Bing answers CO2 question

[EMH]

Wrong doofus. You’re still using 1960 arguments. You’re maybe 60 years of dilution behind the effort to make yourself look foolish.

Where is the rest of the atmospheric temp data?

LOL!!

What a MORON!!!!

 

[Dagosa]

Where is the rest of the atmospheric temp data?

LOL!!

What a MORON!!!!

Google NASA

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Nice to have a two man debate without the TROLLS giving you High Fives and harrassing me.

YOU MORON. RESIGN.
`

Did you post the experiment? I missed it. Please repost it

Thank you

 

[abu afak]

• Mar 27, 2023 in this thread.

So you can show us a controlled experiment with 2 containers one with 250PPM of CO2 and another with 1000PPM and the temperature in the second one will be 6C higher than the first?

Are you aure?
Click to expand...

Click to expand...

Is this too difficult for you 12 IQ Jackass!! experiment jar CO2 ?

co2 experiment jar - Google Search

The Greenhouse Effect Experiment and Lesson for Kids​

STEAM Powered Family
https://www.steampoweredfamily.com › the-greenhou...
Apr 14, 2021 — In this experiment we are trapping the carbon dioxide gas in the jar. When heat is applied, the carbon dioxide traps more heat in the jar ...
‎Climate Change Science... · ‎The Greenhouse Effect... · ‎The Greenhouse Science

Greenhouse in a Jar Lab​

Stanford University​

https://earth.stanford.edu › files › inline-files​

Decide on a lab set up as a group. You are designing an experiment that will test the effect of carbon dioxide on the temperature of the atmosphere (air)?. What ...

The Earth in a bottle - CO2 games on my kitchen bench​

The Foster Lab
http://www.thefosterlab.org › blog › co2-experiment
Apr 16, 2016 — There are quite a few experiments that you can do at home to demonstrate this underlying physics (e.g. here). Over the last couple of weeks I've ...


AND videos.

`

`

 

[abu afak]

• May 10, 2023

• Mar 28, 2023

It's CALLED: "Climate sensitivity"... TO CO2.
Threads have been started on it STUPID. (Billy Bob, etc)
It has been spoon fed to you IDIOT
YOU BRAIN DAMAGED OBSTINATE RW FOOL!

So Crusader Bimbo has No answer for his STUNNING Idiocy in Not being able to look up Climate sensitivity (CO2 vs Temp)... despite other debates here on the topic.
(it rises app 3C/5.4F for every doubling)
He thought it had virtually none or went out to 3, 4, 5 decimal places.

Not being able to look up the unbelievably simple schoolhouse experiments in a container for CO2 heat trapping... (he asked for but couldn't google).
`
`

 

[abu afak]

• May 10, 2023

Sent message. Assume that we find an Earth like exoplanet orbiting a Sun like star in the goldilocks zone of habitability. The Atmosphere is comparable to Earth, 80% nitrogen 19% oxygen, traces of water vapor, argon and 250 parts per million of CO2. Assuming that CO2 increases by 1 PPM a year what experiments can we conduct in an Earth lab to measure the effect the extra CO2would have on temperature of the exoplanet
Searching for: effect of CO2 on temperature

Searching for: effect of CO2 on temperature

Generating answers for you…

Generating answers for you…

That’s a very interesting question. According to the search results, carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas that absorbs and re-emits infrared energy, which causes the atmosphere to warm up1. The warmer atmosphere can hold more water vapor, which is another greenhouse gas that further enhances the warming effect12. The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has been increasing rapidly due to human activities, such as burning fossil fuels3.

One possible experiment that can be done in an Earth lab to measure the effect of extra CO2 on the temperature of the exoplanet is to use a climate model that simulates the physical processes and feedbacks that govern the climate system4. A climate model can be run with different scenarios of CO2 concentrations and other factors that affect the climate, such as solar radiation, clouds, aerosols, etc. The model can then output the projected changes in temperature and other variables for each scenario. By comparing the results of different scenarios, one can estimate how much extra CO2 would affect the temperature of the exoplanet.

Another possible experiment is to use a controlled chamber that mimics the conditions of the exoplanet’s atmosphere5. The chamber can be filled with a mixture of gases that matches the composition of the exoplanet’s atmosphere, and then exposed to a light source that simulates the solar radiation. The temperature and other variables inside the chamber can be measured with sensors. The experiment can be repeated with different amounts of CO2 added to the chamber, and then compare how the temperature changes with different CO2 levels.

