Here you go again: Mr. Disinfuckingenuous.
It is amazing you can even post such shit after what YOU posted to start the damn thing.
Let's recall what happened earlier:
You see. This is where you show how disingenuous you are.
Here you say it's ME who redirected the thread to "by using a typical tactic of the nutter Klan: "If there is a problem with your 'side', point to the other side and say how bad they are!" -disregarding the FACTS of who made it this way in the first place.
Let's review, shall we? The OP is posted, most posters remark at how tragic was. I'll remind you a RW nutcase even posted this right off:
Not even knowing a ******* THING about the case, and decides it's a liberal.
THEN....your
first comment right after, was this:
Your next post - Implying sarcastically there was political motives involved:
Of course it doesn't say that. It does, however, say "well-known anti-abortion activist Jim Pouillon, 63, was outside the school Friday morning with a sign when a man drove by and shot him." I'm thinking the shooter didn't like the color of the sign.
I'll remind you my only two posts before your comments were in saying how tragic, that my heart goes out to the families - and mentioning violence is never the answer. No redirection - only sadness, and condolence.
Other posters were extending their condolences as well and remarking on how terrible it was.
THEN YOU! YOU! Bring up the message board and "how many people are cheering" - and then even suggest posters HERE are quietly cheering this death:
Oh, I read that. But I've also been reading the comments about this story on other boards and it's amazing how many people are cheering this anti-abortionist's death. I'm sure there are even some here who quietly cheering the death of this man because his beliefs were so contrary to theirs.
[emphasis mine]
A disgusting post on it's own. Disgusting.
Then I simply ask: "Show us who is "cheering his death.""
So began your little travail into who was even POSTING the rancid comments (where you could not even distinguish between the two.)
YOU Xsited, brought up the other message board, and claimed the WORST of posters here. And when asked to provide proof, you fell flat.
Flat as a pancake under a steamroller.
YOU redirected, YOU made it partisan, YOU implied the worst motivations. Then you have the nerve, the gall - to state it was ME who was redirecting - and it was ME who was making this a political case.
Your pity you should reserved for yourself, son - as it is a tragic case of projection here, and a sad, sorry attempt to rewrite the story here so that you can somehow feel bigger, or better about yourself - or something.
If anyone is living in a dream world, it's you, Mr. Projection.
You are every bit the partisan hack you claim not to be , and then throw off the sheets when you're little ploy has been exposed.
---> Ain't gonna work buster. The record is here.
---------------------
Pro-choicers are kind-hearted and non-violent. They can do no wrong and are supremely tolerant of opposing views. 
