Antifa Explained: Very Informative Primer

[JimBowie1958]

As the cultural Marxism idols of relativism, atheism, humanism, and communism have become mainstream and now accepted by most, ...

Most Americans do not accept this bullshit, especially atheism which is less than 2% of the population.

In contrast about 20% of people in the UK believe the moon landings were fake and 8% of the US population believes that Big Foot is real and 7% think Elvis is still alive.

In the market place of ideas, atheism is an utter failure.

It is only main stream by our Establishment liberals and academics, the ******* idiots of our society.

 

[EverCurious]

It is a bit disingenuous to think that every person who voted for Clinton was a radical liberal, just as much as it is to presume that everyone who voted for President Trump was a republican. Both of these candidates were exceptionally controversial for various reasons.

Even if I had thought Trump was sexist and racist, I probably /still/ would have voted for him rather than Clinton. I dislike her that much, and ironically it's because of what the DNC did to Bernie - not exactly someone I, as a capitalist, have /anything/ in common with. However, I believe in the choice of the people, not the choice of the party (which is essentially what the DNC does via super pac's.) Bernie should have won that race IMO, even if they believed he wouldn't get as much support lacking the superficial catch phrases like "Glass Ceiling" and "Secretary of State" and "Experience," they should do what their /people/ want.

 

[JimBowie1958]

It is a bit disingenuous to think that every person who voted for Clinton was a radical liberal, just as much as it is to presume that everyone who voted for President Trump was a republican. Both of these candidates were exceptionally controversial for various reasons.

Even if I had thought Trump was sexist and racist, I probably /still/ would have voted for him rather than Clinton. I dislike her that much, and ironically it's because of what the DNC did to Bernie - not exactly someone I, as a capitalist, have /anything/ in common with. However, I believe in the choice of the people, not the choice of the party (which is essentially what the DNC does via super pac's.) Bernie should have won that race IMO, even if they believed he wouldn't get as much support lacking the superficial catch phrases like "Glass Ceiling" and "Secretary of State" and "Experience," they should do what their /people/ want.

I like Sanders for the most part, especially his advocacy of Nordic Model Socialism, which is really capitalism with a heavy does of regulation and public oriented policies, aka a 'mixed economy'.

The Nordic nations have done well with this and I think we will need something along these lines as the Robotics Revolution puts our unemployment rate into double digits within the next ten years.

 

[EverCurious]

~hisses and crosses her fingers~

 

[BULLDOG]

It is a bit disingenuous to think that every person who voted for Clinton was a radical liberal, just as much as it is to presume that everyone who voted for President Trump was a republican. Both of these candidates were exceptionally controversial for various reasons.

Even if I had thought Trump was sexist and racist, I probably /still/ would have voted for him rather than Clinton. I dislike her that much, and ironically it's because of what the DNC did to Bernie - not exactly someone I, as a capitalist, have /anything/ in common with. However, I believe in the choice of the people, not the choice of the party (which is essentially what the DNC does via super pac's.) Bernie should have won that race IMO, even if they believed he wouldn't get as much support lacking the superficial catch phrases like "Glass Ceiling" and "Secretary of State" and "Experience," they should do what their /people/ want.

So you are upset about how the DNC treated Bernie? Read this
Bernie Sanders Fans’ DNC ‘Collusion’ Conspiracy Theory is Embarrassing Garbage

 

[EverCurious]

It is a bit disingenuous to think that every person who voted for Clinton was a radical liberal, just as much as it is to presume that everyone who voted for President Trump was a republican. Both of these candidates were exceptionally controversial for various reasons.

Even if I had thought Trump was sexist and racist, I probably /still/ would have voted for him rather than Clinton. I dislike her that much, and ironically it's because of what the DNC did to Bernie - not exactly someone I, as a capitalist, have /anything/ in common with. However, I believe in the choice of the people, not the choice of the party (which is essentially what the DNC does via super pac's.) Bernie should have won that race IMO, even if they believed he wouldn't get as much support lacking the superficial catch phrases like "Glass Ceiling" and "Secretary of State" and "Experience," they should do what their /people/ want.

So you are upset about how the DNC treated Bernie? Read this
Bernie Sanders Fans’ DNC ‘Collusion’ Conspiracy Theory is Embarrassing Garbage

I cannot believe you just wasted my ******* time with that unrelated link...

Allow me to simplify since you've apparently mistaken my posting to be about what amounts to fake news influencing /shit/ - [despite the fact that my post says absolutely nothing about news reports, accusations, or anything even remotely in that vein]:

Essentially, the DNC super pac's decide the candidate, rather than the actual voting members (aka your average joe Democrat persons votes) - I think that is wrong. I believe that the super pac's weight infringes/oppresses the "democratic process" of selecting the D's candidate's.

