APNewsBreak: Russian jet passes near US warship

[ron4342]

Hummmm ..... What a fragile person you must be not to be able to handle bold red print. One has to wonder why you use it to call me a name: "Use a spell checker, it keeps you appearing as an ignorant and inarticlate Socio-Facist Lieral Jack Ass"
Oh, and by the way, "inarticulate" is really spelled 'inarticulate,' "lieral" is really spelled 'liberal,' and "Jack Ass" is really spelled 'jackass." Perhaps you should spend some time with your spell checker. If you are so small you need to condemn me for spelling errors you should make damn sure you have none in your post. It really lets the air out of your attack.

My post was in bold red because I wanted to answer each of your points and I wanted to make clear where your statement ended and mine began. I have done it in the past and as you are not in charge of the board I will do so in the future. It is a shame you are so closed minded that when presented with truths you cannot disprove your only recourse is to resort to insults and name callings. I had thought better of you. My mistake! But then again, anyone who still really thinks we weren't lied into Iraq and who cannot recognize a war profiteer when proof is given to them certainly cannot be very smart.

Oh, and one final note, you condemn my posts and claim I have my facts wrong. Yet you are incapable of disproving what I posted <sigh> Maybe it is you who are the "Useful Idiot" of the right. You appear to be willing to swallow every piece of shit they feed you.

They were intentional mis-spellings - Jack Ass referred to the Denoncratic mascot , IMO if you associate yourself with their bankrupt ideologies and blatant propaganda you are a Jack Ass.

So far as war profiteers, they've been around since the revolutionary war. The same people profit off peace as well , they are opportunists , they are capitalists and some as Lenin stated will sell the Marxists the rope with which he wanted to hang them.

you condemn my posts and claim I have my facts wrong. Yet you are incapable of disproving what I posted

And you are incapable of proving it . You appear to be willing to swallow every piece of shit they feed you.

Why is this so difficult for you to understand. There are people who make a profit off of war. They take advantage of their having goods and services that the military needs. Then there are people like VP cheney. cheney pushed for and got NO-BID contracts for halliburton, a company where he had formerly been a CEO. The NO-BID contracts allowed halliburton to make huge profits. As a former CEO of Halliburton there is no question he had a great deal of stock in the company. It is common for large companies to give their CEO's and other top officers stock options as compensation for their work. As halliburtion made huge profits cheney saw his stock make huge gains. In other words, his behavior pushing for NO-BID contracts put a very large amount of money directly into his pocket. As VP of the country that was war profiteering and it was illegal.
It is one thing for a person to be able to make a profit off of war by supplying something to the military. It is something else to be a member of the government using their position to make a profit and that is what cheney did. EVEN RAND PAUL IS NOW CALLING CHENEY A WAR PROFITEER.
"On April 7, 2009, as Paul was on the cusp of announcing his senatorial bid, he spoke to student Republicans at Western Kentucky University. Recalling President Dwight Eisenhower's warning about the military-industrial complex, he noted, "we need to be fearful of companies that get so big that they can actually be directing policy." And the company he had in mind was Cheney's former home: "When the Iraq war started, Halliburton got a billion-dollar no-bid contract. Some of the stuff has been so shoddy and so sloppy that our soldiers are over there dying in the shower from electrocution. I mean, it shouldn't be sloppy work, it shouldn't be bad procurement process. But it really shouldn't be that these people are so powerful that they direct even policy."
Paul then indicated to the students that he believed that Cheney had used 9/11 as an excuse to launch the Iraq war to serve Halliburton's interests:
There's a great YouTube of Dick Cheney in 1995 defending [President] Bush Number One [and the decision not to invade Baghdad in the first Gulf war], and he goes on for about five minutes. He's being interviewed, I think, by the American Enterprise Institute, and and he says it would be a disaster, it would be vastly expensive, it'd be civil war, we would have no exit strategy. He goes on and on for five minutes. Dick Cheney saying it would be a bad idea. And that's why the first Bush didn’t go into Baghdad. Dick Cheney then goes to work for Halliburton. Makes hundreds of millions of dollars, their CEO. Next thing you know, he's back in government and it's a good idea to go into Iraq."

