Another complaint about our squat-to-pee lib news media

[Mac-7]

The lib reporter says “Warning, the video you are about to see is graphic”

We will have to take NBCs word for it that the crowd is beating up the driver because we certainly cant see it for ourselves

And then shows the viewers something that is so blurred that even the most effeminate pajama boy could see without needing a safe room to recover from the shock

This is becoming laughable

 

[citygator]

So your complaint is you need to see more graphic violence on broadcast TV? Excellent. They are remaking “The Running Man”.

 

[BothWings]

The lib reporter says “Warning, the video you are about to see is graphic”

We will have to take NBCs word for it that the crowd is beating up the driver because we certainly cant see it for ourselves

And then shows the viewers something that is so blurred that even the most effeminate pajama boy could see without needing a safe room to recover from the shock

This is becoming laughable

All you have to do is tell them that's what they're seeing and they believe it and repeat it. A few strobe lights, blurred images as if from a drugged out stupor....and they're hooked. May as well be MKUltra for Dummies.

 

[odanny]

They did the same thing on the nightly news last night (NBC) and warned viewers of what they were going to see, which was nothing at all, a wrecked car, blurred images, and dragging someone out of a car was all blurred.

I thought the same thing, what was there to be upset about? Anyone injured on the ground was blurred. If you were distrurbed enough from blurred footage you needed a warning, you should not own a television.

This is one time where I hope the guy who shot the driver is not caught.

 

[Mac-7]

So your complaint is you need to see more graphic violence on broadcast TV? Excellent. They are remaking “The Running Man”.

Yes, if it happens to be news I want to see it and decide for myself

 

[Mac-7]

They did the same thing on the nightly news last night (NBC) and warned viewers of what they were going to see, which was nothing at all, a wrecked car, blurred images, and dragging someone out of a car was all blurred.

I thought the same thing, what was there to be upset about? Anyone injured on the ground was blurred. If you were distrurbed enough from blurred footage you needed a warning, you should not own a television.

If you were distrurbed enough from blurred footage you needed a warning, you should not own a television.

What the lib viewers need is a lollipop and a petting pony

 

[MarcATL]

This OP tracks as everyone knows how much Republicans crave senseless violence.

They can't get enough of it

 

[odanny]

If you were distrurbed enough from blurred footage you needed a warning, you should not own a television.

What the lib viewers need is a lollipop and a petting pony

Admittedly, I'm surprised you watch the news. You don't sound like someone who does.

 

[Mac-7]

Admittedly, I'm surprised you watch the news. You don't sound like someone who does.

Dont project your ignorance onto others

 

[TimFitz]

The lib reporter says “Warning, the video you are about to see is graphic”

We will have to take NBCs word for it that the crowd is beating up the driver because we certainly cant see it for ourselves

And then shows the viewers something that is so blurred that even the most effeminate pajama boy could see without needing a safe room to recover from the shock

This is becoming laughable

That is a routine caution.

your pettiness is noted.

 

[Mac-7]

That is a routine caution.

your pettiness is noted.

Its lib stupidity

 

[RhodyPatriot]

So your complaint is you need to see more graphic violence on broadcast TV? Excellent. They are remaking “The Running Man”.

Quick question:

Are you actually this stupid, or are you just trolling?

Bonus round: Do you squat when you pee?

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Admittedly, I'm surprised you watch the news. You don't sound like someone who does.

"The news".

An outdated relic.

In 2025 "The news" is nothing but a nebulous term that could mean just about anything.

 

[JOSweetHeart]

If the people who attacked the driver are not going to get busted for their retaliation, the person who shot him shouldn't be any different. As far as I am concerned everything that was done to the guy was in defense of everyone who was there that night.

God bless you and each victim always!!!

Holly

 

[Moonglow]

The lib reporter says “Warning, the video you are about to see is graphic”

We will have to take NBCs word for it that the crowd is beating up the driver because we certainly cant see it for ourselves

And then shows the viewers something that is so blurred that even the most effeminate pajama boy could see without needing a safe room to recover from the shock

This is becoming laughable

So is yer need for blood.

 

[Moonglow]

Quick question:

Are you actually this stupid, or are you just trolling?

Bonus round: Do you squat when you pee?

I am sure you squat when you pee and like it.

 

[Silent Warrior]

This OP tracks as everyone knows how much Republicans crave senseless violence.

They can't get enough of it

LOL. It must have been Republicans doing all that peaceful protesting and burning cars in California then.

 

[Moonglow]

LOL. It must have been Republicans doing all that peaceful protesting and burning cars in California then.

You might consider that the are not either Dem or Repub.

 

[Foxfyre]

So your complaint is you need to see more graphic violence on broadcast TV? Excellent. They are remaking “The Running Man”.

There is something very suspicious when they tell us we are seeing something but dont' allow us to see it. Most especially with a MSM/so-called legacy media that is very short on journalistic ethics or honesty these days.

 

[Silent Warrior]

You might consider that the are not either Dem or Repub.

Perhaps, but I was just commenting on the foolishness of a post. One should not complain about the other side until cleaning up their own.