Benghazi - There is nothing there

[WillowTree]

We know exactly what did not happen. What did not happen is an attempt to rescue those guys. They were left high and dry. And dead.

What part of "there was not enough time" do you not understand? Are your Republicans in Congress that stupid that they couldn't find the fault you so desperately seek? Give it up.....more people died on 9/11 and none of you are holding doofus Bush responsible. Hypocrites.

You need to get up to speed your history sucks.

You need to quit posting lies. Boy you conservatives are really dense.

It really gets tiring having to deal with your conservative thick skulls that can't seem to accept facts.


House Speaker John Boehner says there are “unanswered questions” about the 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi. He specifically asks “why didn’t we attempt to rescue” Americans under siege and why were some U.S. personnel “told not to get involved” in rescue attempts?

But those questions have been answered at length in several investigative reports, including two by Republican-controlled House committees. Congressional committees and an independent board detail the rescue attempts that night, carried out despite U.S. military assets not being in position to defend the Benghazi facility. Those reports say there were no undue delays in responding to the attacks, and they pointedly rejected unfounded allegations that the U.S. response was deliberately thwarted by a “stand down” order.
Boehner and Benghazi

Tell us what happened then retard. Go.

 

[WillowTree]

It takes one hour and 19 minutes to fly from Tripoli to Benghazi.

 

[WillowTree]

Conclusion. Mertex is a moron.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

We know exactly what did not happen. What did not happen is an attempt to rescue those guys. They were left high and dry. And dead.

No different than the many embassy attacks under Bush

What ******* nonsense, and totally irrelevant were it even true.

 

[playtime]

Libtards claim they know everything and are smarter than the average , they don't believe the truth, the survivor or anybody else, yet they **** up everything they touch and have to lie to the American people to cover up their cluster *****. I wouldn't trust you fucktards with my safety under any circumstances.

And yet, nothing was found to be what is falsely claimed.

not after 1
not after 2
not after 3
not after 4
not after 5
not after 6
not after 7
not after 8 investigations.

what is that Einstein said again?
oh ya....

Why don't you tell us exactly what happened in Benghazi. I would love to hear it.

Better yet, after 8 investigations, & nothing was EVER found to be of credible evidence that affirms any nefarious activity took place... you come up with something new to refute the actual findings 'k?

Go ahead, tell us exactly what happened in Benghazi. And why it happened. I am willing to be set straight on the matter.

LOL. You see, here in American- one is innocent until proven guilty. So far, based on all the evidence, after 8 investigations, & $7,000,000,000.00 later, that guilty charge hasn't happened.

SO, in order for that to EVER happen, NEW undiscovered "proof" must be introduced. SO, sweety, that burden lies on the shoulders of the accuser. That would be *you*. Have fun finding it & get back to me when you do.

 

[WillowTree]

Libtards claim they know everything and are smarter than the average , they don't believe the truth, the survivor or anybody else, yet they **** up everything they touch and have to lie to the American people to cover up their cluster *****. I wouldn't trust you fucktards with my safety under any circumstances.

And yet, nothing was found to be what is falsely claimed.

not after 1
not after 2
not after 3
not after 4
not after 5
not after 6
not after 7
not after 8 investigations.

what is that Einstein said again?
oh ya....

Why don't you tell us exactly what happened in Benghazi. I would love to hear it.

Better yet, after 8 investigations, & nothing was EVER found to be of credible evidence that affirms any nefarious activity took place... you come up with something new to refute the actual findings 'k?

Go ahead, tell us exactly what happened in Benghazi. And why it happened. I am willing to be set straight on the matter.

LOL. You see, here in American- one is innocent until proven guilty. So far, based on all the evidence, after 8 investigations, & $7,000,000,000.00 later, that guilty charge hasn't happened.

SO, in order for that to EVER happen, NEW undiscovered "proof" must be introduced. SO, sweety, that burden lies on the shoulders of the accuser. That would be *you*. Have fun finding it & get back to me when you do.

Which part of the survivors story is wrong? Where do they lie?

 

[playtime]

yeah....nothing there.....nothing at all

So, you admit that the GOP lied? Thank you. Maybe we should now investigate the GOP for lying?

Fox News Finally Concedes Benghazi Committee Is Political After Republicans Admit To Partisan Nature Of Investigation

Benghazi panel caps 2-year probe: No bombshell, faults administration - CNNPolitics.com

Of course it's political you , the Republicans run Congress, just like OBAMACARE was jammed down our throats by a DemoRAT Congress....Biased...

the same "Obamacare" that chief justice Roberts, appointed by a republican, broke the tie & decided that the ACA become a mandate & the "law of the land"?