Here is the video;
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1Ez3iKqAmbA]Rand Paul speaks at WKU Part 2 of 5, 4-7-09 - YouTube[/ame]
How can you support a party that would allow a piece of scum like cheney in it?

 

[kidrocks]

Russia Test Fires Advanced Multi-Warhead ICBM…

They really think they can intimidate Barack Obama? . . . Wait, actually, they probably can.

Via Free Beacon:
Russia Tests Multi-Warhead ICBM | Washington Free Beacon

Russia’s military carried out a flight test of a new multi-warhead intercontinental ballistic missile on Monday amid growing tensions with the United States over the crisis in Ukraine.

The SS-27 Mod 2 road-mobile ICBM was launched around 2:40 a.m. EST from Russia’s Plesetsk launch facility, located about 500 miles north of Moscow.

“The main purpose of the launch is to validate the reliability of a batch of this class of missiles made at the Votkinsk Plant,” Defense Ministry spokesman Igor Yegorov told state-run Interfax-AVN.

An unspecified number of simulated nuclear warheads landed at an impact range on the Kura test range on the Kamchatka Peninsula, in the Russian Far East, Yegorov said. The distance is around 3,500 miles.

The SS-27 Mod 2 is Russia’s newest ICBM and has been touted by Russian officials as designed specifically to defeat U.S. missile defenses.

Mark B. Schneider, a missile specialist with National Institute for Public Policy, said there is evidence indicating the Russians have violated the START arms treaty by developing the SS-27 Mod 2 with multiple warheads.

“The original missile that Russia called the Topol M Variant 2 and we call the SS-27 was a single warhead missile,” Schneider told the Free Beacon. “START prohibits increasing the declared number of warheads.”

the lying ********** in chief is such a quivering mass of ***** that he is defeated before he even begins.

Against real adversaries, those who don't play by his rules, those who can't be cowed by the DISGUSTING FILTH in the LSM, he is shown to be what I've ALWAYS said he is...

A ****** ***** of a lying coward.

Putin is going to bend him over and **** him in the ass.

And he just fired an ICBM to let the lying ********** in chief know that he still has them and is not afraid to use them.

People, this is what happens when you send a lying ********** and a coward to the White House.

As to what Putin can or will do to Europe or NATO?

You gotta be kidding me, right? The lying ***** we have in office right now wouldn't do anything if Putin marched into Europe.

Remember, one of the first Foreign Policy acts of the lying ********** in chief and his lesbian Sec State, Hitlery, was to remove the missile shield we had promised to Poland and the Czech Republic.

Don't you scrunts that worship your pimp-daddy, the lying ********** in chief, remember that?

the lying ********** wouldn't do shit if Putin decided to take Poland or the Czech Republic or any other Country for that matter. He's a coward. He's afraid of Putin.

Here it is people..... It's too late to stop Putin. Not gonna happen.

And he doesn't have to invade Europe to influence them, to make them give him sweetheart deals, to make them buy his oil and gas at his prices, to make them bend over and grab their ankles.

Russia, under Putin, is seeking to be the dominant player in Europe and Western and Southern Asia. It's called 'Hegemony' and few, if any, of you have a clue how bad we're getting fucked in all this.

But then again, most of you are dimocraps, which means you are stupid beyond belief.

God, it gives me great pleasure to see and witness that just the very presence of President Obama... is 'still a source of enormous angst and rage' for Edgetho"

Good to see Edgetho's head explode at the very mention of President Obama.

President Obama. President Obama. President Obama!

 

[Avatar4321]

Because clearly enraging Edge clearly makes up for the incompetence of leadership. Enraging your fellow Americans is much more important than our national security.

 

[kidrocks]

Because clearly enraging Edge clearly makes up for the incompetence of leadership. Enraging your fellow Americans is much more important than our national security.

Our country is getting better and our national security doing well thank you President Obama. Have you read the latest headlines? Read and rejoice.


