just the plain truth instead?
i dunno. do you?

 

[rampart]

British Army chief warns '5 years' to prepare for WW3 with world facing 'new Axis power'



General Sir Patrick Sanders warned that whilst Britain's armed forces were strong in some areas, they were weak in others at a time when WW3 fears are mounting.

Remote : Tue, 09 Jul 2024 12:55:00 +0100
Local : 2024-07-09(Tuesday) 13 : 55 : 00
Found via World Headlines on nicer.app

scare-mongering for defense budget increases, or just the plain truth instead?
i dunno. do you?

the axis of xi/putin/trump is obviously the totalitarian alliance that reasonable people fear.

i think wwiii on those terms. xi and putin, who with his puppet trump, control the industrial quantities of readily fissionable material might stay conventional to remove excess population without lowering the self esteem of the elite.

 

[shockedcanadian]

British Army chief warns '5 years' to prepare for WW3 with world facing 'new Axis power'



General Sir Patrick Sanders warned that whilst Britain's armed forces were strong in some areas, they were weak in others at a time when WW3 fears are mounting.

Remote : Tue, 09 Jul 2024 12:55:00 +0100
Local : 2024-07-09(Tuesday) 13 : 55 : 00
Found via World Headlines on nicer.app

scare-mongering for defense budget increases, or just the plain truth instead?
i dunno. do you?

When you lack military production and patriotism within your borders, making it easy for enemies to stoke the disdain that exists and fewer willing to fight for their nation, this next war may very well end quite differently than the last.

 

[DudleySmith]

When you lack military production and patriotism within your borders, making it easy for enemies to stoke the disdain that exists and fewer willing to fight for their nation, this next war may very well end quite differently than the last.

Which is why these useful idiots run around babbling about da evul Murkin Impire n stuff. Now even the right isolationist dumbasses are parroting Jane Fonda. They think if we don't have a military then the rest of the planet will love us and leave us alone. lol seriously, they believe that idiot crap. They also think it will save them tax bux and they can then buy more pot and tranny porn n stuff.

 

[whitehall]

We bailed the Brits out in the 1st world war and later in the 2nd world war. If there is a 3rd one they are on their own.

 

[Oddball]

British Army chief warns '5 years' to prepare for WW3 with world facing 'new Axis power'



General Sir Patrick Sanders warned that whilst Britain's armed forces were strong in some areas, they were weak in others at a time when WW3 fears are mounting.

Remote : Tue, 09 Jul 2024 12:55:00 +0100
Local : 2024-07-09(Tuesday) 13 : 55 : 00
Found via World Headlines on nicer.app

scare-mongering for defense budget increases, or just the plain truth instead?
i dunno. do you?

I reckon that dude is too fucking stupid to recognize that they've been importing millions potential hostile belligerents onto their island, as reputed "refugees".

 

[Oddball]

the axis of xi/putin/trump is obviously the totalitarian alliance that reasonable people fear.

i think wwiii on those terms. xi and putin, who with his puppet trump, control the industrial quantities of readily fissionable material might stay conventional to remove excess population without lowering the self esteem of the elite.

 

[DudleySmith]

We bailed the Brits out in the 1st world war and later in the 2nd world war. If there is a 3rd one they are on their own.

lol now there is a pure fantasy.

 

[AMart]

We bailed the Brits out in the 1st world war and later in the 2nd world war. If there is a 3rd one they are on their own.

Rothchilds own a nice chunk of the Federal reserve bank. We never really broke away from them.

 

[DudleySmith]

Rothchilds own a nice chunk of the Federal reserve bank. We never really broke away from them.

Most of those dynastic fortunes are still here, the Rockefellers, Mellons, Du Ponts, etc. are still extremely wealthy. We just never hear about them because they're all private trusts and thus not open to public scrutiny. They're later generations are all products of Harvard, Yale, etc., and most are left wing, and not at all loyal to America. One example:

https://www.wsj.com/science/environment/rockefeller-exxon-feud-ed816647

Mellon family - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

... and Duponts, Hunts, Basses, etc., etc.

How Are the Great-Grandkids of the Richest Gilded-Age Americans Faring?

A financial check-in, several generations later

www.theatlantic.com

A few have fallen by the wayside, but not many, and their falls were mostly from 'Filthy Rich merely wealthy, but then a lot of it is hidden from sight so nobody knows.

Some Rothschildes are stlil doing well, other branches not so well, but none are starving, in any case.

 

[Oddball]

Most of those dynastic fortunes are still here, the Rockefellers, Mellons, Du Ponts, etc. are still extremely wealthy. We just never hear about them because they're all private trusts and thus not open to public scrutiny. They're later generations are all products of Harvard, Yale, etc., and most are left wing, and not at all loyal to America. One example:

https://www.wsj.com/science/environment/rockefeller-exxon-feud-ed816647

Mellon family - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

... and Duponts, Hunts, Basses, etc., etc.