 

[WillowTree]

We know exactly what did not happen. What did not happen is an attempt to rescue those guys. They were left high and dry. And dead.

No different than the many embassy attacks under Bush

What ******* nonsense, and totally irrelevant were it even true.

We are talking to a whole roomful of retards armed with a political agenda. They know Hillary ain't guilty but they won't tell you what happened in Benghazi.

 

[WillowTree]

 

[rightwinger]

Hired gun, famous prosecutor Trey Gowdy was brought in to get all the dirt on Benghazi

We got Hillary now

Hillary showed him to be the fool he is

 

[playtime]

And yet, nothing was found to be what is falsely claimed.

not after 1
not after 2
not after 3
not after 4
not after 5
not after 6
not after 7
not after 8 investigations.

what is that Einstein said again?
oh ya....

Why don't you tell us exactly what happened in Benghazi. I would love to hear it.

Better yet, after 8 investigations, & nothing was EVER found to be of credible evidence that affirms any nefarious activity took place... you come up with something new to refute the actual findings 'k?

Go ahead, tell us exactly what happened in Benghazi. And why it happened. I am willing to be set straight on the matter.

LOL. You see, here in American- one is innocent until proven guilty. So far, based on all the evidence, after 8 investigations, & $7,000,000,000.00 later, that guilty charge hasn't happened.

SO, in order for that to EVER happen, NEW undiscovered "proof" must be introduced. SO, sweety, that burden lies on the shoulders of the accuser. That would be *you*. Have fun finding it & get back to me when you do.

Which part of the survivors story is wrong? Where do they lie?

Did Panetta, Petreus, & Dempsey lie? How about Chipman, the GOP's chief investigator? Did he lie? How about Ambassador Steven's own family?

They implored the powers that be not to make his death political & use "Benghazi" as political fodder to further their agenda. & touted the way he conducted himself in Libya, dating back to 2013.
[...]
Chris was not willing to be the kind of diplomat who would strut around in fortified compounds. He amazed and impressed the Libyans by walking the streets with the lightest of escorts, sitting in sidewalk cafes, chatting with passers-by. There was a risk to being accessible. He knew it, and he accepted it.
What Chris never would have accepted was the idea that his death would be used for political purposes. There were security shortcomings, no doubt. Both internal and outside investigations have identified and publicly disclosed them. Steps are being taken to prevent their reoccurrence.
Chris would not have wanted to be remembered as a victim. Chris knew, and accepted, that he was working under dangerous circumstances. He did so -- just as so many of our diplomatic and development professionals do every day -- because he believed the work was vitally important. He would have wanted the critical work he was doing to build bridges of mutual understanding and respect -- the kind of work that made him literally thousands of friends and admirers across the broader Middle East -- to continue.
So rather than engage in endless recriminations, his family is working to continue building the bridges he so successfully began.
[...]

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/JCS-Family-Contribution.pdf

And that is STILL the sentiment 3 years later:

Amb. Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi
By David Wright, CNN
Updated 7:44 AM ET, Thu June 30, 2016

(CNN)The sister of the U.S. ambassador to Libya killed in Benghazi said she doesn't blame Hillary Clinton for Chris Stevens' death, instead pointing to Congress for under-budgeting the State Department.

"I do not blame Hillary Clinton or Leon Panetta (for Stevens' death). They were balancing security efforts at embassies and missions around the world," Dr. Anne Stevens, who has acted as a spokesperson for the family, said in an interview with the New Yorker published Tuesday.

"But what was the underlying cause? Perhaps if Congress had provided a budget to increase security for all missions around the world, then some of the requests for more security in Libya would have been granted. Certainly the State Department is underbudgeted," she added. "I would love to hear they are drastically increasing the budget."

Stevens also said that "it doesn't look like there's anything new" in the Benghazi reports released by House Republicans and Democrats earlier this week after two years spent investigating the 2012 attacks, and she expressed frustration with the politicization of the tragedy that killed her brother.

"Yes! Definitely politicized," Stevens said. "Every report I read that mentions him specifically has a political bent, and accusatory bent..."

Amb. Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi - CNNPolitics.com

 

[playtime]

We know exactly what did not happen. What did not happen is an attempt to rescue those guys. They were left high and dry. And dead.

