harmonica
Diamond Member
- Sep 1, 2017
- 43,841
- 20,027
- 2,300
- Thread starter
- #121
who said the DOJ case wasn't about civil rights???so we both know, cops have a right to self defense......in most of these cases, the cops were using self defense or there is not enough evidence to prove otherwise(sigh), if you think you and I are gonna go back and forth on talking about fuckin murdering white cops, your wrong...find your black boyfriend and have at it, toots!!so they don't have a right to self defense....is this your answer?I have yet to hear of one damned cowardly cop approach a black man with a gun and save himself....on the contrary, these cowards would rather deal with unarmed negro's, its safer that way!!cops have a right to self defense...this is undeniable...so what's the problem???
and they were shooting a criminal.....which everyone has to agree would be very likely to threaten a cop
so, without a doubt, you people have NO case at all--your arguments are baseless and without evidence--as we see in the Stockley case where Obama's DOJ said there was INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
The DOJ case about about civil rights.
The cops are supposed to be trained. Yet, they just say they felt threatened & they get to kill whomever they want.
If they are so chickenshit, they need to take up something else.
Self defense is not killing someone running away. Self defense should require something other than fear.
so, you would let someone with a gun point it at you, if you were cop? you MUST be stupid, if you would
if someone is attacking you, you would not defend yourself?