CBO lowers costs of Obamacare by billions | MSNBC

The Congressional Budget Office this week lowered both the short- and long-term costs of Obamacare by billions of dollars.

A new report released Monday estimated the Affordable Care Act’s net cost for 2014 at $36 billion, $5 billion less than the past figure for the year, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation and CBO. Additionally, officials anticipate an overall price tag of $1,383 billion between 2015 and 2024, $104 billion less than previous projections. Premiums through an exchange marketplace will likely be lower than first expected.

 

[kidrocks]

Because clearly enraging Edge clearly makes up for the incompetence of leadership. Enraging your fellow Americans is much more important than our national security.

Swish! Right over your head I see.

Edgetho in his hatred for President Obama is clearly deranged. Can't you see that? Can't you read that? Open your eyes Avatar.

 

[Camp]

Because clearly enraging Edge clearly makes up for the incompetence of leadership. Enraging your fellow Americans is much more important than our national security.

Swish! Right over your head I see.

Edgetho in his hatred for President Obama is clearly deranged. Can't you see that? Can't you read that? Open your eyes Avatar.

Some folks just love Pom Poms and cheerleaders, no matter what team they are cheering for. Cheering for Putin may be a bit beyond acceptable for an American at this particular time, but it is a free country. I kind of find it rather unbelievable that a combat veteran would stoop so low as to cheer for the enemy while our troops are in harms way and danger, but it is what it is.

 

[depotoo]

Because clearly enraging Edge clearly makes up for the incompetence of leadership. Enraging your fellow Americans is much more important than our national security.

Swish! Right over your head I see.

Edgetho in his hatred for President Obama is clearly deranged. Can't you see that? Can't you read that? Open your eyes Avatar.

how ya doin, kid?

 

[Katzndogz]

Because clearly enraging Edge clearly makes up for the incompetence of leadership. Enraging your fellow Americans is much more important than our national security.

Swish! Right over your head I see.

Edgetho in his hatred for President Obama is clearly deranged. Can't you see that? Can't you read that? Open your eyes Avatar.

Some folks just love Pom Poms and cheerleaders, no matter what team they are cheering for. Cheering for Putin may be a bit beyond acceptable for an American at this particular time, but it is a free country. I kind of find it rather unbelievable that a combat veteran would stoop so low as to cheer for the enemy while our troops are in harms way and danger, but it is what it is.

If we have troops in Ukraine in harms way, obama put them there. The enemy IS obama, and cheering for a victory over the enemy is acceptable.

 

[kidrocks]

Because clearly enraging Edge clearly makes up for the incompetence of leadership. Enraging your fellow Americans is much more important than our national security.

Swish! Right over your head I see.

Edgetho in his hatred for President Obama is clearly deranged. Can't you see that? Can't you read that? Open your eyes Avatar.

how ya doin, kid?

Doing well. Just kinda bored right now. When I'm bored I usually come here to goof off and have a little fun with my conservative friends at their expense but it's not happening today... yet. Yawn. Maybe I'll take a nap.

 

[depotoo]

Swish! Right over your head I see.

Edgetho in his hatred for President Obama is clearly deranged. Can't you see that? Can't you read that? Open your eyes Avatar.

how ya doin, kid?

Doing well. Just kinda bored right now. When I'm bored I usually come here to goof off and have a little fun with my conservative friends at their expense but it's not happening today... yet. Yawn. Maybe I'll take a nap.

Yeah, that other site doesn't take too kindly to yourr lying, anymore. I understand why you found this one.

Good thing that jet didn't make a wrong move.

 

[Camp]

Swish! Right over your head I see.

Edgetho in his hatred for President Obama is clearly deranged. Can't you see that? Can't you read that? Open your eyes Avatar.

Some folks just love Pom Poms and cheerleaders, no matter what team they are cheering for. Cheering for Putin may be a bit beyond acceptable for an American at this particular time, but it is a free country. I kind of find it rather unbelievable that a combat veteran would stoop so low as to cheer for the enemy while our troops are in harms way and danger, but it is what it is.

If we have troops in Ukraine in harms way, obama put them there. The enemy IS obama, and cheering for a victory over the enemy is acceptable.

