Are posters on United States Message Board the most well informed online?

[DennisPTate]

I am actually being quite serious in this somewhat "satirical" discussion and poll. I truly do believe that the posters here on United States Message Board are the most well informed plus intellectually honest that I have found so far online.

I will refer to the following discussion and poll as evidence for my theory.

Most of you are all wise to have chosen online names that do not clearly identify you. I on the other hand was kind of stupid or crazy or both to have used my own name online?

Zincwarrior said:
"The US dollar has been falling dramatically. " [Zinwarrior]

....

"In my opinion The David Menzies has done an excellent job of covering controversies surrounding the "Sean Feucht Worship Tour." I believe that Pastor Sean Feucht should form something along the line of a partnership with The David Menzies and get him to play the role of a C. E. O. who represents Pastor Sean Feucht on the huge topics of "Human Life having Infinite Value" to The Being of Light of near death experience fame who has in a sense "Evolved" or "learned" over infinite Time in the past according to my understanding of 1. The Antrhopic Principle, 2. String Theory 3. the nature of Energy of Quantum Vacuum 4. Tehilliard's Law of Complexity Consciousness as it relates to at least one variation on "Theistic Evolutionary Theory?" "




Christian rocker brings down the house in Detroit after facing Canadian censorship

Everybody here on United States Message Board understands that one thousand percent means 10X.

Thread 'Is President Trump 1000 percent better than Biden was?'

Dec 29, 2025

So, is President Donald J. Trump TEN TIMES BETTER, [one thousand percent], better than President Biden was, or not?

I personally am up here in Canada thinking that YES President Donald J. Trump, in spite of the fact that "diplomacy" isn't exactly his strong suit, [or should I saw Trump suit], was at minimum a thousand percent better than President Biden was?

I will go into one rather controversial topic to give you an idea of what I mean. I personally DO NOT LIKE TARIFFS! When President Donald J. Trump came out with suggesting Tariffs I really had very little idea of what in the world...

• DennisPTate
• Replies: 205
• Forum: Politics

• 
• 
• 

Is President Donald J. Trump ONE THOUSAND PERCENT better than Biden was?​

• No​

  Votes: 11..... 32.4%

• Yes​

  Votes: 21........61.8%

• Maybe, but I will need a few more months to see for certain how all of this works out?!​

  Votes: 2....... 5.9%

---

• Total voters 34

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Not the ones who think central banks should print more money to reduce government debt.

 

[DennisPTate]

Not the ones who think central banks should print more money to reduce government debt.

Thank you for this well informed comment ToddsterPatriot, I plead guilty to being a big fan of Economist Milton Friedman. But I feel that his advice cannot be properly understood by a Canadian, unless we also know about Economist John Hotson, Economist Harold Chorney and Economist Mario Seccarrecia.

If I have misunderstood the scholarship of all of these brilliant economists then you have my apologies in advance, but I believe that if I am terribly in error, YOU will be able to help me to understand the WHY and the HOW where I probably went off track?

Here is one way to look at this topic in a manner that could give some common ground to Canada Pierre Poilievre with whoever is chosen to lead Canada's New Democratic Party?

Zone1 Thread 'A Basic Minimum Income Supplement and the percentage of women who choose abortion?'

Nov 30, 2025

In a high percentage of cases where a woman chooses to have an abortion, money and obtaining an education and getting a better career in the future are cited as being major reasons for choosing to have an abortion.

An Unconditional but Taxable Basic Minimum Income for all citizens of the USA and Canada would almost certainly result in a significant percentage of women deciding instead to give birth to their baby, [even if they were to give their baby up for adoption, a less scary economy for the USA and Canada would impact pregnant women so that they would be less pessimistic about the...

