If everyone gets more cash, where is the problem? High wages are what made your economy strong.
That's so far divorced from reality it's silly...
Go work for 7.25, then.
You know, you're not even making an argument. You're just belching up nonsensical bullshit.
You tell me to go to work for $7.25 an hour. Why would I do that? I'm an adult, with a lifetime of experience and training, and a skill set which people value. I don't have to work for $7.25 an hour. It'll probably make you apoplectic to learn, but my hourly rate is $235 an hour, and I'm probably on the lower end of the price spectrum in my area for what I do.
But, like I said, I used to work for minimum wage when it was $2.65 an hour. At 40 hours a week, that wasn't even $425 a month
gross.
Minimum wage jobs are not the jobs that 58 year old people, with a lifetime of experience and training, and a skill set which people value, have. Minimum wage jobs are for kids who still live with Mom and Dad; I was 16 when I had mine. If you think you should be able to support a family of four on minimum wage, you're ignorant. If you think you'll be able to support a family of four on $15 an hour, you are profoundly naive.
I have a friend with a landscaping business here in northeastern Florida. He starts his people (everyone of which is in the country legally, by the way) at $18 an hour. After the first 90 days, they get bumped to $19 an hour. After the first year, if they've proven to be a good employee, they go to $21 an hour. Some people have been with him, raking leaves and mowing lawns, for over a decade. Why? Because they're all too aware that he could be paying someone $8 an hour to do that work, so they bust their asses to make sure he never has a reason to question whether or not he should keep them employed. But, because he pays them well, they would follow hm to the gates of Hell and back if they had to. They do it because they know that, as employees, they carry a high value to the owner.
If I have two employees to whom I pay $10 an hour, and I let them know that in a month I'm going to pick one of them to pay $15 a month, the productivity of each will improve. After all, who doesn't want to get paid 50% more?
But if the government says that, in 30 days I'm going to have to pay
both of them 50% more, neither has any reason to improve his productivity. Additionally, the odds of both of them remaining employed decreases, because in a month those two employees are going to cost me what
three employees would've cost me before the mandated minimum wage increase, and I, as the business owner, would realize absolutely zero benefit.
It's ignorant and naive to believe that doubling the minimum wage is going to solve the economic ills of minimum wage employees.
It will do nothing of the sort...