 

[Iceweasel]

It is a bit disingenuous to think that every person who voted for Clinton was a radical liberal, just as much as it is to presume that everyone who voted for President Trump was a republican. Both of these candidates were exceptionally controversial for various reasons.

Even if I had thought Trump was sexist and racist, I probably /still/ would have voted for him rather than Clinton. I dislike her that much, and ironically it's because of what the DNC did to Bernie - not exactly someone I, as a capitalist, have /anything/ in common with. However, I believe in the choice of the people, not the choice of the party (which is essentially what the DNC does via super pac's.) Bernie should have won that race IMO, even if they believed he wouldn't get as much support lacking the superficial catch phrases like "Glass Ceiling" and "Secretary of State" and "Experience," they should do what their /people/ want.

So you are upset about how the DNC treated Bernie? Read this
Bernie Sanders Fans’ DNC ‘Collusion’ Conspiracy Theory is Embarrassing Garbage

Your link is garbage. Bernie won states and Hillary got the delegates. The dems stacked the deck with super delegates who were not beholding to the voters. But on the plus side it probably cost them the presidency.

 

[BULLDOG]

It is a bit disingenuous to think that every person who voted for Clinton was a radical liberal, just as much as it is to presume that everyone who voted for President Trump was a republican. Both of these candidates were exceptionally controversial for various reasons.

Even if I had thought Trump was sexist and racist, I probably /still/ would have voted for him rather than Clinton. - not exactly someone I, as a capitalist, have /anything/ in common with. However, I believe in the choice of the people, not the choice of the party (which is essentially what the DNC does via super pac's.) Bernie should have won that race IMO, even if they believed he wouldn't get as much support lacking the superficial catch phrases like "Glass Ceiling" and "Secretary of State" and "Experience," they should do what their /people/ want.

So you are upset about how the DNC treated Bernie? Read this
Bernie Sanders Fans’ DNC ‘Collusion’ Conspiracy Theory is Embarrassing Garbage

I cannot believe you just wasted my ******* time with that unrelated link...

Allow me to simplify since you've apparently mistaken my posting to be about what amounts to fake news influencing /shit/ - [despite the fact that my post says absolutely nothing about news reports, accusations, or anything even remotely in that vein]:

Essentially, the DNC super pac's decide the candidate, rather than the actual voting members (aka your average joe Democrat persons votes) - I think that is wrong. I believe that the super pac's weight infringes/oppresses the "democratic process" of selecting the D's candidate's.

You must really be confused this morning. The DNC set up a joint superpac with both candidates. Bernie chose not to use any super pacs, so the one set up with Bernie wasn't used. Did you expect Hillary and the DNC to not use their joint legal source of funds just because Bernie didn't want to?

 

[Iceweasel]

It is a bit disingenuous to think that every person who voted for Clinton was a radical liberal, just as much as it is to presume that everyone who voted for President Trump was a republican. Both of these candidates were exceptionally controversial for various reasons.

Even if I had thought Trump was sexist and racist, I probably /still/ would have voted for him rather than Clinton. - not exactly someone I, as a capitalist, have /anything/ in common with. However, I believe in the choice of the people, not the choice of the party (which is essentially what the DNC does via super pac's.) Bernie should have won that race IMO, even if they believed he wouldn't get as much support lacking the superficial catch phrases like "Glass Ceiling" and "Secretary of State" and "Experience," they should do what their /people/ want.

So you are upset about how the DNC treated Bernie? Read this
Bernie Sanders Fans’ DNC ‘Collusion’ Conspiracy Theory is Embarrassing Garbage

I cannot believe you just wasted my ******* time with that unrelated link...

Allow me to simplify since you've apparently mistaken my posting to be about what amounts to fake news influencing /shit/ - [despite the fact that my post says absolutely nothing about news reports, accusations, or anything even remotely in that vein]:

Essentially, the DNC super pac's decide the candidate, rather than the actual voting members (aka your average joe Democrat persons votes) - I think that is wrong. I believe that the super pac's weight infringes/oppresses the "democratic process" of selecting the D's candidate's.

You must really be confused this morning. The DNC set up a joint superpac with both candidates. Bernie chose not to use any super pacs, so the one set up with Bernie wasn't used. Did you expect Hillary and the DNC to not use their joint legal source of funds just because Bernie didn't want to?

The big money was behind Hillary, it wasn't exactly a secret. But we elect presidents via delegates in the electoral college system. Look into it.