No different than the many embassy attacks under Bush....why didn't Bush's administration not make an attempt to rescue them? Why did Bush leave them high and dry, and dead? Because you are a hypocrite.

http://thedailybanter.com/2013/05/1...-on-bushs-watch-without-a-peep-from-fox-news/

Big difference! I don't recall President Bush covering anything up, stonewalling congress and destroying servers. Do you?

W. & Dick had their own problems with 9/11. W. wouldn't answer any questions unless it was behind closed doors & he demanded that Dick be by his side when he did.

And did you forget that little incident about the millions of emails from the White House that went missing in regards to the mass firings of US attorneys because it might show political motives?

 

[WillowTree]

Why don't you tell us exactly what happened in Benghazi. I would love to hear it.

Better yet, after 8 investigations, & nothing was EVER found to be of credible evidence that affirms any nefarious activity took place... you come up with something new to refute the actual findings 'k?

Go ahead, tell us exactly what happened in Benghazi. And why it happened. I am willing to be set straight on the matter.

LOL. You see, here in American- one is innocent until proven guilty. So far, based on all the evidence, after 8 investigations, & $7,000,000,000.00 later, that guilty charge hasn't happened.

SO, in order for that to EVER happen, NEW undiscovered "proof" must be introduced. SO, sweety, that burden lies on the shoulders of the accuser. That would be *you*. Have fun finding it & get back to me when you do.

Which part of the survivors story is wrong? Where do they lie?

Did Panetta, Petreus, & Dempsey lie? How about Chipman, the GOP's chief investigator? Did he lie? How about Ambassador Steven's own family?

They implored the powers that be not to make his death political & use "Benghazi" as political fodder to further their agenda. & touted the way he conducted himself in Libya, dating back to 2013.
[...]
Chris was not willing to be the kind of diplomat who would strut around in fortified compounds. He amazed and impressed the Libyans by walking the streets with the lightest of escorts, sitting in sidewalk cafes, chatting with passers-by. There was a risk to being accessible. He knew it, and he accepted it.
What Chris never would have accepted was the idea that his death would be used for political purposes. There were security shortcomings, no doubt. Both internal and outside investigations have identified and publicly disclosed them. Steps are being taken to prevent their reoccurrence.
Chris would not have wanted to be remembered as a victim. Chris knew, and accepted, that he was working under dangerous circumstances. He did so -- just as so many of our diplomatic and development professionals do every day -- because he believed the work was vitally important. He would have wanted the critical work he was doing to build bridges of mutual understanding and respect -- the kind of work that made him literally thousands of friends and admirers across the broader Middle East -- to continue.
So rather than engage in endless recriminations, his family is working to continue building the bridges he so successfully began.
[...]

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/JCS-Family-Contribution.pdf

And that is STILL the sentiment 3 years later:

Amb. Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi
By David Wright, CNN
Updated 7:44 AM ET, Thu June 30, 2016

(CNN)The sister of the U.S. ambassador to Libya killed in Benghazi said she doesn't blame Hillary Clinton for Chris Stevens' death, instead pointing to Congress for under-budgeting the State Department.

"I do not blame Hillary Clinton or Leon Panetta (for Stevens' death). They were balancing security efforts at embassies and missions around the world," Dr. Anne Stevens, who has acted as a spokesperson for the family, said in an interview with the New Yorker published Tuesday.

"But what was the underlying cause? Perhaps if Congress had provided a budget to increase security for all missions around the world, then some of the requests for more security in Libya would have been granted. Certainly the State Department is underbudgeted," she added. "I would love to hear they are drastically increasing the budget."

Stevens also said that "it doesn't look like there's anything new" in the Benghazi reports released by House Republicans and Democrats earlier this week after two years spent investigating the 2012 attacks, and she expressed frustration with the politicization of the tragedy that killed her brother.

"Yes! Definitely politicized," Stevens said. "Every report I read that mentions him specifically has a political bent, and accusatory bent..."

Amb. Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi - CNNPolitics.com

Get back to me retard when you are willing to tell me what happened in Benghazi and why, until then? I am done arguing with a retard with an agenda.

 

[Iceweasel]

LOL. You see, here in American- one is innocent until proven guilty. So far, based on all the evidence, after 8 investigations, & $7,000,000,000.00 later, that guilty charge hasn't happened.