• DennisPTate
• Replies: 23
• Forum: Clean Debate Zone

A 500 dollar monthly B. M. I. would likely cause what percentage of women to reject abortion?​

• Zero to ten percent would choose life if B. M. I supplement was instituted​

  Votes: 1..... 50.0%

• Eleven to twenty percent of women would likely choose life a B. M. I. was in place​

  Votes: 0.....0.0%

• Twenty one percent to thirty percent of women would likely choose life if B. M. I. was instituted.​

  Votes: 0....0.0%

• Thirty one percent to forty percent of women would likely choose life if B. M. I was in place.​

  Votes: 1.....50.0%

• More than forty one percent of women would likely choose life if a B. M. I. was in place.​

  Votes: 0....0.0%

• Abortions must be stopped through legislation, not prevented by a B. M. I.​

  Votes: 0....0.0%

---

• Total voters 2

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If I have misunderstood the scholarship of all of these brilliant economists then you have my apologies in advance, but I believe that if I am terribly in error, YOU will be able to help me to understand the WHY and the HOW where I probably went off track?

You believed people who claimed central bank printing should finance deficit spending instead of public bond sales.

 

[TNHarley]

LOL
Reality isnt much of a thing around here

 

[DennisPTate]

You believed people who claimed central bank printing should finance deficit spending instead of public bond sales.

No, I believed that true economists have concluded that putting MONEY, into the hands of Canadians and Americans, that was CREATED without putting those Canadians and Americans into a situation where they, and their children, and their grandchildren, are NOT like Economic Gerbils running on an endless allegorical treadmill of TAXATION and compound Interest Over Time, may well be the number ONE true and simple RESPONSIBILITY AND POWER of our elected officials?

Thread 'Should we Canadians apologize to the USA for how we acted from 1740 to 1775?'

Dec 11, 2025

I believe that we Canadians owe the United States an apology for how our ancestors treated our ally The United States from 1740 to 1775. It is my belief that the exaggerated obedience of Canadian elected officials to London made the American Revolutionary War almost impossible to avoid.

In our defence it is likely that an astonishing small number of our ancestors actually understood how Compound Interest Over Time was being implemented in order to turn American citizens into economic slaves who would run endlessly on an allegorical economic treadmill?

[Alain Pilote, The History of...

• DennisPTate
• Replies: 10
• Forum: Politics

[Alain Pilote, The History of Banking Control in the United States] :

The happiest population​

Benjamin Franklin​

We are in 1750. The United States of America does not yet exist; it is the 13 Colonies of the American continent, forming “New England”, a possession of the motherland, England. Benjamin Franklin wrote about the population of that time: “Impossible to find a happier and more prosperous population on all the surface of the globe.” Going over to England to represent the interests of the Colonies, Franklin was asked how he accounted for the prosperous conditions prevailing in the Colonies, while poverty was rife in the motherland:
“That is simple,” Franklin replied. “In the Colonies we issue our own money. It is called Colonial Scrip. We issue it in proper proportion to make the products pass easily from the producers to the consumers. In this manner, creating ourselves our own paper money, we control its purchasing power, and we have no interest to pay to no one.”
The English bankers, being informed of that, had a law passed by the British Parliament prohibiting the Colonies from issuing their own money, and ordering them to use only the gold or silver debt-money that was provided in insufficient quantity by the English bankers. The circulating medium of exchange was thus reduced by half.
“In one year,” Franklin stated, “the conditions were so reversed that the era of prosperity ended, and a depression set in, to such an extent that the streets of the Colonies were filled with unemployed.”
Then the Revolutionary War was launched against England, and was followed by the Declaration of Independence in 1776. History textbooks erroneously teach that it was the tax on tea that triggered the American Revolution. But Franklin clearly stated:
“The Colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters, had it not been the poverty caused by the bad influence of the English bankers on the Parliament: which has caused in the Colonies hatred of England, and the Revolutionary War.”
The Founding Fathers of the United States, bearing all these facts in mind, and to protect themselves against the exploitation of the International Bankers, took good care to expressly declare, in the American Constitution, signed at Philadelphia, in 1787, Article 1, Section 8, paragraph 5:
“Congress shall have the power to coin money and to regulate the value thereof.”​

