Apple iPhone 7 Launch's with Black Male/White Female pics

[NCC1701]

Black babies born at 70% out of wedlock rate, black single moms using welfare at 82% clip, suddenly if a black man bangs white trash they become responsible? no way, 82 percent is accurate.

You libs love lying, why is that?

 

[NCC1701]

I said that is right in line with how the black man treats black kids and women, and there is plenty of data on that. If you had the brains to follow an argument I would not have to repeat myself

You can repeat yourself till your blue in the face, you still relied on unscientific polling as evidence.

I will hold your hand and supply data later, as usual I have reality on my side

Yeah, suuuure ya do. That's why the only "data" you've referenced so far turned out to originate from an unscientific poll. <smh>

And how are you gonna supply data? You admitted you're too ******* stupid to post a link.

So how do you think I did on other threads buttwipe? Still on vacation, but I did find it and I am correct about black kids as usual.

I have better things to do with my life than figuring out smartphone copy paste, don't give a shit if you don't approve

"figuring out smartphone copy paste"



<sarcasm>Yeah, it's ******* rocket science.</sarcasm>

Hey fucktard, you are due for another emoticon or something like that, you got nothing else so why not?

 

[NCC1701]

Well it is pina colada and cigar time. Bye for now.

 

[Faun]

WelfareUseHouseholdsWithChildren.jpg (600×525)
http://2kpcwh2r7phz1nq4jj237m22.wpe.../2015/09/WelfareUseHouseholdsWithChildren.jpg


81% just like I said, close enough to 82 percent.

LOLOLOL

Where to begin??

First... nothing in there indicates white women with black men, which as you reiterated -- is your point. You've now abandoned your own point in exhange of a chart you think benefits you.

Next... it's a chart indicating black households, not necessarily interracial families.

Next... the actual data that chart is based on, which you didn't post, indicates percentages based on cost per household, not percentages of households. That chart reflects blacks receive a higher percentage of welfare dollars, not that 81.5% of black households with children are on welfare.

What an epic fail.

 

[Faun]

WelfareUseHouseholdsWithChildren.jpg (600×525)
http://2kpcwh2r7phz1nq4jj237m22.wpe.../2015/09/WelfareUseHouseholdsWithChildren.jpg


81% just like I said, close enough to 82 percent.

You can repeat yourself till your blue in the face, you still relied on unscientific polling as evidence.

I will hold your hand and supply data later, as usual I have reality on my side

Yeah, suuuure ya do. That's why the only "data" you've referenced so far turned out to originate from an unscientific poll. <smh>

And how are you gonna supply data? You admitted you're too ******* stupid to post a link.

So how do you think I did on other threads buttwipe? Still on vacation, but I did find it and I am correct about black kids as usual.

I have better things to do with my life than figuring out smartphone copy paste, don't give a shit if you don't approve

"figuring out smartphone copy paste"



<sarcasm>Yeah, it's *******

as usual, nothing but lame insult, not even good at that you slackjaw fuckwit.

It is funny to watch you come up with your grade school taunts, nothing going on upstairs. Good gravy you are stupid

Black babies born at 70% out of wedlock rate, black single moms using welfare at 82% clip, suddenly if a black man bangs white trash they become responsible? no way, 82 percent is accurate.

You libs love lying, why is that?

You can repeat yourself till your blue in the face, you still relied on unscientific polling as evidence.

I will hold your hand and supply data later, as usual I have reality on my side

Yeah, suuuure ya do. That's why the only "data" you've referenced so far turned out to originate from an unscientific poll. <smh>

And how are you gonna supply data? You admitted you're too ******* stupid to post a link.

So how do you think I did on other threads buttwipe? Still on vacation, but I did find it and I am correct about black kids as usual.

I have better things to do with my life than figuring out smartphone copy paste, don't give a shit if you don't approve

"figuring out smartphone copy paste"



<sarcasm>Yeah, it's ******* rocket science.</sarcasm>

Hey fucktard, you are due for another emoticon or something like that, you got nothing else so why not?

Well it is pina colada and cigar time. Bye for now.

Laughing my ass off at all of the above. See post #228

 

[NCC1701]

WelfareUseHouseholdsWithChildren.jpg (600×525)
http://2kpcwh2r7phz1nq4jj237m22.wpe.../2015/09/WelfareUseHouseholdsWithChildren.jpg


81% just like I said, close enough to 82 percent.

LOLOLOL

Where to begin??

