Bill to Improve Education in America: Rand Paul Introduces S.4979

[TNHarley]

Can’t believe what a Douchebag Rand Paul is turning into

That Pesky Constitution | FreedomWorks
"that pesky constitution"

?

You call him a douchebag because he supports the Constitution and you do not.

 

[TNHarley]

You can start with
Wickard v. Filburn :: 317 U.S. 111 (1942)

Thanks for making me read another irrelevant post.

You questioned congresses authority for the Department of Education.

I answered.

You could at least thank me for educating you. (about education) And I don't even have a constitutional mandate to do so.

Commerce has nothing to do with public schools.
Your link is about ACTUAL interstate commerce, not public schools.
Do you understand now?

 

[rightwinger]

Can’t believe what a Douchebag Rand Paul is turning into

That Pesky Constitution | FreedomWorks
"that pesky constitution"

?

You call him a douchebag because he supports the Constitution and you do not.

I have sworn to defend the Constitution

Nothing prevents a Dept of Education

 

[TNHarley]

Nothing prevents a Dept of Education

Thats the whole point. It isnt even mentioned.
Thats what makes it unconstitutional.
You swore to defend a a document you dont even understand?

 

[rightwinger]

Nothing prevents a Dept of Education

Thats the whole point. It isnt even mentioned.
Thats what makes it unconstitutional.
You swore to defend a a document you dont even understand?

You really don’t understand the Constitution do you?
It is only four pages long and does not provide point by point This is allowed, This isn’t

 

[TNHarley]

Nothing prevents a Dept of Education

Thats the whole point. It isnt even mentioned.
Thats what makes it unconstitutional.
You swore to defend a a document you dont even understand?

You really don’t understand the Constitution do you?
It is only four pages long and does not provide point by point This is allowed, This isn’t

It gives the federal govt a specific list of powers. It even specifically states that anything else is left to the states.
Its called 3rd grade civics

 

[meaner gene]

Commerce has nothing to do with public schools.
Your link is about ACTUAL interstate commerce, not public schools.
Do you understand now?

Wickard, followed by Miller, followed by dozens of more cases.

United States v. Lopez :: 514 U.S. 549 (1995)

Which restricted the powers of congress under the commerce clause, upheld their authority over public schools.

 

[rightwinger]

Nothing prevents a Dept of Education

Thats the whole point. It isnt even mentioned.
Thats what makes it unconstitutional.
You swore to defend a a document you dont even understand?

You really don’t understand the Constitution do you?
It is only four pages long and does not provide point by point This is allowed, This isn’t

It gives the federal govt a specific list of powers. It even specifically states that anything else is left to the states.
Its called 3rd grade civics

Federal Government has broad powers.
Your limited interpretation is not supported by the courts. Never has

 

[meaner gene]

Federal Government has broad powers.
Your limited interpretation is not supported by the courts. Never has

Probably 90% of the powers of congress are derived from the explicit and implicit powers. The founding fathers didn't spell out in details which would have consumed hundreds of pages. They thought future generations could figure out what they meant in their limited verbiage.

 

[Natural Citizen]

Wickard, followed by Miller, followed by dozens of more cases.

United States v. Lopez :: 514 U.S. 549 (1995)

Which restricted the powers of congress under the commerce clause, upheld their authority over public schools.

You have no idea what you're talking about. lol.

 

[Natural Citizen]

Federal Government has broad powers.
Your limited interpretation is not supported by the courts. Never has

Yeah, you're gonna have to help us out and find judicial review in Article III.

The constitution was designed to "strictly limit" government.

Not the electorate.

 

[Natural Citizen]

Probably 90% of the powers of congress are derived from the explicit and implicit powers. The founding fathers didn't spell out in details which would have consumed hundreds of pages. They thought future generations could figure out what they meant in their limited verbiage.

This pablum is especially laughable.

Again, you have no idea what you're talking about. lol.

But you can dream...

 

[rightwinger]

Federal Government has broad powers.
Your limited interpretation is not supported by the courts. Never has

Probably 90% of the powers of congress are derived from the explicit and implicit powers. The founding fathers didn't spell out in details which would have consumed hundreds of pages. They thought future generations could figure out what they meant in their limited verbiage.

It has worked well so far. We do not want 18th century minds telling the 21 st century what to do

 

[Natural Citizen]

The founding fathers didn't spell out in details which would have consumed hundreds of pages.

See The Federalist, dummy.

 

[rightwinger]

Federal Government has broad powers.
Your limited interpretation is not supported by the courts. Never has

Yeah, you're gonna have to help us out and find judicial review in Article III.

The constitution was designed to "strictly limit" government.

Not the electorate.

Show where the constitution says anything about strictly limiting Government

We the People limit Government

 

[TNHarley]

Commerce has nothing to do with public schools.
Your link is about ACTUAL interstate commerce, not public schools.
Do you understand now?

Wickard, followed by Miller, followed by dozens of more cases.

United States v. Lopez :: 514 U.S. 549 (1995)

Which restricted the powers of congress under the commerce clause, upheld their authority over public schools.

Another irrelevant link.
3 strikes and youre OUT!

 

[meaner gene]

United States v. Lopez :: 514 U.S. 549 (1995)

Which restricted the powers of congress under the commerce clause, upheld their authority over public schools.

You have no idea what you're talking about. lol.

Read the cliff notes of the case.

This is like Heller V DC. The majority opinion made a law unconstitutional, but at the same time confirmed previous powers of congress.

 

[TNHarley]

Federal Government has broad powers.
Your limited interpretation is not supported by the courts. Never has

Probably 90% of the powers of congress are derived from the explicit and implicit powers. The founding fathers didn't spell out in details which would have consumed hundreds of pages. They thought future generations could figure out what they meant in their limited verbiage.

It has worked well so far. We do not want 18th century minds telling the 21 st century what to do

Says the guy that believes in a type of totalitarian govt based off 12th century England.

 

[rightwinger]

The scope of the Department ofEducation needs to be expanded to control those States that do a shit job

 

[rightwinger]

Federal Government has broad powers.
Your limited interpretation is not supported by the courts. Never has

Probably 90% of the powers of congress are derived from the explicit and implicit powers. The founding fathers didn't spell out in details which would have consumed hundreds of pages. They thought future generations could figure out what they meant in their limited verbiage.

It has worked well so far. We do not want 18th century minds telling the 21 st century what to do

Says the guy that believes in a type of totalitarian govt based off 12th century England.

Actually it is you trapped in the 18th century

Th