The bank of the bankers​

​

​

​

Alexander Hamilton​

But the bankers did not give up. Their agent, Alexander Hamilton, was named Secretary of Treasury in George Washington's cabinet, and advocated the establishment of a federal bank to be owned by private interests, and the creation of debt-money with false arguments like: “A national debt, if it is not excessive, will be to us a national blessing... The wisdom of the Government will be shown in never trusting itself with the use of so seducing and dangerous an expedient as issuing its own money.” Hamilton also made them believe that only the debt-money issued by private banks would be accepted in dealing abroad.
Thomas Jefferson, the Secretary of State, was strongly opposed to that project, but President Washington was finally won over by Hamilton's arguments. A federal bank was thus created in 1791, the “Bank of the United States”, with a 20 years' charter. Although it was termed “Bank of the United States”, it was actually the “bank of the bankers”, since it was not owned by the nation, but by individuals holding the bank's stocks, the private bankers. This name of “Bank of the United States” was purposely chosen to deceive the American population and to make them believe that they were the owners of the bank, which was not the case. The charter for the Bank of the United States ran out in 1811, and Congress voted against its renewal, thanks to the influence of Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson:​

Andrew Jackson​

“If Congress,” Jackson said, “has a right under the Constitution to issue paper money, it was given them to use by themselves, not to be delegated to individuals or corporations.”
Thus ended the history of the first Bank of the United States. But the bankers did not play their last card.​

The bankers launch the war​

​

​

[Alain Pilote]

Chapter 49 — The History of Banking Control in the United States

This fight of the International Financiers to install their fraudulent debt-money system has been particularly vicious in the United States of America since its very foundation, and historical facts show that several American statesmen were well aware of the dishonest money system the Financiers...

famguardian.org

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

You were correct to put this under Satire.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No, I believed that true economists have concluded that putting MONEY, into the hands of Canadians and Americans, that was CREATED without putting those Canadians and Americans into a situation where they are like Economic Gerbils running on an endless allegorical treadmill of TAXATION and compound Interest Over Time, may well be the number ONE true and simple RESPONSIBILITY AND POWER of our elected officials?

Yes, believing those guys and their errors is where you went wrong.

 

[evenflow1969]

Well I am well informed through January and late March. During fishing season and duck season I pretty much just care about fishing, duck hunting, and an occasional day in a deer stand. Tomorrow is my last duck trip of the year. I will be playing catch-up for a while. I plan to start with the Charly Kirk thing. Lots of people around here have questions about it .

 

[DennisPTate]

Yes, believing those guys and their errors is where you went wrong.

That is a good and funny simple comment, but you will have to elaborate with specifics to impress the majority of the readers here on USMB?

 

[DennisPTate]

You were correct to put this under Satire.

I did know that that is how this idea would tend to be viewed, in spite of the fact that I personally was being serious!

 

[DennisPTate]

You believed people who claimed central bank printing should finance deficit spending instead of public bond sales.

Now, I have to admit that you have gotten my attention with the phrase "instead of public bond sales!"

Could you please explain further because I do feel that you may well be able to convince me that this might perhaps be an even more practical solution than what I am proposing?

Note: I actually worked at forestry for over twenty years and I inhaled a lot of power saw exhaust, [that could perhaps be even more detrimental to my sixty six year old brain than if I had "never inhaled" certain types of cigarettes as President William Clinton claims to have "never done]?"

I am not sure if I butchered the wording in that last paragraphs, but if so, that probably has something to do with me always inhaling any brand of cigarette that I ever smoked!

 

[leftwinger]

I vote NO. LibStain Board Stain Stain lie almost 100% of the time or quote lying tired old media hacks spreading DNC false talking points or Spinning tales. So 60% of the overall board (Stain) are ill-informed. Criminal supporting liars 24-7 if need be.

