Best response ever to the stupidest question ever: Does Israel have the right to exist?

They can exist but they can never live in peace, due to their cruel genocide against Palestinians. They know they've lost their chance.

It could have worked for them but they lost the ability to dictate to ME countries when Brics nations empowered Iran with the ability to scoff at their Iron Dome.

Suddenly Trump compromising with Russia seems like the only way forward for America now!
 
They can exist but they can never live in peace,
I agree, though I would say the reason they can never live in peace is because their psychopathic "religion" forbids it. And I'm not kidding. That's why I say Judaism is a disease. It is a psychopathy. It literally commands the enslavement or extermination of all humanity.

 
The Muslims are the ones who can never live in peace.

Stop the gaslighting.

And return the hostages and their remains.
 
You mean the thousands of hostages that the Israelis have been holding, torturing, and murdering in the dungeons of Israel for decades? Those hostages?

You launched the war. You should all be dead for the mass murder raid.
 
They can exist but they can never live in peace, due to their cruel genocide against Palestinians. They know they've lost their chance.

It could have worked for them but they lost the ability to dictate to ME countries when Brics nations empowered Iran with the ability to scoff at their Iron Dome.

Suddenly Trump compromising with Russia seems like the only way forward for America now!
I don't think any of that is true. I do think the Israelis are less interested in living in peace than they are with displacement of the Palestinians.
 
Francesca Albanese schools ignorant reporter.


We agree that "Does Israel have a right to exist" is the stupidest question. The best response, though, was from Natasha Hausdorff, who said (paraphrased because I can't find a short clip), "Israel exists. Demanding it be dismantled isn't akin to preventing a pregnancy, it is akin to murdering a man in his 70s". Natasha is a brilliant international legal expert and recently offered to debate international law with Francesca. Francesca declined. Shame, that. It would have been epic.

The framing Francesca gives, does leave her position on slippery ground, though. Because Palestine is NOT a State. And can't yet be a State because it does not fulfill the requirements of a State.

The term "occupation" refers to territory, not to a people. A "people" are not occupied, territory is occupied. Since there is no territory belonging to a State of Palestine, there can be no occupation.

There are only two legal ways forward: 1. Arabs negotiate a border agreement with Israel and secede. 2. Arabs accept Israeli sovereignty over the whole of the territory.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom