Friday night Tucker Carlson and Don Calloway each offer their side's argument.
Seems to me there is one clear winner.
See what you think:
Seems to me there is one clear winner.
See what you think:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Tucker pwns all basically because he is brilliant, funny and extremely quick witted.
My guess is Calloway agreed to pretend to take the establishment democrat/msm position. Nobody in their right mind can honestly believe "Russia collusion myth."
If the Trump team asks the Russki's to release some of H's classified emails from her bathroom server to win the election, is that "collusion"? Putin knew that the emails were golden if H won the election. Talk about blackmail...Clearly there was meetings between Trump’s administration and high level Russian official at a time when Russia was clearly trying to influence our elections.
Does it rise to the level of collusion… Probably. They investigation continues. If I was this new FBI director though, I’d keep the rental and not buy a house yet; he may have to be fired too.
If the Trump team asks the Russki's to release some of H's classified emails from her bathroom server to win the election, is that "collusion"? Putin knew that the emails were golden if H won the election. Talk about blackmail...Clearly there was meetings between Trump’s administration and high level Russian official at a time when Russia was clearly trying to influence our elections.
Does it rise to the level of collusion… Probably. They investigation continues. If I was this new FBI director though, I’d keep the rental and not buy a house yet; he may have to be fired too.
You have no proof of collusions not in sworn testimony or physical evidence. It's time to accept the fact once again you have nothing!Clearly there was meetings between Trump’s administration and high level Russian official at a time when Russia was clearly trying to influence our elections.
Does it rise to the level of collusion… Probably. They investigation continues. If I was this new FBI director though, I’d keep the rental and not buy a house yet; he may have to be fired too.
You have no proof of collusions not in sworn testimony or physical evidence. It's time to accept the fact once again you have nothing!Clearly there was meetings between Trump’s administration and high level Russian official at a time when Russia was clearly trying to influence our elections.
Does it rise to the level of collusion… Probably. They investigation continues. If I was this new FBI director though, I’d keep the rental and not buy a house yet; he may have to be fired too.
If the Trump team asks the Russki's to release some of H's classified emails from her bathroom server to win the election, is that "collusion"? Putin knew that the emails were golden if H won the election. Talk about blackmail...Clearly there was meetings between Trump’s administration and high level Russian official at a time when Russia was clearly trying to influence our elections.
Does it rise to the level of collusion… Probably. They investigation continues. If I was this new FBI director though, I’d keep the rental and not buy a house yet; he may have to be fired too.
Not sure. It's a hypothetical. What isn't is that a key advisor knew of Podesta being hacked 6 weeks beforehand
Clearly there was meetings between Trump’s administration and high level Russian official at a time when Russia was clearly trying to influence our elections.
Does it rise to the level of collusion… Probably. They investigation continues. If I was this new FBI director though, I’d keep the rental and not buy a house yet; he may have to be fired too.
If the Trump team asks the Russki's to release some of H's classified emails from her bathroom server to win the election, is that "collusion"? Putin knew that the emails were golden if H won the election. Talk about blackmail...Clearly there was meetings between Trump’s administration and high level Russian official at a time when Russia was clearly trying to influence our elections.
Does it rise to the level of collusion… Probably. They investigation continues. If I was this new FBI director though, I’d keep the rental and not buy a house yet; he may have to be fired too.
Not sure. It's a hypothetical. What isn't is that a key advisor knew of Podesta being hacked 6 weeks beforehand
Link? You're saying a Trump advisor knew of Podesta getting hacked 6 weeks prior to it happening? I call BULLSHIT in capital letters cuz I think you're flat out lying.
The fact that Trump's campaign officials met with Russian gov't reps or intermediaries before or after the hacking proves absolutely nothing. It is highly likely the Russkies also met with people in the Clinton camp too. As did reps from most other major players did.
If the Trump team asks the Russki's to release some of H's classified emails from her bathroom server to win the election, is that "collusion"? Putin knew that the emails were golden if H won the election. Talk about blackmail...Clearly there was meetings between Trump’s administration and high level Russian official at a time when Russia was clearly trying to influence our elections.
