Dear PC: the public housing, like the public schools, has been set up and run like a bureaucracy to guarantee jobs and funding contracts without accountability to the public footing the bill.
Historic Example: During the Depression, federal funds and authority were abused to seize 37 acres of private property in the historic district of Freedmen's Town (ironically land that was previously GRANTED to Freed Slaves emancipated in Texas, and now taken back by govt from private owners who fought all the way to the Supreme Court but lost their land) to build public housing which guaranteed paid work for contractors at a time resources were nonexistent. When the War forced all resources to go toward the military effort, the project was allowed to go forward claiming it would be to help military families; so the complex is designated as a national and statewide military historic site because of this, though it was never used to help Vets specifically, just a few tenants who also happen to be Vets.
It took the Civil Rights Act of 1964 before segregation ended and this public housing complex was even open to the poor Black community where this was built, but not until after a lawsuit had to be fought and won. So much for public housing helping the poor minorities! And it took the HOPE VI legislation in 1994-1996 to democratize the management and protect representation and due process for tenants whose rights were constantly violated by rogue public housing authorities who had no check on them to follow the laws, which they didn't. Tenants finally organized and proved several times in court that the public housing authority embezzled or "misappropriated" millions in funding while violating laws and rights of the tenants.
The tenants are still fighting to enforce the laws passed to protect their rights, since they were evicted to prevent them from checking the govt management with a long history of abusing funds and residents to bypass laws for the benefit of their jobs and contracts at public expense (and in this case, destroying irreplaceable national history registered at two sites, both the Allen Parkway public housing which is a landmark to Civil Rights, the Great Depression era, and military history, and the Freedmen's Town District which is also a landmark to the stages of equal Civil Rights for Blacks and for America, starting with Emancipation when the settlement was founded as a cluster of Freed Slave churches, the Civil Rights Era, and now the battle to reclaim the land and rights taken over by govt).
This may be an extreme example, but if you check with other public housing complexes, they have all been used to herd poor minorities around for bureaucrats to keep their govt funded jobs and contracts; and the efforts and legislation passed to free residents up from the cycle of poverty and dependence on govt was CENSORED by govt to keep the system going as is. The efforts the tenants made to lift themselves out of poverty, and become financially and socially independent to get off welfare, included plans to convert public housing into a sustainable CAMPUS with jobs for student interns to provide public and health services for the purpose of GETTING PEOPLE OFF WELFARE. So of course this got censored.
Instead, the housing authority abused federal courts, public resources and authority to evict these residents so the plans and laws could not be enforced, demolish the buildings to redistribute contract money instead of saving an est. $25 million of taxpayers money by renovating the existing units which would have served twice as many families on the waiting list, and block the campus plans (and instead installing their own version which kept the tenants dependent on the govt bureaucrats instead of integrating with surrounding schools to create a system of educating and training residents to become INDEPENDENT of govt).
PC you are right that it is the bureucrats fighting to keep the poor dependent on govt.
What is outrageous here is that the poor residents actually came up with their own plans to become SELF-GOVERNING and independent from welfare; and yet the govt was abused to censor the plans, seize more land to destroy national history instead of preserving the district and the community plans to restore it as a sustainable campus with business development that would support itself, and oppress and violate the people's right to due process, equal representation and protection of interests -- at the expense of both taxpayers' money and national history destroyed by corporate political abuse of govt.
The "poor Black residents" passed federal legislation to fix the problems with public housing
by creating a campus and sustainable development plan for saving national history, and this is how we allow them to be treated - even worse than the former Slaves who originally built the district, who exercised more freedom to develop churches and businesses ON THEIR OWN than the political slaves we are today, waiting for govt and party leaders to save us.
Here is the censored plan:
http://www.houstonprogressive.org/campus94.html
It is linked to a website for restoring Freedmen's Town as a campus for sustainable jobs in Vet Housing, Health Care and taxpayer restitution as a national model for govt reform:
Freedmen's Town Historic Churches and Vet Housing
This same campus model for integrating military facilities with medical and other health services can be used for Immigration Reform by developing secure business communities along the border using restitution for past violations of criminal, labor, and immigration laws:
Earned Amnesty
We cannot change the civil wrongs and abuse of govt in America's colorful political history, but we can use the lessons and solutions to rebuild our economy and save our future.
How many times must our soft-headed...er, soft-hearted Liberals be told that the welfare statistics, e.g., "47 million in poverty,"...are totally bogus.