 

[BULLDOG]

It is a bit disingenuous to think that every person who voted for Clinton was a radical liberal, just as much as it is to presume that everyone who voted for President Trump was a republican. Both of these candidates were exceptionally controversial for various reasons.

Even if I had thought Trump was sexist and racist, I probably /still/ would have voted for him rather than Clinton. I dislike her that much, and ironically it's because of what the DNC did to Bernie - not exactly someone I, as a capitalist, have /anything/ in common with. However, I believe in the choice of the people, not the choice of the party (which is essentially what the DNC does via super pac's.) Bernie should have won that race IMO, even if they believed he wouldn't get as much support lacking the superficial catch phrases like "Glass Ceiling" and "Secretary of State" and "Experience," they should do what their /people/ want.

So you are upset about how the DNC treated Bernie? Read this
Bernie Sanders Fans’ DNC ‘Collusion’ Conspiracy Theory is Embarrassing Garbage

Your link is garbage. Bernie won states and Hillary got the delegates. The dems stacked the deck with super delegates who were not beholding to the voters. But on the plus side it probably cost them the presidency.

Your claim about superdelegates is just as dumb as the previous idiot's claims about how super pacs gave unfair advantage to Hillary.

Donald Trump wrongly blames superdelegates for Sanders' loss

 

[Iceweasel]

It is a bit disingenuous to think that every person who voted for Clinton was a radical liberal, just as much as it is to presume that everyone who voted for President Trump was a republican. Both of these candidates were exceptionally controversial for various reasons.

Even if I had thought Trump was sexist and racist, I probably /still/ would have voted for him rather than Clinton. I dislike her that much, and ironically it's because of what the DNC did to Bernie - not exactly someone I, as a capitalist, have /anything/ in common with. However, I believe in the choice of the people, not the choice of the party (which is essentially what the DNC does via super pac's.) Bernie should have won that race IMO, even if they believed he wouldn't get as much support lacking the superficial catch phrases like "Glass Ceiling" and "Secretary of State" and "Experience," they should do what their /people/ want.

So you are upset about how the DNC treated Bernie? Read this
Bernie Sanders Fans’ DNC ‘Collusion’ Conspiracy Theory is Embarrassing Garbage

Your link is garbage. Bernie won states and Hillary got the delegates. The dems stacked the deck with super delegates who were not beholding to the voters. But on the plus side it probably cost them the presidency.

Your claim about superdelegates is just as dumb as the previous idiot's claims about how super pacs gave unfair advantage to Hillary.


Donald Trump wrongly blames superdelegates for Sanders' loss

Calling people idiots because they disagree with your moronic taunts is humorous. So you don't think Hillary had an unfair advantage with most of the money in her corner? The super delegates were committed to her, that's why they have super delegates. They discovered in '08 that a newbie could come along and upset the apple cart.

 

[BULLDOG]

It is a bit disingenuous to think that every person who voted for Clinton was a radical liberal, just as much as it is to presume that everyone who voted for President Trump was a republican. Both of these candidates were exceptionally controversial for various reasons.

Even if I had thought Trump was sexist and racist, I probably /still/ would have voted for him rather than Clinton. I dislike her that much, and ironically it's because of what the DNC did to Bernie - not exactly someone I, as a capitalist, have /anything/ in common with. However, I believe in the choice of the people, not the choice of the party (which is essentially what the DNC does via super pac's.) Bernie should have won that race IMO, even if they believed he wouldn't get as much support lacking the superficial catch phrases like "Glass Ceiling" and "Secretary of State" and "Experience," they should do what their /people/ want.

So you are upset about how the DNC treated Bernie? Read this
Bernie Sanders Fans’ DNC ‘Collusion’ Conspiracy Theory is Embarrassing Garbage

Your link is garbage. Bernie won states and Hillary got the delegates. The dems stacked the deck with super delegates who were not beholding to the voters. But on the plus side it probably cost them the presidency.

Your claim about superdelegates is just as dumb as the previous idiot's claims about how super pacs gave unfair advantage to Hillary.


Donald Trump wrongly blames superdelegates for Sanders' loss

Calling people idiots because they disagree with your moronic taunts is humorous. So you don't think Hillary had an unfair advantage with most of the money in her corner? The super delegates were committed to her, that's why they have super delegates. They discovered in '08 that a newbie could come along and upset the apple cart.

Yet superdelegates didn't determine the outcome. Your claims have already been shot down.

 

[Iceweasel]

It is a bit disingenuous to think that every person who voted for Clinton was a radical liberal, just as much as it is to presume that everyone who voted for President Trump was a republican. Both of these candidates were exceptionally controversial for various reasons.