Does it rise to the level of collusion… Probably. They investigation continues. If I was this new FBI director though, I’d keep the rental and not buy a house yet; he may have to be fired too.
Not sure. It's a hypothetical. What isn't is that a key advisor knew of Podesta being hacked 6 weeks beforehand
Link? You're saying a Trump advisor knew of Podesta getting hacked 6 weeks prior to it happening? I call BULLSHIT in capital letters cuz I think you're flat out lying.
The fact that Trump's campaign officials met with Russian gov't reps or intermediaries before or after the hacking proves absolutely nothing. It is highly likely the Russkies also met with people in the Clinton camp too. As did reps from most other major players did.
Investigation has just began.You have no proof of collusions not in sworn testimony or physical evidence. It's time to accept the fact once again you have nothing!Clearly there was meetings between Trump’s administration and high level Russian official at a time when Russia was clearly trying to influence our elections.
Does it rise to the level of collusion… Probably. They investigation continues. If I was this new FBI director though, I’d keep the rental and not buy a house yet; he may have to be fired too.
Not crying. Laughing at your stupidity!You have no proof of collusions not in sworn testimony or physical evidence. It's time to accept the fact once again you have nothing!Clearly there was meetings between Trump’s administration and high level Russian official at a time when Russia was clearly trying to influence our elections.
Does it rise to the level of collusion… Probably. They investigation continues. If I was this new FBI director though, I’d keep the rental and not buy a house yet; he may have to be fired too.
If it were so obvious, you wouldn’t be responding for the 7th straight week and crying like a little bitch about it.
The investigations into the widening Trump scandals continues.
If the Trump team asks the Russki's to release some of H's classified emails from her bathroom server to win the election, is that "collusion"? Putin knew that the emails were golden if H won the election. Talk about blackmail...Clearly there was meetings between Trump’s administration and high level Russian official at a time when Russia was clearly trying to influence our elections.
Does it rise to the level of collusion… Probably. They investigation continues. If I was this new FBI director though, I’d keep the rental and not buy a house yet; he may have to be fired too.
Not sure. It's a hypothetical. What isn't is that a key advisor knew of Podesta being hacked 6 weeks beforehand
Link? You're saying a Trump advisor knew of Podesta getting hacked 6 weeks prior to it happening? I call BULLSHIT in capital letters cuz I think you're flat out lying.
The fact that Trump's campaign officials met with Russian gov't reps or intermediaries before or after the hacking proves absolutely nothing. It is highly likely the Russkies also met with people in the Clinton camp too. As did reps from most other major players did.
Six weeks before the release of Podesta’s e-mails…. yes. If I can show you a Trump advisor knew six weeks before Wikileaks publishing the e-mails, will you agree with me that it is collusion?
It's ended because it's a waste of money.Investigation has just began.You have no proof of collusions not in sworn testimony or physical evidence. It's time to accept the fact once again you have nothing!Clearly there was meetings between Trump’s administration and high level Russian official at a time when Russia was clearly trying to influence our elections.
Does it rise to the level of collusion… Probably. They investigation continues. If I was this new FBI director though, I’d keep the rental and not buy a house yet; he may have to be fired too.
Investigation has just began.You have no proof of collusions not in sworn testimony or physical evidence. It's time to accept the fact once again you have nothing!Clearly there was meetings between Trump’s administration and high level Russian official at a time when Russia was clearly trying to influence our elections.
Does it rise to the level of collusion… Probably. They investigation continues. If I was this new FBI director though, I’d keep the rental and not buy a house yet; he may have to be fired too.
If the Trump team asks the Russki's to release some of H's classified emails from her bathroom server to win the election, is that "collusion"? Putin knew that the emails were golden if H won the election. Talk about blackmail...
You have no proof of collusions not in sworn testimony or physical evidence. It's time to accept the fact once again you have nothing!