Boasberg isn't going away.

berg80

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2017
Messages
33,263
Reaction score
27,121
Points
2,820

Judge Tells U.S. to Help Bring Back Deported Venezuelans or Allow Legal Challenges​

A federal judge in Washington ruled on Monday that the Trump administration had to either help bring back to the United States a group of Venezuelan immigrants who were deported to El Salvador in March and subsequently sent back to their homeland or give them a chance to contest their expulsions in the U.S. courts.

The ruling by the judge, James E. Boasberg, was the latest twist in the long-running saga of the Venezuelan men who were expelled from the country on March 15 under a proclamation by President Trump invoking the expansive powers of an 18th-century law known as the Alien Enemies Act. Mr. Trump used the act to summarily deport the men, accused of belonging to the Venezuelan street gang Tren de Aragua, to a notorious prison in El Salvador where many later claimed they had been tortured.

In the past nine months, the case of the Venezuelans has passed through every layer of the federal courts, including the Supreme Court, on a variety of issues — among them, whether the Trump administration should be held in contempt for having violated Judge Boasberg’s initial order stopping the deportation flights from going to El Salvador.


Some members of the legal community are sticklers for adhering to the principle of due process, and some are not. I'll let you guess which side she comes down on.

1766522387731.webp


Pam is seen here in attack dog mode, refusing to answer questions during an oversight hearing. I hope I didn't give her away.
 
View attachment 1197148

Pam is seen here in attack dog mode

She's hawt. :p

Nothing has changed. SCOTUS already slapped down Boasberg. Boasberg still doesn't know the law. Pam is in charge of all illegal immigrants and every immigration judge in this country. Illegals can be summarily deported without even so much as a See Ya. Boasberg is trying to steal Executive powers and legislate from the bench, both of which are illegal and unconstitutional
 
or give them a chance to contest their expulsions in the U.S. courts.

That is an excellent idea.

Is a 5-minute zoom call going to work for you?
Trump’s immigration agenda is motivated by racism, bigotry, and hate.

Trump advances that agenda by ignoring the rule of law and Constitution – both of which Trump hates.
 

Judge Tells U.S. to Help Bring Back Deported Venezuelans or Allow Legal Challenges​

A federal judge in Washington ruled on Monday that the Trump administration had to either help bring back to the United States a group of Venezuelan immigrants who were deported to El Salvador in March and subsequently sent back to their homeland or give them a chance to contest their expulsions in the U.S. courts.

The ruling by the judge, James E. Boasberg, was the latest twist in the long-running saga of the Venezuelan men who were expelled from the country on March 15 under a proclamation by President Trump invoking the expansive powers of an 18th-century law known as the Alien Enemies Act. Mr. Trump used the act to summarily deport the men, accused of belonging to the Venezuelan street gang Tren de Aragua, to a notorious prison in El Salvador where many later claimed they had been tortured.

In the past nine months, the case of the Venezuelans has passed through every layer of the federal courts, including the Supreme Court, on a variety of issues — among them, whether the Trump administration should be held in contempt for having violated Judge Boasberg’s initial order stopping the deportation flights from going to El Salvador.


Some members of the legal community are sticklers for adhering to the principle of due process, and some are not. I'll let you guess which side she comes down on.

View attachment 1197148

Pam is seen here in attack dog mode, refusing to answer questions during an oversight hearing. I hope I didn't give her away.
Let then challenge it in court
 

Judge Tells U.S. to Help Bring Back Deported Venezuelans or Allow Legal Challenges​

A federal judge in Washington ruled on Monday that the Trump administration had to either help bring back to the United States a group of Venezuelan immigrants who were deported to El Salvador in March and subsequently sent back to their homeland or give them a chance to contest their expulsions in the U.S. courts.

The ruling by the judge, James E. Boasberg, was the latest twist in the long-running saga of the Venezuelan men who were expelled from the country on March 15 under a proclamation by President Trump invoking the expansive powers of an 18th-century law known as the Alien Enemies Act. Mr. Trump used the act to summarily deport the men, accused of belonging to the Venezuelan street gang Tren de Aragua, to a notorious prison in El Salvador where many later claimed they had been tortured.

In the past nine months, the case of the Venezuelans has passed through every layer of the federal courts, including the Supreme Court, on a variety of issues — among them, whether the Trump administration should be held in contempt for having violated Judge Boasberg’s initial order stopping the deportation flights from going to El Salvador.


Some members of the legal community are sticklers for adhering to the principle of due process, and some are not. I'll let you guess which side she comes down on.

View attachment 1197148

Pam is seen here in attack dog mode, refusing to answer questions during an oversight hearing. I hope I didn't give her away.
That face will be seen a lot after the midterms.
 
The corrupt Democrat Party's mass illegal immigration agenda is motivated by their racism and hatred for the White Voters who the want to displace.