No, you are just so delusional and such a huge asshole that you will search and fool yourself into believing anything to justify your obsessive hatred for the guy your country elected to be President. You don't really believe in America and the American Constitution.
So here is why you are such a delusional asshole. American troops are not in Ukraine. They are in surrounding countries and are obligated by treaty and the honor of our nation to defend those countries. They have been there for over a half a century. 65 years to be exact.
NATO was started in April of 1949 during the Presidency of Harry Truman. It has been endorsed and supported by every President and every Congress continuously without exception ever since it's beginning. Obama didn't put our forces in harms way. Putin put them in harms way.

 

[HenryBHough]

Obama didn't put our forces in harms way. Putin put them in harms way.

Wow!

Until now I had no idea Your New Messiah had delegated placement of (former?) American forces to an effective leader!

 

[Politico]

Well this was a non event lol.

 

[bendog]

Not for Russia. Putin played this to the hilt to show Russians they can emasculate the US Navy.

But, Obama behaved like an adult, so we can all be proud of his tolerance.

 

[Camp]

Obama didn't put our forces in harms way. Putin put them in harms way.

Wow!

Until now I had no idea Your New Messiah had delegated placement of (former?) American forces to an effective leader!

I knew my comment would bring out more cheerleaders and Putin worshipers. Can't you be more original than that old worn out Messiah thing? Put on your prettiest cheerleader skirt and most colorful rainbow POM POM's and try again.

 

[GreenBean]

They were intentional mis-spellings - Jack Ass referred to the Denoncratic mascot , IMO if you associate yourself with their bankrupt ideologies and blatant propaganda you are a Jack Ass.

So far as war profiteers, they've been around since the revolutionary war. The same people profit off peace as well , they are opportunists , they are capitalists and some as Lenin stated will sell the Marxists the rope with which he wanted to hang them.

And you are incapable of proving it . You appear to be willing to swallow every piece of shit they feed you.

Why is this so difficult for you to understand. There are people who make a profit off of war. They take advantage of their having goods and services that the military needs. Then there are people like VP cheney. cheney pushed for and got NO-BID contracts for halliburton, a company where he had formerly been a CEO. The NO-BID contracts allowed halliburton to make huge profits. As a former CEO of Halliburton there is no question he had a great deal of stock in the company. It is common for large companies to give their CEO's and other top officers stock options as compensation for their work. As halliburtion made huge profits cheney saw his stock make huge gains. In other words, his behavior pushing for NO-BID contracts put a very large amount of money directly into his pocket. As VP of the country that was war profiteering and it was illegal.
It is one thing for a person to be able to make a profit off of war by supplying something to the military. It is something else to be a member of the government using their position to make a profit and that is what cheney did. EVEN RAND PAUL IS NOW CALLING CHENEY A WAR PROFITEER.
"On April 7, 2009, as Paul was on the cusp of announcing his senatorial bid, he spoke to student Republicans at Western Kentucky University. Recalling President Dwight Eisenhower's warning about the military-industrial complex, he noted, "we need to be fearful of companies that get so big that they can actually be directing policy." And the company he had in mind was Cheney's former home: "When the Iraq war started, Halliburton got a billion-dollar no-bid contract. Some of the stuff has been so shoddy and so sloppy that our soldiers are over there dying in the shower from electrocution. I mean, it shouldn't be sloppy work, it shouldn't be bad procurement process. But it really shouldn't be that these people are so powerful that they direct even policy."
Paul then indicated to the students that he believed that Cheney had used 9/11 as an excuse to launch the Iraq war to serve Halliburton's interests:
There's a great YouTube of Dick Cheney in 1995 defending [President] Bush Number One [and the decision not to invade Baghdad in the first Gulf war], and he goes on for about five minutes. He's being interviewed, I think, by the American Enterprise Institute, and and he says it would be a disaster, it would be vastly expensive, it'd be civil war, we would have no exit strategy. He goes on and on for five minutes. Dick Cheney saying it would be a bad idea. And that's why the first Bush didn&#8217;t go into Baghdad. Dick Cheney then goes to work for Halliburton. Makes hundreds of millions of dollars, their CEO. Next thing you know, he's back in government and it's a good idea to go into Iraq."