SO, in order for that to EVER happen, NEW undiscovered "proof" must be introduced. SO, sweety, that burden lies on the shoulders of the accuser. That would be *you*. Have fun finding it & get back to me when you do.

Nixon was never charged either. Bush is still called a lying war criminal by the leftists. But when it comes to their own it's a different matter entirely. We do have the facts and most people can add 2 plus 2. We don't need liberals to tell us it can't add up to 4 because 4 doesn't exist.

 

[playtime]

Better yet, after 8 investigations, & nothing was EVER found to be of credible evidence that affirms any nefarious activity took place... you come up with something new to refute the actual findings 'k?

Go ahead, tell us exactly what happened in Benghazi. And why it happened. I am willing to be set straight on the matter.

LOL. You see, here in American- one is innocent until proven guilty. So far, based on all the evidence, after 8 investigations, & $7,000,000,000.00 later, that guilty charge hasn't happened.

SO, in order for that to EVER happen, NEW undiscovered "proof" must be introduced. SO, sweety, that burden lies on the shoulders of the accuser. That would be *you*. Have fun finding it & get back to me when you do.

Which part of the survivors story is wrong? Where do they lie?

Did Panetta, Petreus, & Dempsey lie? How about Chipman, the GOP's chief investigator? Did he lie? How about Ambassador Steven's own family?

They implored the powers that be not to make his death political & use "Benghazi" as political fodder to further their agenda. & touted the way he conducted himself in Libya, dating back to 2013.
[...]
Chris was not willing to be the kind of diplomat who would strut around in fortified compounds. He amazed and impressed the Libyans by walking the streets with the lightest of escorts, sitting in sidewalk cafes, chatting with passers-by. There was a risk to being accessible. He knew it, and he accepted it.
What Chris never would have accepted was the idea that his death would be used for political purposes. There were security shortcomings, no doubt. Both internal and outside investigations have identified and publicly disclosed them. Steps are being taken to prevent their reoccurrence.
Chris would not have wanted to be remembered as a victim. Chris knew, and accepted, that he was working under dangerous circumstances. He did so -- just as so many of our diplomatic and development professionals do every day -- because he believed the work was vitally important. He would have wanted the critical work he was doing to build bridges of mutual understanding and respect -- the kind of work that made him literally thousands of friends and admirers across the broader Middle East -- to continue.
So rather than engage in endless recriminations, his family is working to continue building the bridges he so successfully began.
[...]

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/JCS-Family-Contribution.pdf

And that is STILL the sentiment 3 years later:

Amb. Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi
By David Wright, CNN
Updated 7:44 AM ET, Thu June 30, 2016

(CNN)The sister of the U.S. ambassador to Libya killed in Benghazi said she doesn't blame Hillary Clinton for Chris Stevens' death, instead pointing to Congress for under-budgeting the State Department.

"I do not blame Hillary Clinton or Leon Panetta (for Stevens' death). They were balancing security efforts at embassies and missions around the world," Dr. Anne Stevens, who has acted as a spokesperson for the family, said in an interview with the New Yorker published Tuesday.

"But what was the underlying cause? Perhaps if Congress had provided a budget to increase security for all missions around the world, then some of the requests for more security in Libya would have been granted. Certainly the State Department is underbudgeted," she added. "I would love to hear they are drastically increasing the budget."

Stevens also said that "it doesn't look like there's anything new" in the Benghazi reports released by House Republicans and Democrats earlier this week after two years spent investigating the 2012 attacks, and she expressed frustration with the politicization of the tragedy that killed her brother.

"Yes! Definitely politicized," Stevens said. "Every report I read that mentions him specifically has a political bent, and accusatory bent..."

Amb. Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi - CNNPolitics.com

Get back to me retard when you are willing to tell me what happened in Benghazi and why, until then? I am done arguing with a retard with an agenda.

LOL. So you still have nothing new. Got it. Ba-bye & don't let the Benghazi conspiracy theories hit you in the ass on the way out.

 

[rightwinger]

We know exactly what did not happen. What did not happen is an attempt to rescue those guys. They were left high and dry. And dead.

No different than the many embassy attacks under Bush....why didn't Bush's administration not make an attempt to rescue them? Why did Bush leave them high and dry, and dead? Because you are a hypocrite.

http://thedailybanter.com/2013/05/1...-on-bushs-watch-without-a-peep-from-fox-news/

Big difference! I don't recall President Bush covering anything up, stonewalling congress and destroying servers. Do you?