It is a major ploy designed to accrue votes for the corrupt Democrat machine.
Check this out:
1. "Out-of-towners live large at free shelters
2. The Plaza — and
the city’s homeless shelters. “People pay $3,000 for an apartment here, and
I get to live here for free!” said Michal Jablonowski, 25, who moved back to the city
from his native Poland three years ago and is now staying in a Bowery shelter.
3.
“I have food. I have health care. It’s great,’’ Jablonowski said. “Here,
the city supports you. ....’’ “We get breakfast, lunch and dinner. We have a microwave and TV. They do the laundry for free,” Jablonowski said he
even gets a prepaid cellphone — allowing 1,000 texts and 300 minutes a month — through Medicaid and boasted,
“I’m going to get my teeth fixed.”
4. “The
shelters are really nice. You have clean sheets. You get to watch TV and stay in the warm. Homeless people have it so good, they don’t want to look for a job.’’
5. “You can arrive in your private jet at Kennedy Airport, take a private limousine and go straight to the shelter system, walk in the door and we’ve got to give you shelter,” the mayor fumed.
6. Taxpayers shell out
$3,000 a month to feed, house and provide other services to each homeless person. The
average stay in a city shelter is as long as nine months — although there’s no limit.
7. “Some people in here have it
better than people working 9 to 5, because they’re not paying rent. I’ve stayed in hostels worse. I call this four stars,” said William Sullivan, who came to the city from LA for a job that fell through. “Everyone in this place has a silver spoon in their mouth. You get fed three to
four meals a day, and the food here is great.”
8. “New York is New York! That’s why people come here,” said Amy Kaufman, 41, who is staying in a city-funded Chelsea shelter.
“I go to the library, and I go sightseeing a lot in Times Square and Chelsea. I like it here. “I’m staying here for a while because the housing options are better. Michigan is in a recession right now.”
9.. “Survival in Florida was a lot harder than here. There are a lot more resources here for homeless, especially in terms of housing and finding transitional housing,” said Steve Rios, 49, who came up from the Sunshine State. “I left Florida because the environment of the shelters and
rules weren’t as good. In Florida, they throw you out quick...."
10. Rios, who is staying at the BRC homeless shelter on West 25th Street, says
they give him everything he needs.“We get a cafeteria, a bed and clothing. My case worker is helping me prepare a package for housing,” he said."
For free ?four-star? accommodations, come to New York City - NYPOST.com
This is "FDR-Heaven".....
....the actualization of his 'Second Bill of Rights.'
And, of course.....it can go on forever, as long as those greedy rich pay their fair share.
Right????
Worse are the handouts paid by taxpayers to run these bureaucracies, often mixing in private profit and political gain.
Examples:
1. $15 million in advances taxes paid by the Federal Reserve was supposed to go into preserving historic landmarks and features in the surrounding national historic district where the facilities were built (over a site of a historic hospital demolished and unmarked burials removed for this purpose) Instead the City spent this money on improvements to open up the land for outside developers to move in, so money could be made for corporate interests who influence elections and campaign financing, at the expense of national history which the local nonprofits and historic churches sought to preserve but were told the City "had no funds for preservation."
2. $3.4 million in city grants given to a bogus nonprofit headed by a developer friend of the Mayor at the time (before a conflict of interest was exposed which caused the head of the group to be replaced by someone else so the contract could be maintained)
where the money was used to seize and destroy historic houses and shuffle the money and property to bureaucrats opposed to the residents' plans for preserving the national district through sustainable campus and business development that would end welfare.
3. Est. $8 to $10 million in private profit made at taxpayer expense by selling the historic county hospital AT A LOSS to a developer friend of the same Mayor, who was legally able to demolish the building without following the same laws required of federal govt,
before flipping the land AT A PROFIT to the Federal Reserve. So money was made on both ends of the deal, while laundering property through a private individual to bypass federal preservation laws, thus destroying history and denying the equal protection of local and national interests in preserving the historic community.
And all this time, of course, the govt claims there are "no funds" for historic preservation, or sustainable campus development, while millions in taxpayers' money is made in profits by developers and friends of the Mayor, where all the appointed positions are kept filled by people hostile to the residents' preservation plans.
Can you guess which Party all these Mayors came from whose administrations oversaw the destruction of national Black History in Freedmen's Town at taxpayers' expense? Hmmmm.