The corrupt Democrat Party advances that agenda by ignoring the rule of law and Constitution – both of which the Radical Left hates.
 
Trump advances that agenda by ignoring the rule of law and Constitution – both of which Trump hates.
He certainly doesn't have enough respect for either to obey them.
 
Boasberg zeroed in on the revelations by former DOJ lawyer turned whistleblower Erez Reuveni, including the notorious comment attributed to Emil Bove, who is now an appeals court judge: “According to his disclosure, the Principal Assistant Deputy Attorney General stated in a meeting that if courts attempted to stop the removals, DOJ would need to consider telling the courts, “**** you” and ignore any court order.”

It is, I believe, the first time Bove’s comment has made it into a judicial ruling, and Boasberg didn’t pull punches by redacting the curse word. Then again, Boasberg happened to be the first judge to get the administration’s “**** you” when it defied his orders and let the AEA deportation flights continue despite his orders to stop them and turn the planes around.


Putting Bove on the federal appeals bench is such a slap in the face to Lady Justice it would still be a topic of discussion were it not for the daily outrages coming from the regime.
 

Put Up or Shut Up Time​

A complicated dance is underway in the criminal case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia over his claim of vindictive prosecution by the Trump DOJ, so let me give you the toplines first:

The bad news … We may not get to hear live testimony from three top DOJ officials: Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, associate deputy attorney general Aakash Singh, and acting principal associate deputy attorney James McHenry.

The good news … The judge may not need that testimony to go ahead and rule that Abrego Garcia is the victim of a vindictive prosecution and dismiss the case.

That’s the upshot of a new order from U.S. District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw Jr. of Nashville, in which he scratched the existing Jan. 27 trial date from the calendar and instead scheduled a Jan. 28 evidentiary hearing on the vindictive prosecution claim.


trumples try to make the Garcia case about "libs defending a human trafficker who is here illegally." Putting aside his lack of conviction for any alleged crime I submit this is more about D's wanting justice to be served. Whatever that outcome might be. It's about making sure the regime does not get away with abuses of power and abuses of rights. Even those possessed by non citizens.
 
Boasberg zeroed in on the revelations by former DOJ lawyer turned whistleblower Erez Reuveni, including the notorious comment attributed to Emil Bove, who is now an appeals court judge: “According to his disclosure, the Principal Assistant Deputy Attorney General stated in a meeting that if courts attempted to stop the removals, DOJ would need to consider telling the courts, “**** you” and ignore any court order.”

It is, I believe, the first time Bove’s comment has made it into a judicial ruling, and Boasberg didn’t pull punches by redacting the curse word. Then again, Boasberg happened to be the first judge to get the administration’s “**** you” when it defied his orders and let the AEA deportation flights continue despite his orders to stop them and turn the planes around.


Putting Bove on the federal appeals bench is such a slap in the face to Lady Justice it would still be a topic of discussion were it not for the daily outrages coming from the regime.
if there were Deplorables at war or what you propagandize as insurrectionists, you know he would be dead. That is your lies. You are King George.
 

Put Up or Shut Up Time​

A complicated dance is underway in the criminal case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia over his claim of vindictive prosecution by the Trump DOJ, so let me give you the toplines first:

The bad news … We may not get to hear live testimony from three top DOJ officials: Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, associate deputy attorney general Aakash Singh, and acting principal associate deputy attorney James McHenry.

The good news … The judge may not need that testimony to go ahead and rule that Abrego Garcia is the victim of a vindictive prosecution and dismiss the case.

That’s the upshot of a new order from U.S. District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw Jr. of Nashville, in which he scratched the existing Jan. 27 trial date from the calendar and instead scheduled a Jan. 28 evidentiary hearing on the vindictive prosecution claim.


trumples try to make the Garcia case about "libs defending a human trafficker who is here illegally." Putting aside his lack of conviction for any alleged crime I submit this is more about D's wanting justice to be served. Whatever that outcome might be. It's about making sure the regime does not get away with abuses of power and abuses of rights. Even those possessed by non citizens.

A complicated dance is underway in the criminal case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia over his claim of vindictive prosecution by the Trump DOJ,

Vindictive? Oh my!

He can still get the **** out of the country.
 
15th post
Libs are trying to make the legal case that a human trafficker was treated sternly
 
Libs are trying to make the legal case that a human trafficker was treated sternly
Was he tried and convicted of human trafficking? He hasn't even been indicted for it.

 
Was he tried and convicted of human trafficking? He hasn't even been indicted for it.

He has a deportation order. He'll be gone somewhere soon enough. Here's hoping his wife has dinner on the table on time, given his wife beating tendencies. One less thing for Democrats to cheer and riot over.
 
Back
Top Bottom