W. & Dick had their own problems with 9/11. W. wouldn't answer any questions unless it was behind closed doors & he demanded that Dick be by his side when he did.

And did you forget that little incident about the millions of emails from the White House that went missing in regards to the mass firings of US attorneys because it might show political motives?

Don't forget the security breach of outing CIA agent Valerie Plame

 

[playtime]

LOL. You see, here in American- one is innocent until proven guilty. So far, based on all the evidence, after 8 investigations, & $7,000,000,000.00 later, that guilty charge hasn't happened.

SO, in order for that to EVER happen, NEW undiscovered "proof" must be introduced. SO, sweety, that burden lies on the shoulders of the accuser. That would be *you*. Have fun finding it & get back to me when you do.

Nixon was never charged either. Bush is still called a lying war criminal by the leftists. But when it comes to their own it's a different matter entirely. We do have the facts and most people can add 2 plus 2. We don't need liberals to tell us it can't add up to 4 because 4 doesn't exist.

I don't think Bush was "in on 9/11" I do, however still believe that warnings were ignored. Nixon, btw, resigned. Why?

 

[playtime]

We know exactly what did not happen. What did not happen is an attempt to rescue those guys. They were left high and dry. And dead.

No different than the many embassy attacks under Bush....why didn't Bush's administration not make an attempt to rescue them? Why did Bush leave them high and dry, and dead? Because you are a hypocrite.

http://thedailybanter.com/2013/05/1...-on-bushs-watch-without-a-peep-from-fox-news/

Big difference! I don't recall President Bush covering anything up, stonewalling congress and destroying servers. Do you?

W. & Dick had their own problems with 9/11. W. wouldn't answer any questions unless it was behind closed doors & he demanded that Dick be by his side when he did.

And did you forget that little incident about the millions of emails from the White House that went missing in regards to the mass firings of US attorneys because it might show political motives?

Don't forget the security breach of outing CIA agent Valerie Plame

& Bush made sure that Scooter Libby was out of prison before that soap hit the floor.

 

[rightwinger]

Better yet, after 8 investigations, & nothing was EVER found to be of credible evidence that affirms any nefarious activity took place... you come up with something new to refute the actual findings 'k?

Go ahead, tell us exactly what happened in Benghazi. And why it happened. I am willing to be set straight on the matter.

LOL. You see, here in American- one is innocent until proven guilty. So far, based on all the evidence, after 8 investigations, & $7,000,000,000.00 later, that guilty charge hasn't happened.

SO, in order for that to EVER happen, NEW undiscovered "proof" must be introduced. SO, sweety, that burden lies on the shoulders of the accuser. That would be *you*. Have fun finding it & get back to me when you do.

Which part of the survivors story is wrong? Where do they lie?

Did Panetta, Petreus, & Dempsey lie? How about Chipman, the GOP's chief investigator? Did he lie? How about Ambassador Steven's own family?

They implored the powers that be not to make his death political & use "Benghazi" as political fodder to further their agenda. & touted the way he conducted himself in Libya, dating back to 2013.
[...]
Chris was not willing to be the kind of diplomat who would strut around in fortified compounds. He amazed and impressed the Libyans by walking the streets with the lightest of escorts, sitting in sidewalk cafes, chatting with passers-by. There was a risk to being accessible. He knew it, and he accepted it.
What Chris never would have accepted was the idea that his death would be used for political purposes. There were security shortcomings, no doubt. Both internal and outside investigations have identified and publicly disclosed them. Steps are being taken to prevent their reoccurrence.
Chris would not have wanted to be remembered as a victim. Chris knew, and accepted, that he was working under dangerous circumstances. He did so -- just as so many of our diplomatic and development professionals do every day -- because he believed the work was vitally important. He would have wanted the critical work he was doing to build bridges of mutual understanding and respect -- the kind of work that made him literally thousands of friends and admirers across the broader Middle East -- to continue.
So rather than engage in endless recriminations, his family is working to continue building the bridges he so successfully began.
[...]

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/JCS-Family-Contribution.pdf

And that is STILL the sentiment 3 years later:

Amb. Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi
By David Wright, CNN
Updated 7:44 AM ET, Thu June 30, 2016

(CNN)The sister of the U.S. ambassador to Libya killed in Benghazi said she doesn't blame Hillary Clinton for Chris Stevens' death, instead pointing to Congress for under-budgeting the State Department.