First... nothing in there indicates white women with black men, which as you reiterated -- is your point. You've now abandoned your own point in exhange of a chart you think benefits you.

Next... it's a chart indicating black households, not necessarily interracial families.

Next... the actual data that chart is based on, which you didn't post, indicates percentages based on cost per household, not percentages of households. That chart reflects blacks receive a higher percentage of welfare dollars, not that 81.5% of black households with children are on welfare. usp=drivesdk

You are something else, by even the low standards I have for liberals you are certainly king ratfucker. Liar or illiterate, I can't decide..

My point, for the third time, is that the data for black kids supports the original article on mixed race, making your dismissal of it bullshit. How come you can't grasp that simple concept? Typical liberal, if you cant understand or win, then lie.

Secondly, I would not be talking failure if I were you, as you can't seem to read. Nevermind your nonsensical bs explanation of the chart that you made up, the original source data below is quite clear that it is percentage households and not cash. Table A8 in the document, page 34


camarota-welfare-final.pdf


All right pick one mothertrucker, you are a monumental liar or you are monumentally illiterate. Which is it? you can pick

 

[Faun]

WelfareUseHouseholdsWithChildren.jpg (600×525)
http://2kpcwh2r7phz1nq4jj237m22.wpe.../2015/09/WelfareUseHouseholdsWithChildren.jpg


81% just like I said, close enough to 82 percent.

LOLOLOL

Where to begin??

First... nothing in there indicates white women with black men, which as you reiterated -- is your point. You've now abandoned your own point in exhange of a chart you think benefits you.

Next... it's a chart indicating black households, not necessarily interracial families.

Next... the actual data that chart is based on, which you didn't post, indicates percentages based on cost per household, not percentages of households. That chart reflects blacks receive a higher percentage of welfare dollars, not that 81.5% of black households with children are on welfare. usp=drivesdk

You are something else, by even the low standards I have for liberals you are certainly king ratfucker. Liar or illiterate, I can't decide..

My point, for the third time, is that the data for black kids supports the original article on mixed race, making your dismissal of it bullshit. How come you can't grasp that simple concept? Typical liberal, if you cant understand or win, then lie.

Secondly, I would not be talking failure if I were you, as you can't seem to read. Nevermind your nonsensical bs explanation of the chart that you made up, the original source data below is quite clear that it is percentage households and not cash. Table A8 in the document, page 34


camarota-welfare-final.pdf


All right pick one mothertrucker, you are a monumental liar or you are monumentally illiterate. Which is it? you can pick

Sadly, you're too ******* retarded to understand there's nothing in there which speaks to interracial relationships, which you have repeatedly claimed, was your point.

Oh well, c'est la vie.

 

[NCC1701]

WelfareUseHouseholdsWithChildren.jpg (600×525)
http://2kpcwh2r7phz1nq4jj237m22.wpe.../2015/09/WelfareUseHouseholdsWithChildren.jpg


81% just like I said, close enough to 82 percent.

I will hold your hand and supply data later, as usual I have reality on my side

Yeah, suuuure ya do. That's why the only "data" you've referenced so far turned out to originate from an unscientific poll. <smh>

And how are you gonna supply data? You admitted you're too ******* stupid to post a link.

So how do you think I did on other threads buttwipe? Still on vacation, but I did find it and I am correct about black kids as usual.

I have better things to do with my life than figuring out smartphone copy paste, don't give a shit if you don't approve

"figuring out smartphone copy paste"



<sarcasm>Yeah, it's *******

as usual, nothing but lame insult, not even good at that you slackjaw fuckwit.

It is funny to watch you come up with your grade school taunts, nothing going on upstairs. Good gravy you are stupid

Black babies born at 70% out of wedlock rate, black single moms using welfare at 82% clip, suddenly if a black man bangs white trash they become responsible? no way, 82 percent is accurate.

You libs love lying, why is that?

I will hold your hand and supply data later, as usual I have reality on my side

Yeah, suuuure ya do. That's why the only "data" you've referenced so far turned out to originate from an unscientific poll. <smh>

And how are you gonna supply data? You admitted you're too ******* stupid to post a link.

So how do you think I did on other threads buttwipe? Still on vacation, but I did find it and I am correct about black kids as usual.

I have better things to do with my life than figuring out smartphone copy paste, don't give a shit if you don't approve

"figuring out smartphone copy paste"



<sarcasm>Yeah, it's ******* rocket science.</sarcasm>

Hey fucktard, you are due for another emoticon or something like that, you got nothing else so why not?

