Bradford to the Eagles, Rams get Foles

Papageorgio

The Ultimate Winner
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
63,292
Reaction score
19,797
Points
2,290
Location
PNW
This is a strange trade, Bradford is injury prone and I doubt will ever reach his potential. Foles has some good games ahead of him.
 
Bradford will be a good backup for Sanchez.
 
Heard a rumor about Murray to the eagles
 
Jimmy graham to the Seahawks
 
Heard a rumor about Murray to the eagles
Edit: Dallas RB
DigitalDrifter might believe that, but the fact is that Murray will go where the $$$s are and the Eagles don't seem to have as many as he would want. The Eagles would profit handsomely if Murray went to Philly.
 
Who says? You? If Sanchez goes down, the Eagles are in a very good position.
 
Foles was 14-4 as a starter, no off the field issues, smart, 6'6", and cheap. Not sure why Chip Kelly was so desperate to get rid of the guy.

I think this damages Foles as a fantasy player, now playing for conservative Jeff Fischer. It makes Bradford a very interesting fantasy player going into next season.
 
Foles was 14-4 as a starter, no off the field issues, smart, 6'6", and cheap. Not sure why Chip Kelly was so desperate to get rid of the guy.

I think this damages Foles as a fantasy player, now playing for conservative Jeff Fischer. It makes Bradford a very interesting fantasy player going into next season.

Not understanding this move at all, Sanchez is no longer a starter. Unless Bradford stays healthy, this could be a bad move. Now, if they make a play for Mariotta, then they can use Bradford to groom Mariotta. I guess we wait and see, but at this time...
 
I'm don't Foles had the upside that Kelly wanted in a starter.

Bradford if he can stay healthy his upside is huge, only an idiot would think that Sanchez is the starter and Bradford would be a back up.
 

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom