Appeals court denies Trump’s plea to reinstate birthright citizenship ban

[Tommy Tainant]

Appeals court denies Trump’s plea to reinstate birthright citizenship ban

President signed executive order on day one ordering end to citizenship for children of non-legal permanent residents

www.theguardian.com

So much winning. It sounds like the judges were united on this joke measure. trumps rule by edict is proving problematic.

The appeals court denied the administration’s request for an emergency appeal, saying that the justice department has not made a strong case that it would succeed on merits. A concurring opinion written by a Trump-appointed judge said the administration had not convinced her it was an emergency.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Birthright citizenship was never meant to be for people who illegally entered the US.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Birthright citizenship was never meant to be for people who illegally entered the US.

View attachment 1081020

View attachment 1081021

Elon needs to make savings in order to finance trumps idiot court cases.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Bend Trump over the judge's lap and spank him.

 

[White 6]

Appeals court denies Trump’s plea to reinstate birthright citizenship ban

President signed executive order on day one ordering end to citizenship for children of non-legal permanent residents

www.theguardian.com

So much winning. It sounds like the judges were united on this joke measure. trumps rule by edict is proving problematic.

The appeals court denied the administration’s request for an emergency appeal, saying that the justice department has not made a strong case that it would succeed on merits. A concurring opinion written by a Trump-appointed judge said the administration had not convinced her it was an emergency.

Looks like he might have to find out, if he has any legitimate political power, by getting an amendment to the constitution or at least a change to law, through both housed of Congress, controlled by the Republican majority.

 

[DGS49]

An appeals court cannot go against precedent, which is clearly in support of birthright citizenship.

Only the U.S. Supreme Court can look at the precedent and decide whether it has been fundamentally wrong all along.

Betting odds on this are 50/50. While birthright citizenship is bullshit, from a Constitutional, logical, and policy standpoint, two of the "Conservative" justices are wobbly on the issue...Roberts and Barrett. It could go either way.

Regardless, Trump was right to raise the issue so that it can finally be resolved.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Looks like he might have to find out, if he has any legitimate political power, by getting an amendment to the constitution or at least a change to law, through both housed of Congress, controlled by the Republican majority.

Thats the thing isnt it ? He can get this measure passed through a supine congress. He just cant be arsed to do the work.

 

[justoffal]

Appeals court denies Trump’s plea to reinstate birthright citizenship ban

President signed executive order on day one ordering end to citizenship for children of non-legal permanent residents

www.theguardian.com

So much winning. It sounds like the judges were united on this joke measure. trumps rule by edict is proving problematic.

The appeals court denied the administration’s request for an emergency appeal, saying that the justice department has not made a strong case that it would succeed on merits. A concurring opinion written by a Trump-appointed judge said the administration had not convinced her it was an emergency.

That's good one more step closer to scotus where it will definitely be upheld.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

An appeals court cannot go against precedent, which is clearly in support of birthright citizenship.

Only the U.S. Supreme Court can look at the precedent and decide whether it has been fundamentally wrong all along.

Betting odds on this are 50/50. While birthright citizenship is bullshit, from a Constitutional, logical, and policy standpoint, two of the "Conservative" justices are wobbly on the issue...Roberts and Barrett. It could go either way.

Regardless, Trump was right to raise the issue so that it can finally be resolved.

It was resolved 127 years ago, and it will remain so resolved.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

An appeals court cannot go against precedent, which is clearly in support of birthright citizenship.

Only the U.S. Supreme Court can look at the precedent and decide whether it has been fundamentally wrong all along.

Betting odds on this are 50/50. While birthright citizenship is bullshit, from a Constitutional, logical, and policy standpoint, two of the "Conservative" justices are wobbly on the issue...Roberts and Barrett. It could go either way.

Regardless, Trump was right to raise the issue so that it can finally be resolved.

So the second could also be overturned by decree ? Thats very positive.

 

[Unkotare]

Bend Trump over the judge's lap and spank him.

Have you heard? YOU LOST.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

An appeals court cannot go against precedent, which is clearly in support of birthright citizenship.

Only the U.S. Supreme Court can look at the precedent and decide whether it has been fundamentally wrong all along.

Betting odds on this are 50/50. While birthright citizenship is bullshit, from a Constitutional, logical, and policy standpoint, two of the "Conservative" justices are wobbly on the issue...Roberts and Barrett. It could go either way.

Regardless, Trump was right to raise the issue so that it can finally be resolved.

This shouldn't even be an issue.

And of course no president has the authority to change the Constitution via EO.

This nonsense is motivated by racism, bigotry, and hate.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

It was resolved 127 years ago, and it will remain so resolved.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

It seems pretty straightforward to me. Is it likely that Trump hasnt read that far in the constitution ?

 

[Unkotare]

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

It seems pretty straightforward to me. Is it likely that Trump hasnt read that far in the constitution ?

It is more than likely that your trash country doesn't even have a constitution.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

It is more than likely that your trash country doesn't even have a constitution.

We have an unwritten constitution. It seems more robust than yours. Your constitution seems worthless when it is ripped apart by royal decree.

 

[Unkotare]

We have an unwritten constitution. ...

= you don't have a constitution.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

= you don't have a constitution.

Neither do you any more.

 

[Scoutster]

Scotus will make the final decision!

 

[Unkotare]

Neither do you any more.

Yeah, we do. I can go look at it any time. You can't because you don't have one. This would be a good time to STFU and pull your foot out of your mouth.

 

[0311]

Appeals court denies Trump’s plea to reinstate birthright citizenship ban

President signed executive order on day one ordering end to citizenship for children of non-legal permanent residents

www.theguardian.com

So much winning. It sounds like the judges were united on this joke measure. trumps rule by edict is proving problematic.

The appeals court denied the administration’s request for an emergency appeal, saying that the justice department has not made a strong case that it would succeed on merits. A concurring opinion written by a Trump-appointed judge said the administration had not convinced her it was an emergency.

Appeals court denies Trump’s plea to reinstate birthright citizenship ban

President signed executive order on day one ordering end to citizenship for children of non-legal permanent residents

www.theguardian.com

So much winning. It sounds like the judges were united on this joke measure. trumps rule by edict is proving problematic.

The appeals court denied the administration’s request for an emergency appeal, saying that the justice department has not made a strong case that it would succeed on merits. A concurring opinion written by a Trump-appointed judge said the administration had not convinced her it was an emergency.

This is basic Senior Year Civics. 47 exceeded his authority. Only the Legislative Brach has that power