Barack Obama Says Boys Need Gay Friends and Mentors

[Hollie]

Obama was literally screaming out his gayness on his wife’s podcast. Must have been just a bit awkward for her.

Not clear why Barack felt that conversation was needed.

Barack Obama Says Boys Need Gay Friends and Mentors (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

Barack Obama appeared on his wife Michelle’s failing podcast this week to give some advice to young men.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

And that’s one of the things that I think a lot of times boys need, is, not just exposure to one guy, one dad, no matter how good the dad. He can’t be everything. And that boy may need somebody to give the boy some perspective on the dad right?” Obama said on the “IMO” podcast this week.


“You need that, to show empathy and kindness. And by the way, you need that person in your friend group, so that if you then have a boy who is gay or non-binary or whatever, they have somebody that they can go, ‘Okay, I’m not alone in this,’ right? So that, I think, is creating that community. I know it’s corny, but that’s what they need,” Obama said.

 

[EMH]

Must have been just a bit awkward for her.

Big Mike is a man. Never call him "her."

• 
  
• 
  

 

[Lisa558]

He should have emphasized that what boys (and girls, too) need more than anything is living in a home with married parents.

But that would imply that the cause of the problems in the black ghettos is that 75% of kids are born out-of-wedlock, and mostly to women who can’t afford to support them.

So he reverts to the gay stuff.

 

[mudwhistle]

Obama was literally screaming out his gayness on his wife’s podcast. Must have been just a bit awkward for her.

Not clear why Barack felt that conversation was needed.

Barack Obama Says Boys Need Gay Friends and Mentors (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

Barack Obama appeared on his wife Michelle’s failing podcast this week to give some advice to young men.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

And that’s one of the things that I think a lot of times boys need, is, not just exposure to one guy, one dad, no matter how good the dad. He can’t be everything. And that boy may need somebody to give the boy some perspective on the dad right?” Obama said on the “IMO” podcast this week.


“You need that, to show empathy and kindness. And by the way, you need that person in your friend group, so that if you then have a boy who is gay or non-binary or whatever, they have somebody that they can go, ‘Okay, I’m not alone in this,’ right? So that, I think, is creating that community. I know it’s corny, but that’s what they need,” Obama said.

Obama is the reason you don't want some commie *** ass-raping your son.

They tend to go off the deep end and don't give a shit about anyone but themselves.

Everything bad they say about Trump is true for Barack H. Obama.

He's a self-centered prick that never should have been invited to walk into the White House, much less actually live there.

 

[Lisa558]

Obama is the reason you don't want some commie *** ass-raping your son.

They tend to go off the deep end and don't give a shit about anyone but themselves.

Everything bad they say about Trump is true for Barack H. Obama.

He's a self-centered prick that never should have been invited to walk into the White House, much less actually live there.

He got in because he was black. Can you imagine if a white candidate was a member of a church whose pastor damned America? And exposed his children to that? That would have been the end of his candidacy.

But Obama had Black Privilege, and so the Democrats rallied around him.

 

[Polishprince]

Sounds like B. Hussein O is advocating for NAMBLA's point of view here. NAMBLA has also thought it was a great idea for young males to have adult gay mentors, no?

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Obammy wants to be the leader of the Gay Groomers.

 

[Polishprince]

Obammy wants to be the leader of the Gay Groomers.

View attachment 1138867View attachment 1138868

Years ago, Newsweek outed B. Hussein O as America's first Homo president.

Newsweek is a leftist rag, of course, it isn't exactly a secret. They put Barry's photo on the cover.

 

[mudwhistle]

He got in because he was black. Can you imagine if a white candidate was a member of a church whose pastor damned America? And exposed his children to that? That would have been the end of his candidacy.

But Obama had Black Privilege, and so the Democrats rallied around him.

They just wanted him in so they could put insane judges on the bench.

 

[Midnight FM]

He should have emphasized that what boys (and girls, too) need more than anything is living in a home with married parents.

It doesn't matter whether they are "legally" married or not. Marriage is juts a legal or ceremonial formality, and there are arguably outdated aspects of it. Such as the notion of spending excessively on a ceremony and trappings which may very well end in divorce or separation.

But that would imply that the cause of the problems in the black ghettos is that 75% of kids are born out-of-wedlock, and mostly to women who can’t afford to support them.

It's a moot point. The simple presence of the father wouldn't guarantee that he could support them, or that he would be a good role model.[/quote][/QUOTE]

 

[80zephyr]

It doesn't matter whether they are "legally" married or not. Marriage is juts a legal or ceremonial formality, and there are arguably outdated aspects of it. Such as the notion of spending excessively on a ceremony and trappings which may very well end in divorce or separation.


It's a moot point. The simple presence of the father wouldn't guarantee that he could support them, or that he would be a good role model.