How Are the Great-Grandkids of the Richest Gilded-Age Americans Faring?

A financial check-in, several generations later

www.theatlantic.com

A few have fallen by the wayside, but not many, and their falls were mostly from 'Filthy Rich merely wealthy, but then a lot of it is hidden from sight so nobody knows.

I'll give GW Vanderbilt one thing; he didn't want to be seen in the same light as his idle rich contemporaries....The grand Biltmore was always there as a productive, profit making enterprise.

 

[luiza]

We are in the midst of WW3 and this Blimp warns us that it might start in five years time .

By then there might be few/no human infantry , no navy and no tanks .Unless the Stealth technologies make massive forward leaps .
Wars will be economic and managed by computers and satellites .

MI6 stooge .

 

[DudleySmith]

I'll give GW Vanderbilt one thing; he didn't want to be seen in the same light as his idle rich contemporaries....The grand Biltmore was always there as a productive, profit making enterprise.

The early industrialists were actual managers, unlike the bankers and Wall Street hacks that eventually swallowed everything and squeezed the railroads and other industries to death. Some get a worse rap than they deserve compared to the prevailing standards and ethics of their day.

Some were clearly lunatics and sociopaths, others had a God complex and genuinely thought they could advance humanity. What is odd is how they later gave so much money away, but none of them ever thought to give any of it back to the workers who made it for them.

 

[Captain Caveman]

British Army chief warns '5 years' to prepare for WW3 with world facing 'new Axis power'



General Sir Patrick Sanders warned that whilst Britain's armed forces were strong in some areas, they were weak in others at a time when WW3 fears are mounting.

Remote : Tue, 09 Jul 2024 12:55:00 +0100
Local : 2024-07-09(Tuesday) 13 : 55 : 00
Found via World Headlines on nicer.app

scare-mongering for defense budget increases, or just the plain truth instead?
i dunno. do you?

Tories committed an increase in defence spending to GDP, Starmer is flip flopping as he will probably not reach the first part of the target in the first year. Obviously he's spending money on immigrants, more useless fake police jobs, and trannies. Plus, they'll be robbing the system to line their pockets.

 

[Ringo]

The new commander of the British Army, General Sir Roly Walker, believes that the UK should be ready for war in three years. The high-ranking serviceman sees the main danger for London in the “axis of upheaval”, which, in his opinion, includes Russia, China, Iran and North Korea.
“That's why we've reached this point... by 2027-2028, that convergence has perhaps reached a kind of mutual singularity, and our ability to deal with them separately - with a specific crisis that can be controlled through a rules-based system - I think has diminished significantly,” the general explained.

It's as if the general is saying 'The horror is coming, give me the money.' As if it's not ready now or as if it will help them.
By the way, this is the best: to take quotes of the same NATO official about Russia and China a month apart, made in the period of “give us money” and in the period of “we did not steal your money” respectively. Literally with a period of a month and a half, depending on whether the official is asking for money or reporting, Russia could simultaneously be on the verge of collapse and preparing to take over all of NATO.

 

[Mac-7]

We should take the general’s warning seriously

But unfortunately we wont

 

[Deadstick]

We should take the general’s warning seriously

But unfortunately we wont

Why would i take that idiot seriously? the man should not be making political statements for a start, this idiot should be in a institute for the insane, if those Countries are a threat to us which is bullshit he says five years, why would they give us five years to be ready and what does the idiot think we are going to fight with? our standing army can fit into a football stadium.

 

[peacefan]

i do agree our nuclear deterrence will probably keep us safe from even out of control proxy wars (let alone nuclear war).

i think this general, and also Trump (since yesterday, together with Netanyahu at his Maro Lago home) started lying (or at least exaggerating, which imo is just as bad) about the severity of the threats posed by the (Middle-)East.

 

[Deadstick]

i do agree our nuclear deterrence will probably keep us safe from even out of control proxy wars (let alone nuclear war).

i think this general, and also Trump (since yesterday, together with Netanyahu at his Maro Lago home) started lying (or at least exaggerating, which imo is just as bad) about the severity of the threats posed by the (Middle-)East.

Not one of those Countries he talks about threaten me in the UK or ever have, it's just warmongering tripe.

 

[Mac-7]

Why would i take that idiot seriously? the man should not be making political statements for a start, this idiot should be in a institute for the insane, if those Countries are a threat to us which is bullshit he says five years, why would they give us five years to be ready and what does the idiot think we are going to fight with? our standing army can fit into a football stadium.

I know this is a waste of time, but a nation that is prepared for war is normally not attacked