Well it is pina colada and cigar time. Bye for now.

Laughing my ass off at all of the above. See post #228

Lol. You dumb *****

 

[NCC1701]

WelfareUseHouseholdsWithChildren.jpg (600×525)
http://2kpcwh2r7phz1nq4jj237m22.wpe.../2015/09/WelfareUseHouseholdsWithChildren.jpg


81% just like I said, close enough to 82 percent.

LOLOLOL

Where to begin??

First... nothing in there indicates white women with black men, which as you reiterated -- is your point. You've now abandoned your own point in exhange of a chart you think benefits you.

Next... it's a chart indicating black households, not necessarily interracial families.

Next... the actual data that chart is based on, which you didn't post, indicates percentages based on cost per household, not percentages of households. That chart reflects blacks receive a higher percentage of welfare dollars, not that 81.5% of black households with children are on welfare. usp=drivesdk

You are something else, by even the low standards I have for liberals you are certainly king ratfucker. Liar or illiterate, I can't decide..

My point, for the third time, is that the data for black kids supports the original article on mixed race, making your dismissal of it bullshit. How come you can't grasp that simple concept? Typical liberal, if you cant understand or win, then lie.

Secondly, I would not be talking failure if I were you, as you can't seem to read. Nevermind your nonsensical bs explanation of the chart that you made up, the original source data below is quite clear that it is percentage households and not cash. Table A8 in the document, page 34


camarota-welfare-final.pdf


All right pick one mothertrucker, you are a monumental liar or you are monumentally illiterate. Which is it? you can pick

Sadly, you're too ******* retarded to understand there's nothing in there which speaks to interracial relationships, which you have repeatedly claimed, was your point.

Oh well, c'est la vie.

Sadly I just proved you can't read, so your conclusions are just as retarded

 

[NCC1701]

WelfareUseHouseholdsWithChildren.jpg (600×525)
http://2kpcwh2r7phz1nq4jj237m22.wpe.../2015/09/WelfareUseHouseholdsWithChildren.jpg


81% just like I said, close enough to 82 percent.

LOLOLOL

Where to begin??

First... nothing in there indicates white women with black men, which as you reiterated -- is your point. You've now abandoned your own point in exhange of a chart you think benefits you.

Next... it's a chart indicating black households, not necessarily interracial families.

Next... the actual data that chart is based on, which you didn't post, indicates percentages based on cost per household, not percentages of households. That chart reflects blacks receive a higher percentage of welfare dollars, not that 81.5% of black households with children are on welfare. usp=drivesdk

You are something else, by even the low standards I have for liberals you are certainly king ratfucker. Liar or illiterate, I can't decide..

My point, for the third time, is that the data for black kids supports the original article on mixed race, making your dismissal of it bullshit. How come you can't grasp that simple concept? Typical liberal, if you cant understand or win, then lie.

Secondly, I would not be talking failure if I were you, as you can't seem to read. Nevermind your nonsensical bs explanation of the chart that you made up, the original source data below is quite clear that it is percentage households and not cash. Table A8 in the document, page 34


camarota-welfare-final.pdf


All right pick one mothertrucker, you are a monumental liar or you are monumentally illiterate. Which is it? you can pick

Sadly, you're too ******* retarded to understand there's nothing in there which speaks to interracial relationships, which you have repeatedly claimed, was your point.

Oh well, c'est la vie.

And you have posted exactly zero that supports your opinion, while both my links are consistent.

Oh well eh? You suck

 

[Faun]

WelfareUseHouseholdsWithChildren.jpg (600×525)
http://2kpcwh2r7phz1nq4jj237m22.wpe.../2015/09/WelfareUseHouseholdsWithChildren.jpg


81% just like I said, close enough to 82 percent.

LOLOLOL

Where to begin??

First... nothing in there indicates white women with black men, which as you reiterated -- is your point. You've now abandoned your own point in exhange of a chart you think benefits you.

Next... it's a chart indicating black households, not necessarily interracial families.

Next... the actual data that chart is based on, which you didn't post, indicates percentages based on cost per household, not percentages of households. That chart reflects blacks receive a higher percentage of welfare dollars, not that 81.5% of black households with children are on welfare. usp=drivesdk

You are something else, by even the low standards I have for liberals you are certainly king ratfucker. Liar or illiterate, I can't decide..

My point, for the third time, is that the data for black kids supports the original article on mixed race, making your dismissal of it bullshit. How come you can't grasp that simple concept? Typical liberal, if you cant understand or win, then lie.