[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]

Logic and reason show it works in intact households. Or do you think men would stay in the house and not have any responsibility?

 

[Lisa558]

It doesn't matter whether they are "legally" married or not. Marriage is juts a legal or ceremonial formality, and there are arguably outdated aspects of it. Such as the notion of spending excessively on a ceremony and trappings which may very well end in divorce or separation.


It's a moot point. The simple presence of the father wouldn't guarantee that he could support them, or that he would be a good role model.

[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]
Studies repeatedly show that children who grow up in homes with both parents do better than those who don’t.

Why work so hard to deny that much of the problem in the black ghetto is caused by the shamefully high illegitimacy rate? This is the root of the other problems that correlate with it - high crime rate, high poverty rate, low educational rate.

 

[BothWings]

Obama is the reason you don't want some commie *** ass-raping your son.

They tend to go off the deep end and don't give a shit about anyone but themselves.

Everything bad they say about Trump is true for Barack H. Obama.

He's a self-centered prick that never should have been invited to walk into the White House, much less actually live there.

The Dems support LGBTQ in youths, because once they convince them to experiment and those kids start getting rejected, bullied or ignored by straight kids, the Dems step in and start being their gallant defenders. Voila. (D)-voter for life. They are able to pull this off in DROVES now. And if not for this systematic cultivation and harvesting of LGBTQ youth as a voter base, the Dems would be never win any elections anymore. They depend on it. I think if the Republicans adopted Bill Clinton's don't ask/don't tell posture, they could take some LGBTQ votes back. Don't ask/don't tell was the best and fairest policy for all. Even though it was mostly just applied to the military it can still be a general social attitude that if applied across the board everywhere, would prevent straights and gays from feeling each is trying to push around the other in politics. Then we can push that god damn issue out of the way and get back to just making choices which are right for our economy and National security, and especially for our children.

The Dems are literally cultivating and harvesting LGBTQ to turn them into a voter base. And that's because the Dems have plans for using and raping our economy just like CEOs do with the corporations that they run into the ground and then escape with their parachutes. It's not something anyone in there right mind would vote for.... Except maybe someone who was absolutely fixated on a special interest and can't see past it as long as they're getting a pat in the head for it.

 

[mudwhistle]

The Dems support LGBTQ in youths, because once they convince them to experiment and those kids start getting rejected, bullied or ignored by straight kids, the Dems step in and start being their gallant defenders. Voila. (D)-voter for life. They are able to pull this off in DROVES now. And if not for this systematic cultivation and harvesting of LGBTQ youth as a voter base, the Dems would be never win any elections anymore. They depend on it. I think if the Republicans adopted Bill Clinton's don't ask/don't tell posture, they could take some LGBTQ votes back. Don't ask/don't tell was the best and fairest policy for all. Even though it was mostly just applied to the military it can still be a general social attitude that if applied across the board everywhere, would prevent straights and gays from feeling each is trying to push around the other in politics. Then we can push that god damn issue out of the way and get back to just making choices which are right for our economy and National security, and especially for our children.

The Dems are literally cultivating and harvesting LGBTQ to turn them into a voter base. And that's because the Dems have plans for using and raping our economy just like CEOs do with the corporations that they run into the ground and then escape with their parachutes. It's not something anyone in there right mind would vote for.... Except maybe someone who was absolutely fixated on a special interest and can't see past it as long as they're getting a pat in the head for it.

No....they're trying to decrease the number of humans thru abortion and anal sex.

 

[Polishprince]

Lib control of the Government Education system has really increased the among of homosexuality as opposed to when I was a kid, or even more so since WW2 and the Most Tremendous Generation.

B Hussein O sees this as how to continued the Limped Wrist Revolution that has been going on in the USA. The number of Gen Z guys who are light in the loafer and taking it in the keister is a number far greater than what anyone would have thought at the end of WW2 when we defeated that ********** Hitler.

 

[Scoutster]

He should have emphasized that what boys (and girls, too) need more than anything is living in a home with married parents.

But that would imply that the cause of the problems in the black ghettos is that 75% of kids are born out-of-wedlock, and mostly to women who can’t afford to support them.

So he reverts to the gay stuff.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

It doesn't matter whether they are "legally" married or not. Marriage is juts a legal or ceremonial formality, and there are arguably outdated aspects of it. Such as the notion of spending excessively on a ceremony and trappings which may very well end in divorce or separation.


It's a moot point. The simple presence of the father wouldn't guarantee that he could support them, or that he would be a good role model.

Great. Another ******* data denier.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Ears is as queer as a $3 bill

 

[Lisa558]

Ears is as queer as a $3 bill

And the irony is that the Muslims he sides with would push him off the roof.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

And the irony is that the Muslims he sides with would push him off the roof.

It’s all about opportunity over consistency where Marxists are involved.