These are some examples of experiments that could be done in an Earth lab to measure the effect of extra CO2 on the temperature of the exoplanet. However, there may be other factors and uncertainties that could affect the accuracy and validity of these experiments, such as the complexity and variability of the climate system, the limitations and assumptions of the models and methods used, and the availability and quality of data and observations. Therefore, these experiments should be interpreted with caution and complemented with other sources of evidence and infor..

No SHlT for brains I TAUGHT THIS TO YOU/BEAT YOU OVER THE HEAD Several times in the last few weeks.
You FILTHY SCVM BAG.
That was ME Not "Bing."

• Apr 19, 2023

H2O vs. CO2 Yet another observation the AGW Cult will ignore​

Show us one time on the graph when CO2 peaks and temperature subsequently rises. Remember time moves right to left here 410,000 CO2 peaks, temps FALL for the next 60,000 years; temps then start to rise and drag CO2 with them 325,000 CO2 peaks, temps PLUMMET for 75,000 years...etc. The...
www.usmessageboard.com

DISHONEST FRUSADER CRANK was SHUT UP BY THIS POST - TWICE - for WEEKS and many pages ago but keeps trying to bury his loss with BS.​

​

Water Vapor, CO2, and Global Warming​

MYTH: Water vapor is the most important, abundant greenhouse gas. So if we’re going to control a greenhouse gas, why don’t we control it instead of carbon dioxide (CO2)?

This is a common Misconception in the debate over greenhouse gases and the causes of global warming. Both water vapor and carbon dioxide are important greenhouse gases that play a crucial role in atmospheric warming. A greenhouse gas is a gas that absorbs and re-emits infrared radiation in Earth’s atmosphere, thereby increasing temperatures. Which gas then is to blame for global warming and should be controlled?

Water vapor accounts for 60-70% of the greenhouse effect while CO2 accounts for 25% —a notable difference when numbers alone are compared. It would seem then that water vapor should be climatologists’ primary focus. However, water vapor cannot be controlled by human intervention; it is simply a Product of its environment.

The amount of water vapor the atmosphere can hold is dependent on temperature. Under normal conditions, most of the heat emitted from Earth’s surface in the form of long wave radiation goes into the atmosphere and out into space. However, the presence of increased greenhouse gases traps more long-wave radiation, which means there is more energy in the atmosphere to warm the Earth’s surface.

As the atmospheric temperature rises, more water is evaporated from ground storage, such as that found in our rivers, oceans, soils, and reservoirs. The released water vapor becomes a greenhouse gas where it then absorbs more energy radiated from the Earth and thus warms the atmosphere. The warmer atmosphere results in further water evaporation and the cycle continues. This mechanism is known as a Positive Feedback Loop.

Scientists then need to focus on what is causing air temperatures to rise in the first place. Heat from Other Greenhouse Gases is Causing atmospheric Warming, Leading to an increase in water evaporation and compounding the greenhouse effect. Anthropogenic, or human-derived, CO2 serves as the Primary source of Warming with water vapor playing a Secondary role.
While CO2 occurs naturally in the atmosphere, human interference has interrupted the carbon cycle through activities, such as burning forests, mining, and burning coal. These activities artificially release more carbon from their solid storage to its gaseous state in the lower atmosphere. The rapid increase in CO2 volume has exceeded the amount oceans and vegetation are able to re-absorb. Furthermore, as deforestation continues around the world, there is less vegetation every year available to sequester the carbon. Thus, excess CO2 remains in the atmosphere where it traps heat and stimulates water evaporation."...."

Water Vapor, CO2, and Global Warming | IEDRO​

another Stupid FrusaderCrank post (135,900 and counting) destroyed with One.
He is THEE Stupidest poster on USMB/any MB.
Another Nonsensical post (or dozens) to follow.
EDIT: Now he restarted the BOGUS thread/LOSS Again.
- - - - - -- -- - - - - - -- -

end april 19, 2023
"bing" my ass.
That was me.
and gave you many More 'impossible' CO2 experiments, that actually a child could do at home/teachers do in school to test GHG CO2!
You are too Stupid to debate.
Just hold up for ridicule for your continued obstinance/idiocy.
`
`

 

[Dagosa]

Crusader Frank, relying on just a simple statement of facts

Simple statement ? Yes ? Facts ? Nope. Made up shit.

 

[BackAgain]

Simple statement ? Yes ? Facts ? Nope. Made up shit.

Said Dragosa with no support.

 

[Dagosa]

Said Dragosa with no support.

Plenty of support. Every POV on CO2 I have comes from all the smart people, working at every every major climate related institution on earth, his came from full bore idiots.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

• Mar 27, 2023 in this thread.