Even if I had thought Trump was sexist and racist, I probably /still/ would have voted for him rather than Clinton. I dislike her that much, and ironically it's because of what the DNC did to Bernie - not exactly someone I, as a capitalist, have /anything/ in common with. However, I believe in the choice of the people, not the choice of the party (which is essentially what the DNC does via super pac's.) Bernie should have won that race IMO, even if they believed he wouldn't get as much support lacking the superficial catch phrases like "Glass Ceiling" and "Secretary of State" and "Experience," they should do what their /people/ want.

So you are upset about how the DNC treated Bernie? Read this
Bernie Sanders Fans’ DNC ‘Collusion’ Conspiracy Theory is Embarrassing Garbage

Your link is garbage. Bernie won states and Hillary got the delegates. The dems stacked the deck with super delegates who were not beholding to the voters. But on the plus side it probably cost them the presidency.

Your claim about superdelegates is just as dumb as the previous idiot's claims about how super pacs gave unfair advantage to Hillary.


Donald Trump wrongly blames superdelegates for Sanders' loss

Calling people idiots because they disagree with your moronic taunts is humorous. So you don't think Hillary had an unfair advantage with most of the money in her corner? The super delegates were committed to her, that's why they have super delegates. They discovered in '08 that a newbie could come along and upset the apple cart.

Yet superdelegates didn't determine the outcome. Your claims have already been shot down.

You couldn't hit the broad side of a barn from the inside.

Hillary Clinton ALREADY has the votes of 500 Democratic 'superdelegates' | Daily Mail Online
No wonder Hillary thinks she is inevitable: She ALREADY has the votes of 500 Democratic establishment 'superdelegates' locked up

• More than 500 superdelegates have already committed to Hillary Clinton, meaning she's one-fifth of the way to the nomination before any primaries

 

[Mac1958]

How long is it? I've only got about a two and a half minute attention span

Gawd, I'm glad I'm not the only one.
.

 

[BULLDOG]

So you are upset about how the DNC treated Bernie? Read this
Bernie Sanders Fans’ DNC ‘Collusion’ Conspiracy Theory is Embarrassing Garbage

Your link is garbage. Bernie won states and Hillary got the delegates. The dems stacked the deck with super delegates who were not beholding to the voters. But on the plus side it probably cost them the presidency.

Your claim about superdelegates is just as dumb as the previous idiot's claims about how super pacs gave unfair advantage to Hillary.


Donald Trump wrongly blames superdelegates for Sanders' loss

Calling people idiots because they disagree with your moronic taunts is humorous. So you don't think Hillary had an unfair advantage with most of the money in her corner? The super delegates were committed to her, that's why they have super delegates. They discovered in '08 that a newbie could come along and upset the apple cart.

Yet superdelegates didn't determine the outcome. Your claims have already been shot down.

You couldn't hit the broad side of a barn from the inside.

Hillary Clinton ALREADY has the votes of 500 Democratic 'superdelegates' | Daily Mail Online
No wonder Hillary thinks she is inevitable: She ALREADY has the votes of 500 Democratic establishment 'superdelegates' locked up

• More than 500 superdelegates have already committed to Hillary Clinton, meaning she's one-fifth of the way to the nomination before any primaries

So?

 

[Iceweasel]

So?

So you're full of shit and too stupid to know.

 

[BULLDOG]

So?

So you're full of shit and too stupid to know.

It's already been shown that superdelegates did not effect the outcome. Math is math. Numbers don't change just because you want them to. What have you got to show superdelegates are why Hillary beat Bernie in the primary, other than your continually making that claim?

 

[Iceweasel]

So?

So you're full of shit and too stupid to know.

It's already been shown that superdelegates did not effect the outcome. Math is math. Numbers don't change just because you want them to. What have you got to show superdelegates are why Hillary beat Bernie in the primary, other than your continually making that claim?

It's already been shown that it did. No one can understand it for you.

 

[BULLDOG]

So?

So you're full of shit and too stupid to know.

It's already been shown that superdelegates did not effect the outcome. Math is math. Numbers don't change just because you want them to. What have you got to show superdelegates are why Hillary beat Bernie in the primary, other than your continually making that claim?

It's already been shown that it did. No one can understand it for you.

No you didn't. I never said she didn't have superdelegates. I said she didn't need them. That's the part you can't disprove.

 

[2aguy]

They are simply the new generation of left wing brown shirts.....their forerunners murdered Jews in Germany, Kulaks in Russia, and city dwellers in Cambodia..........now they are reborn as theses asshats....