Here is the video;
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1Ez3iKqAmbA]Rand Paul speaks at WKU Part 2 of 5, 4-7-09 - YouTube[/ame]
How can you support a party that would allow a piece of scum like cheney in it?

How can you support a party that would allow a Kenyan born Communist to masquearde as our President. How can you support a party that would allow a gangster to serve as our President {Clinton, Kennedy} . How can you support a party that gave birth to the KKK . .........

 

[kidrocks]

Why is this so difficult for you to understand. There are people who make a profit off of war. They take advantage of their having goods and services that the military needs. Then there are people like VP cheney. cheney pushed for and got NO-BID contracts for halliburton, a company where he had formerly been a CEO. The NO-BID contracts allowed halliburton to make huge profits. As a former CEO of Halliburton there is no question he had a great deal of stock in the company. It is common for large companies to give their CEO's and other top officers stock options as compensation for their work. As halliburtion made huge profits cheney saw his stock make huge gains. In other words, his behavior pushing for NO-BID contracts put a very large amount of money directly into his pocket. As VP of the country that was war profiteering and it was illegal.
It is one thing for a person to be able to make a profit off of war by supplying something to the military. It is something else to be a member of the government using their position to make a profit and that is what cheney did. EVEN RAND PAUL IS NOW CALLING CHENEY A WAR PROFITEER.
"On April 7, 2009, as Paul was on the cusp of announcing his senatorial bid, he spoke to student Republicans at Western Kentucky University. Recalling President Dwight Eisenhower's warning about the military-industrial complex, he noted, "we need to be fearful of companies that get so big that they can actually be directing policy." And the company he had in mind was Cheney's former home: "When the Iraq war started, Halliburton got a billion-dollar no-bid contract. Some of the stuff has been so shoddy and so sloppy that our soldiers are over there dying in the shower from electrocution. I mean, it shouldn't be sloppy work, it shouldn't be bad procurement process. But it really shouldn't be that these people are so powerful that they direct even policy."
Paul then indicated to the students that he believed that Cheney had used 9/11 as an excuse to launch the Iraq war to serve Halliburton's interests:
There's a great YouTube of Dick Cheney in 1995 defending [President] Bush Number One [and the decision not to invade Baghdad in the first Gulf war], and he goes on for about five minutes. He's being interviewed, I think, by the American Enterprise Institute, and and he says it would be a disaster, it would be vastly expensive, it'd be civil war, we would have no exit strategy. He goes on and on for five minutes. Dick Cheney saying it would be a bad idea. And that's why the first Bush didn’t go into Baghdad. Dick Cheney then goes to work for Halliburton. Makes hundreds of millions of dollars, their CEO. Next thing you know, he's back in government and it's a good idea to go into Iraq."

Here is the video;
Rand Paul speaks at WKU Part 2 of 5, 4-7-09 - YouTube
How can you support a party that would allow a piece of scum like cheney in it?

How can you support a party that would allow a Kenyan born Communist to masquearde as our President. How can you support a party that would allow a gangster to serve as our President {Clinton, Kennedy} . How can you support a party that gave birth to the KKK . .........

Clinton, Kennedy, Obama... WINNERS!

 

[GreenBean]

How can you support a party that would allow a Kenyan born Communist to masquearde as our President. How can you support a party that would allow a gangster to serve as our President {Clinton, Kennedy} . How can you support a party that gave birth to the KKK . .........

Clinton, Kennedy, Obama... WINNERS!

A coke head rapist whore monger, Leader of the Irish Mafia, and a foreign born Islamic - Communist sympathizer - wow - yeah okay pal if you say so ....

 

[kidrocks]

Clinton, Kennedy, Obama... WINNERS!

A coke head rapist whore monger, Leader of the Irish Mafia, and a foreign born Islamic - Communist sympathizer - wow - yeah okay pal if you say so ....

I say so pal and so does America. Thanks for agreeing.