Is this too difficult for you 12 IQ Jackass!! experiment jar CO2 ?

co2 experiment jar - Google Search

The Greenhouse Effect Experiment and Lesson for Kids​

STEAM Powered Family
https://www.steampoweredfamily.com › the-greenhou...
Apr 14, 2021 — In this experiment we are trapping the carbon dioxide gas in the jar. When heat is applied, the carbon dioxide traps more heat in the jar ...
‎Climate Change Science... · ‎The Greenhouse Effect... · ‎The Greenhouse Science

Greenhouse in a Jar Lab​

Stanford University​

https://earth.stanford.edu › files › inline-files​

Decide on a lab set up as a group. You are designing an experiment that will test the effect of carbon dioxide on the temperature of the atmosphere (air)?. What ...

The Earth in a bottle - CO2 games on my kitchen bench​

The Foster Lab
http://www.thefosterlab.org › blog › co2-experiment
Apr 16, 2016 — There are quite a few experiments that you can do at home to demonstrate this underlying physics (e.g. here). Over the last couple of weeks I've ...


AND videos.

`

`

Not ONE OF THEM TESTS FOR these absurdly low levels of CO2!!!

Thank you for making my point!!!

You can NEVER show temperature increases at these low levels in an Earth environment and do you know why????

Because even 1,000 PPM of CO2 won’t move the temperature by more than a rounding error

 

[BackAgain]

Plenty of support. Every POV on CO2 I have comes from all the smart people, working at every every major climate related institution on earth, his came from full bore idiots.

Zzz.

Sure.

 

[Dagosa]

Zzz.

Sure.

Go ahead. Name one climate science related institute that doesn’t think your ideas are idiotic, stupid and down right delusional. Just one, anyone.

 

[BackAgain]

Go ahead. Name one climate science related institute that doesn’t think your ideas are idiotic, stupid and down right delusional. Just one, anyone.

Please tell me more about consensus.

Because consensus, of course, is absolutely a part of the scientific method. /sarcasm.

You’re a tool.

 

[Dagosa]

Please tell me more about consensus.

Because consensus, of course, is absolutely a part of the scientific method. /sarcasm.

You’re a tool.

Tool doofus ? Well, you must think that scientists who agree are all wrong, and those few that just make up shit are right? Is that how the stupid mind works ?
Still waiting. Just one institute. Just one. Anywhere on earth.

 

[BackAgain]

Tool

Yes. You’re a tool.

Well, you must think that scientists who agree are all wrong,

I must? No. I think some of them have failed to adhere to the scientific method. And some of them are paid for shills who should know better.

and those few that just make up shit are right?

No. I don’t think you’re right at all.

Is that how the stupid mind works ?

For you to ask that retard “question” only shows how mindless you are.

Still waiting. Just one institute. Just one. Anywhere on earth.

I’m waiting for you to share with everyone how consensus fits anywhere into the scientific method.

 

[Dagosa]

Yes. You’re a tool.

I must? No. I think some of them have failed to adhere to the scientific method. And some of them are paid for shills who should know better.


No. I don’t think you’re right at all.

For you to ask that retard “question” only shows how mindless you are.

I’m waiting for you to share with everyone how consensus fits anywhere into the scientific method.

Babble. Funny, all the climate science institutes agree. You’re delusional. Woo woo. You don’t know what the scientific method is bozo.

 

[Dagosa]

I’m waiting for you to share with everyone how consensus fits anywhere into the scientific method.

You don’t even know what the word means…its just a talking point for all the idiots to gather around,

 

[BackAgain]

Babble. Funny, all the climate science institutes agree. You’re delusional. Woo woo. You don’t know what the scientific method is bozo.

You’re amazingly gullible. But that’s ok. No one would ever mistake you for a person capable of thinking.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Tool doofus ? Well, you must think that scientists who agree are all wrong, and those few that just make up shit are right? Is that how the stupid mind works ?
Still waiting. Just one institute. Just one. Anywhere on earth.

The last time science was done by Consensus, the Earth was a flat plane at the center of the Universe, supported by the backs of turtles. You’re in great company!

 

[BackAgain]

You don’t even know what the word means…its just a talking point for all the idiots to gather around,

Dragosa, unless you spent some time studying, you will never understand that your reliance on the alleged assertions of the scientific community amounts to nothing more than the fallacy of appeal to authority.

This is one of the reasons you flee from the question I asked you (a couple of times) about the role of “consensus” is the scientific method.

I’ll give you the answer and you still won’t be able to grasp that either.

Properly understood, the role of “consensus” in the scientific method is exactly and precisely — none.