The post you responded to was about women giving their lives to save a fetus. Now, who is stupid?Take your Drama Queen show elsewhere, Brotch.
My ex was under no duress, other than her own selfish goals. **** that *****.
After being told that our daughter would most likely be born with Downs Syndrome, my wife said "you take what life gives you". And she's a Goddamn Liberal. Go figger.
Sort that shit out in your tiny brain,
On one hand, you finally admitted that this is exactly what it comes down to: ending the life of an pre-birth human being as a form of birth control. On the other, I have little to no doubt that you'll fall back to one of the other pro-choice positions (such as "it's just a blob of cells" or "it's not alive yet" or "show me one person using this as birth control") as soon as it becomes expedient.
Nope. I'm an Alabamian born and bred. My recent ancestors illegally immigrated here after the Russian Commie scum took over Poland.
As opposed to a fetus giving their life for a woman?The post you responded to was about women giving their lives to save a fetus. Now, who is stupid?Take your Drama Queen show elsewhere, Brotch.
My ex was under no duress, other than her own selfish goals. **** that *****.
After being told that our daughter would most likely be born with Downs Syndrome, my wife said "you take what life gives you". And she's a Goddamn Liberal. Go figger.
Sort that shit out in your tiny brain,
I haven't left a single child to starve, or ever advocated sending kids into war zones. I'm sure you have multiple links that verify that other pro lifers do, or you would never have said that. I'll wait for that...I want to know which of my fellow pro lifers are advocating such things.
The two issues have nothing in common other than being decisions being made by the courts.
The only problem I have with abortions is that I don't think abortions should be allowed after the first trimester unless the pregnancy endangers the mothers life.
As for SSM. I have lots of issues with the courts violating the 14th Amendment and Civil Rights Act.
*****SMILE*****
Welfare isn't a reward for lazy behavior. It's paying a little extra on your taxes to give the desperately poor the money to eat a meal a day and a shitty apartment so they can move out of the streets.
Those weren't labels. They were positions. You can call yourself "pro-life" but it doesn't mean shit if you're just talking about abortion. That's not all it involves. Abortion is just one small aspect of a wider problem, which is the cheapness our world assigns life. If you're not working to counteract this problem then it doesn't apply to you. If someone isn't making an effort to improve the lives of their brothers and sisters then they haven't earned the right to call themselves that.
Being for education and being for the current educational system are two totally different things. A free, high quality education is a human right. Every child deserves to go to school and acquire the skills to become a functional, contributing member of society. You can work for reform all you want but fundamentally that's what you need to believe.
Being against war has nothing to do with being against the military or national defense. Clearly a strong defensive capability is anti-war in that it literally does deter war from occurring.
Are you using "pro-choice" to mean "pro-legal abortion" or "pro-democratically making laws regarding it"? I can't tell.
You could, but you'd be shooting yourself in the foot. Keep it as an option and watch it be used.
You have to be vegetarian before you're allowed to defend women and children? What rule book is that in? Link, please.
That's exactly what I'm saying is a problem. We have waaay too many people using this title who haven't earned it and have no idea what it even means. Plenty just adopted it because it sounds good. Plenty more think abortion is the only issue that matters.
Good heavens, a pontificating asshead. You certainly like to blather. Meanwhile, what total claptrap. You don't have the moral authority to dictate what pro lifers must believe. That's the problem with baby killers....they think they have the authority to take life at will, and assign thought. Guess what....you don't. People don't have to pass a test before they're 'allowed' to speak out against human rights violations. Go take a nap.
Yes, you did.
It must be very convenient to be able to say you're anti-war with the current president being the blood-soaked Nobel Champion Of Peace who can murder over 25,000 people in six months in a country we weren't at war with, namely Libya, without Congressional Approval or a declaration of war..... Perhaps if Hillary gets in office she can beat him on the body count, without Congressional approval or a declaration of war, and get her Nobel Prize too.
*****CHUCKLE*****
Do you think I care? You're an idiot who thinks it's hypocritical to try to save the lives of women and children if you're not a vegetarian. I've heard a lot of fruit loopery from baby killers, but that's even crazier than the usual tripe.
ER..yes, it is.