"I do not blame Hillary Clinton or Leon Panetta (for Stevens' death). They were balancing security efforts at embassies and missions around the world," Dr. Anne Stevens, who has acted as a spokesperson for the family, said in an interview with the New Yorker published Tuesday.

"But what was the underlying cause? Perhaps if Congress had provided a budget to increase security for all missions around the world, then some of the requests for more security in Libya would have been granted. Certainly the State Department is underbudgeted," she added. "I would love to hear they are drastically increasing the budget."

Stevens also said that "it doesn't look like there's anything new" in the Benghazi reports released by House Republicans and Democrats earlier this week after two years spent investigating the 2012 attacks, and she expressed frustration with the politicization of the tragedy that killed her brother.

"Yes! Definitely politicized," Stevens said. "Every report I read that mentions him specifically has a political bent, and accusatory bent..."

Amb. Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi - CNNPolitics.com

Get back to me retard when you are willing to tell me what happened in Benghazi and why, until then? I am done arguing with a retard with an agenda.

There have already been eight congressional investigations to tell you what and why

 

[WillowTree]

Go ahead, tell us exactly what happened in Benghazi. And why it happened. I am willing to be set straight on the matter.

LOL. You see, here in American- one is innocent until proven guilty. So far, based on all the evidence, after 8 investigations, & $7,000,000,000.00 later, that guilty charge hasn't happened.

SO, in order for that to EVER happen, NEW undiscovered "proof" must be introduced. SO, sweety, that burden lies on the shoulders of the accuser. That would be *you*. Have fun finding it & get back to me when you do.

Which part of the survivors story is wrong? Where do they lie?

Did Panetta, Petreus, & Dempsey lie? How about Chipman, the GOP's chief investigator? Did he lie? How about Ambassador Steven's own family?

They implored the powers that be not to make his death political & use "Benghazi" as political fodder to further their agenda. & touted the way he conducted himself in Libya, dating back to 2013.
[...]
Chris was not willing to be the kind of diplomat who would strut around in fortified compounds. He amazed and impressed the Libyans by walking the streets with the lightest of escorts, sitting in sidewalk cafes, chatting with passers-by. There was a risk to being accessible. He knew it, and he accepted it.
What Chris never would have accepted was the idea that his death would be used for political purposes. There were security shortcomings, no doubt. Both internal and outside investigations have identified and publicly disclosed them. Steps are being taken to prevent their reoccurrence.
Chris would not have wanted to be remembered as a victim. Chris knew, and accepted, that he was working under dangerous circumstances. He did so -- just as so many of our diplomatic and development professionals do every day -- because he believed the work was vitally important. He would have wanted the critical work he was doing to build bridges of mutual understanding and respect -- the kind of work that made him literally thousands of friends and admirers across the broader Middle East -- to continue.
So rather than engage in endless recriminations, his family is working to continue building the bridges he so successfully began.
[...]

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/JCS-Family-Contribution.pdf

And that is STILL the sentiment 3 years later:

Amb. Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi
By David Wright, CNN
Updated 7:44 AM ET, Thu June 30, 2016

(CNN)The sister of the U.S. ambassador to Libya killed in Benghazi said she doesn't blame Hillary Clinton for Chris Stevens' death, instead pointing to Congress for under-budgeting the State Department.

"I do not blame Hillary Clinton or Leon Panetta (for Stevens' death). They were balancing security efforts at embassies and missions around the world," Dr. Anne Stevens, who has acted as a spokesperson for the family, said in an interview with the New Yorker published Tuesday.

"But what was the underlying cause? Perhaps if Congress had provided a budget to increase security for all missions around the world, then some of the requests for more security in Libya would have been granted. Certainly the State Department is underbudgeted," she added. "I would love to hear they are drastically increasing the budget."

Stevens also said that "it doesn't look like there's anything new" in the Benghazi reports released by House Republicans and Democrats earlier this week after two years spent investigating the 2012 attacks, and she expressed frustration with the politicization of the tragedy that killed her brother.

"Yes! Definitely politicized," Stevens said. "Every report I read that mentions him specifically has a political bent, and accusatory bent..."

Amb. Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi - CNNPolitics.com

Get back to me retard when you are willing to tell me what happened in Benghazi and why, until then? I am done arguing with a retard with an agenda.

There have already been eight congressional investigations to tell you what and why

Correct. Nothing happened in Benghazi. No security was provided, no help was sent. Four died while Hillary lied. If you expect a democrat to have your back kiss your ass goodbye.