Of course. There are serious questions about Biden's conduct in Ukraine and how criminal it may have been. Seems reasonable to want to provide any information they may have to our Justice Department.
Out of curiosity, why are you referencing the summary when you have the full transcript? Who wrote the summary, CBS?
Ok, if there were questions about Biden in Ukraine, the FBI / DOJ should have taken care of it, instead of president himself.
But a former ambassador to ukraine calls "questions about Biden's conduct in Ukraine",
utter bullshit.
Why does Trump need to
threaten the whistleblower?
I don't know, maybe because the President usually is the official to conduct foreign policy?
The former prosecutor, as you call him, is the one what was ousted in favor of the prosecutor who decided to drop the investigation so that Ukraine could receive 1.2 billion dollars in US aid.
It seems that an affidavit from the former prosecutor is now available to the public.
Shall we see where that leads?