The board is 4 days behind the real world on lower profile stories. As they spend all time here and use old dinosaur media sources that are always late to the party//

 

[DennisPTate]

LOL
Reality isnt much of a thing around here

Define "reality?"

How about a reality film series where we try our best to set up The David Menzies, and / or The Worship Leader Sean Feucht, and / or The Pierre Poilievre and / or The Dr. Jordan Peterson, for relative fame if they are perhaps offered to appear a couple of times on:





What I have been proposing here on USMB is nothing less than a formula that could well result in a pretty serious BOOM in real estate prices, under certain conditions:

"There will be a sudden rush to buy farms, ranches, and homes in the country.

Thousands will attempt to flee from cities, hoping that a return to the land and

nature will provide security. There will be a growing urge to "get away from it
all"---and much money will be invested in land and acreage in rural areas by
people who have secret dreams of raising their own food and cattle and of
becoming self-supporting. The price of open rural land will continue to soar.

Acreage within 100 miles of most major cities will skyrocket out of reach to
all but syndicates." (David Wilkerson, The Vision, page 18,19).

 

[Invisibleflash]

Didn't vote. Don't know.

 

[DennisPTate]

I vote NO. LibStain Board Stain Stain lie almost 100% of the time or quote lying tired old media hacks spreading DNC false talking points or Spinning tales. So 60% of the overall board (Stain) are ill-informed. Criminal supporting liars 24-7 if need be.

The board is 4 days behind the real world on lower profile stories. As they spend all time here and use old dinosaur media sources that are always late to the party//

But my poll question does imply comparing USMB with other boards, and this may well be the least dominated by left wing posters that I personally have ever round online.

 

[DennisPTate]

Didn't vote. Don't know.



View attachment 1199853

DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA HOW RARE IT IS ON online discussion forums to find somebody with the intellectual honesty to simply admit that they personally, "Don't know?"

Speaking of "Indians" I read something fascinating yesterday evening about "The Warriors of the Rainbow" and about Chief Standing Eagle, [Mel Minitor] who travelled with his cousin near death experiencer Dannion Brinkley for about twenty five years, [or more now].

LightStream Productions

Producing and Providing Entertainment for FIVE Presidential Forums

lightstreamers.com

 

[leftwinger]

But my poll question does imply comparing USMB with other boards, and this may well be the least dominated by left wing posters that I personally have ever round online.

Oh. They say that. But if you include the phony Mac&Cheese gang, the YT, PeeKKK types etc. The TDS verminous louts I thought 60% leftist puke overall?
OK make it 50-50.

Twatter under Leon was starting to go heavy Trump supporters until the last Schumer shutdown. Then it became massively flooded with false propaganda Leftist maggots posting stories out of DC. Many were labeled D Congress names or Obama. Probably their staff with even less work to do, time on hands. That spurred a resurgence of Stain. I don't go much at this time.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Now, I have to admit that you have gotten my attention with the phrase "instead of public bond sales!"

Could you please explain further because I do feel that you may well be able to convince me that this might perhaps be an even more practical solution than what I am proposing?

Note: I actually worked at forestry for over twenty years and I inhaled a lot of power saw exhaust, [that could perhaps be even more detrimental to my sixty six year old brain than if I had "never inhaled" certain types of cigarettes as President William Clinton claims to have "never done]?"

I am not sure if I butchered the wording in that last paragraphs, but if so, that probably has something to do with me always inhaling any brand of cigarette that I ever smoked!

If you think the central bank should print more so that the government doesn't have to sell bonds, then you're wrong.

 

[Cassandro]

I am actually being quite serious in this somewhat "satirical" discussion and poll. I truly do believe that the posters here on United States Message Board are the most well informed plus intellectually honest that I have found so far online.

This is a three-part question which refers to being well informed (yes), intellectually honest (no) and online (yes).