Secondly, I would not be talking failure if I were you, as you can't seem to read. Nevermind your nonsensical bs explanation of the chart that you made up, the original source data below is quite clear that it is percentage households and not cash. Table A8 in the document, page 34


camarota-welfare-final.pdf


All right pick one mothertrucker, you are a monumental liar or you are monumentally illiterate. Which is it? you can pick

Sadly, you're too ******* retarded to understand there's nothing in there which speaks to interracial relationships, which you have repeatedly claimed, was your point.

Oh well, c'est la vie.

Sadly I just proved you can't read, so your conclusions are just as retarded

Moron... you ***** about black men with white women...

I am on a smartphone and can't post links but look up how 82% of black father white mother children end up on welfare.

...but then post an article about "black households."



I would remind you what a loser you are but I'm sure you hear that enough from your family.

 

[reconmark]

Actually, beyond stupid is lower class white folk too damned insecure to mind their own business when it comes to other people's marriages....

Marriages aren't under discussion. Advertising is under discussion.
It's possible to mind your own business so much that you don't see the product the interracial couple is advertising.

A shitload of money, research, and psychology goes into advertising. So if company like Apple is promoting their product using an interracial couple then clearly their market research indicates their product is not going to be hurt by a miniscule number of people who find that offensive.

Political correctness overrides money, research and psychology. The advertising is not following public perception, it is trying to create public perception.

The number of people who find interracial couples offensive is likely a fraction of a fraction.

The number of people who will just dismiss that advertising without paying it enough attention to "see" it is by far the majority. Advertising is directed to the most ordinary and broad spectrum consumer who are the most likely to see themselves using that product. Something other than that goes right into the consumer blind spot.

No, it's not creating public perception. Interracial couples are already becoming more common among 18-35 year olds and that is [roughly] their target market. They're appealing to a trend, not setting one.

Nobody said there were not becoming more common, I am answering you dumfuks saying there is a big rush of white women to black men. It is maybe more common, but most of the trend is with races other than black and no matter whose kids they make, black men still suck at child support and marriage. Good Women usually want a good provider and father, that has not changed no what leftist drivel you haul out

So you are basically butt hurt and reduced to throwing out as many stereotypes as you can make up because White Women are choosing Black and other men...lol.
Yep Good women want not only Good providers that want a man that is masculine, caring and self confident.
It's not our fault you are none of those things...

 

[Unkotare]

The media puts this stuff out there to make impressionable young minds think this is normal. ...

Men and women being attracted to each other IS normal. That might be hard for someone of a different 'orientation' to understand.

 

[theHawk]

Funny how they never show the fat ugly white chicks with the black guys, when that is the majority of interracial couples. Can't blame the black guys for wanting to be with even a fat ugly white chick over any black girl.

 

[Unkotare]

Absolutely ******* disgusting.

Why do you hate cell phones so much?

 

[Unkotare]

The media puts this stuff out there to make impressionable young minds think this is normal. Race mixing is anti-White.


Apple Events - Keynote September 2016

Why's it anti-white and not anti-black?

Also, if you don't want to hang around with people because of their color, then better for those of a different color it would seem.

Because for a nig to breed with a white improves the nigs blood line. Conversely when a white breeds with a nig it diminishes said bloodline. Therefore it is a gain for the nig at the expense of the white. No one can really blame a nig for wanting to improve it's bloodline. But one has to wonder what could cause such self loathing amongst white women to want to diminish their own blood line. Daddy issues, and self esteem are likely the prime culprets.

Throughout the history of this country Black people have been improving the bloodline of white trash...don't be mad because your bloodline was beneath white trash...

Um, all humans share a bloodline......

 

[Unkotare]

I've noticed an increase in mixed relationships in ads. .....

Maybe because there has been an increase in them in society?

 

[guno]

The media puts this stuff out there to make impressionable young minds think this is normal. Race mixing is anti-White.


Apple Events - Keynote September 2016

that is the real America

 

[guno]

I've noticed an increase in mixed relationships in ads. Also whites are typically depicted as stupid while browns are the smart ones.

They are trying to make interracial relationships normal. Once it's seen every day on television it will be acceptable. The media is doing the same thing with homosexuals.

you are the abnormal one , shit stain

 

[Unkotare]

I've noticed an increase in mixed relationships in ads. Also whites are typically depicted as stupid while browns are the smart ones.

They are trying to make interracial relationships normal. Once it's seen every day on television it will be acceptable. .....

You're too late, it already is.