if you cannot understand the differeence between the two, i am not about to explain it to you.
i imagine it is relevant and if people want to pay for such ads, they are welcome to. i have no problem with it.
i'm certainly concerned about campaign finance reform.
Each time you are caught in another racist lie, you try to bluff your way out of it with nonsense like this. The fact is you have no idea if "Jewish" money or "Christian" money played a greater part if paying for these ads yet you want to see ads telling lies about who financed these ads. Even some one as slow witted as you are must realize that since US voters overwhelmingly support Israel, the vast majority of those who support Israel and Zionism are Christian, not Jewish, yet you continue to babble about Jewish money.
it would be racist if it were untrue. that is like if i said slave owners in the southern states were white and you said that's racist.
now, the papers don't say "jewish money" all the time but they sure mention a lot of people with jewish names and a lot of jewish organisations. i really cannot imagin a whole lot of us goyim in hillel or the jewish federation or flooding synagogues sating "we have to get those bus signs down.
and give me a break. if a vast majority of christians and christian organisations were protesting these signs, they sure as hell would be mentioned. te jewish people against the ads would exploit them to the max. get real.
oh...and in case you missed it, it was a presbyterian church that sponsored the signs in chapel hill.