Arabs and Israelis discuss partnerships for progress. Meanwhile, “Palestinians” are partners in backwardness and terrorism

No, I won with truth, justice and the American way!

You need to realize, an Appeal to Authority is a fallacy of logic.

No, an appeal to authority, if used improperly is a logical fallacy. If used properly, it isn't a fallacy at all. Scroll down in the link you presented to "

Legitimate appeals to authority"​

 
RE: Arabs and Israelis discuss partnerships for progress. Meanwhile, “Palestinians” are partners in backwardness and terrorism
SUBTOPIC:
⁜→ Billo_Really, et al,

How many of those 70% survive into these times?


(COMMENT)
.
Remember, of the 750K displaced persons, how many are still alive?
.
1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
I don't think any of them are alive today.
 
No, an appeal to authority, if used improperly is a logical fallacy. If used properly, it isn't a fallacy at all. Scroll down in the link you presented to "

Legitimate appeals to authority"​

Logic supercedes the fallacy. Just because someone is an expert, doesn't make them right. They could be a paid informant. Look at all the climate change experts that became fossil fuel whores! An expert can be bought and Israel buys a lot of BS!
 
Logic supercedes the fallacy. Just because someone is an expert, doesn't make them right. They could be a paid informant. Look at all the climate change experts that became fossil fuel whores! An expert can be bought and Israel buys a lot of BS!
So your argument is that the person being quoted isn't an authority? Really, that Rostow is a "paid informant"?
Do you have any evidence of that? Post #137 presents a lot of background establishing the bona fides of Rostow. Are you dismissing all of that out of hand because you disagree with his position?
 
So your argument is that the person being quoted isn't an authority? Really, that Rostow is a "paid informant"?
Do you have any evidence of that? Post #137 presents a lot of background establishing the bona fides of Rostow. Are you dismissing all of that out of hand because you disagree with his position?
No, that is not my argument. I'm saying just because someone is in a position of authority, the things they say should not be automatically treated as true. They could be paid informants? And in Israels' case, they probably are!
 
No, that is not my argument. I'm saying just because someone is in a position of authority, the things they say should not be automatically treated as true. They could be paid informants? And in Israels' case, they probably are!
Do you have any evidence of that or is it just a convenient way to dismiss the statements you disagree with?
Can you point to when in his career he became a paid spokesman for Israel?
 
Do you have any evidence of that or is it just a convenient way to dismiss the statements you disagree with?
Can you point to when in his career he became a paid spokesman for Israel?
This is a lie....

"...movement involves none of the atrocious purposes or harmful effects on the existing population it is the goal of the Geneva Convention to prevent...."

...and I will prove it right now!

WHO WAS IRGUN?
 
This is a lie....

"...movement involves none of the atrocious purposes or harmful effects on the existing population it is the goal of the Geneva Convention to prevent...."

...and I will prove it right now!

WHO WAS IRGUN?

Arguing with the former Dean of the Yale Law School is a fool’s errand.
 
Back
Top Bottom