An Anniversary That Democrats Won't Mention

[PoliticalChic]

Tomorrow's date, October first, 1946, was the annoouncement of the verdicts for Nazis tried by the court.



1. On October 1, 1946, the Tribunal convicted 19 of the defendants and acquitted three. Of those convicted, 12 were sentenced to death. Three defendants were sentenced to life imprisonment and four to prison terms ranging from 10 to 20 years.



2. Interesting that the Nazis gave the Democrats 'credit' for many of their programs.
The Nazi Nuremberg Laws were taken nearly wholly from the Jim Crow Laws of the Democrat controlled South.



3. In “Hitler's American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law ,” by James Whitman, he shows how the Nazis took the Democrats’ Jim Crow Laws, simply changed the word ‘black’ and inserted the word ‘Jew.’


4. “Let’s remember that every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, and enforced by Democratic officials. The Nuremberg team carefully studied these laws that were mainly aimed at blacks and used them to formulate their own racist legislation mainly aimed at Jews.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats


5. From the LATimes:

“At a crucial 1934 planning meeting for the Nuremberg system, the Minister of Justice presented a memorandum on American law. According to a transcript, he led a detailed discussion of miscegenation statutes from all over the United States. Moreover it is clear that the most radical Nazis were the most eager advocates of American practices. Roland Freisler, who would become president of the Nazi People's Court, declared that American (Democrat) jurisprudence "would suit us perfectly."
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes





And, the winner in the category of unintentional humor, .......Democrats call their opponent 'Hitler.'


Why are Democrats glad Trump survived if he's a Nazi and ...
The Hill
https://thehill.com › opinion › campaign › 4774363-de...
Jul 17, 2024 — Democrats have been calling Republicans Nazis for years, and the recent assassination attempt on Donald Trump has exposed their lies and ...

 

[konradv]

Tomorrow's date, October first, 1946, was the annoouncement of the verdicts for Nazis tried by the court.



1. On October 1, 1946, the Tribunal convicted 19 of the defendants and acquitted three. Of those convicted, 12 were sentenced to death. Three defendants were sentenced to life imprisonment and four to prison terms ranging from 10 to 20 years.



2. Interesting that the Nazis gave the Democrats 'credit' for many of their programs.
The Nazi Nuremberg Laws were taken nearly wholly from the Jim Crow Laws of the Democrat controlled South.



3. In “Hitler's American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law ,” by James Whitman, he shows how the Nazis took the Democrats’ Jim Crow Laws, simply changed the word ‘black’ and inserted the word ‘Jew.’


4. “Let’s remember that every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, and enforced by Democratic officials. The Nuremberg team carefully studied these laws that were mainly aimed at blacks and used them to formulate their own racist legislation mainly aimed at Jews.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats


5. From the LATimes:

“At a crucial 1934 planning meeting for the Nuremberg system, the Minister of Justice presented a memorandum on American law. According to a transcript, he led a detailed discussion of miscegenation statutes from all over the United States. Moreover it is clear that the most radical Nazis were the most eager advocates of American practices. Roland Freisler, who would become president of the Nazi People's Court, declared that American (Democrat) jurisprudence "would suit us perfectly."
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes





And, the winner in the category of unintentional humor, .......Democrats call their opponent 'Hitler.'


Why are Democrats glad Trump survived if he's a Nazi and ...
The Hill
https://thehill.com › opinion › campaign › 4774363-de...
Jul 17, 2024 — Democrats have been calling Republicans Nazis for years, and the recent assassination attempt on Donald Trump has exposed their lies and ...

#RUZZIANASSET

 

[mikegriffith1]

Tomorrow's date, October first, 1946, was the annoouncement of the verdicts for Nazis tried by the court.



1. On October 1, 1946, the Tribunal convicted 19 of the defendants and acquitted three. Of those convicted, 12 were sentenced to death. Three defendants were sentenced to life imprisonment and four to prison terms ranging from 10 to 20 years.

2. Interesting that the Nazis gave the Democrats 'credit' for many of their programs.
The Nazi Nuremberg Laws were taken nearly wholly from the Jim Crow Laws of the Democrat controlled South.

3. In “Hitler's American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law ,” by James Whitman, he shows how the Nazis took the Democrats’ Jim Crow Laws, simply changed the word ‘black’ and inserted the word ‘Jew.’

4. “Let’s remember that every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, and enforced by Democratic officials. The Nuremberg team carefully studied these laws that were mainly aimed at blacks and used them to formulate their own racist legislation mainly aimed at Jews.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats

5. From the LATimes:

“At a crucial 1934 planning meeting for the Nuremberg system, the Minister of Justice presented a memorandum on American law. According to a transcript, he led a detailed discussion of miscegenation statutes from all over the United States. Moreover it is clear that the most radical Nazis were the most eager advocates of American practices. Roland Freisler, who would become president of the Nazi People's Court, declared that American (Democrat) jurisprudence "would suit us perfectly."
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes

And, the winner in the category of unintentional humor, .......Democrats call their opponent 'Hitler.'

Why are Democrats glad Trump survived if he's a Nazi and ...
The Hill
https://thehill.com › opinion › campaign › 4774363-de...
Jul 17, 2024 — Democrats have been calling Republicans Nazis for years, and the recent assassination attempt on Donald Trump has exposed their lies and ...

I have never found this argument convincing, because those Democrats were conservatives. If the Jim Crow Democrats of the late 1800s and early 1900s had been alive in 1964, most of them would have voted for Barry Goldwater. If they'd been alive in 1968, most of them would have voted for George Wallace.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I have never found this argument convincing, because those Democrats were conservatives. If the Jim Crow Democrats of the late 1800s and early 1900s had been alive in 1964, most of them would have voted for Barry Goldwater. If they'd been alive in 1968, most of them would have voted for George Wallace.

"...most of them would have voted for Barry Goldwater."





Nonsense..


"Goldwater was a vehement foe of segregation. He was a founder of the NAACP in Arizona, donating the equivalent of several thousand dollars to the organization’s efforts to integrate the public schools. When he was head of the Arizona National Guard, he had integrated the state Guard before Harry Truman announced he was integrating the U.S. military. As the Washington Post said, Goldwater “ended racial segregation in his family department stores, and he was instrumental in ending it in Phoenix schools and restaurants and in the Arizona National Guard.”

But he was also a believer in limited government. It was, after all, racist Democratic politicians in the South using the force of the government to violate private property rights by enforcing the Jim Crow laws in the first place. As Sowell points out, it wasn’t the private bus companies demanding that blacks sit in the back of the bus, it was the government.

Goldwater not only had personally promoted desegregation, he belonged to a party that had been fighting for civil rights for the previous century against Democratic obstructionism. Lyndon Johnson voted against every civil rights bill during his tenure in the Senate. But by the time he became president, he had flipped 180 degrees. Appealing to regional mobs wouldn’t work with a national electorate.

Unlike mob-appeasing Democrats, Goldwater based his objections to certain parts of the 1964 Civil Rights Act on purely constitutional principles. Along with other constitutional purists in the Republican Party, Goldwater opposed federal initiatives in a lot of areas, not just those involving race. By contrast, segregationist Democrats routinely criticized the exercise of federal power and expenditure of federal funds when it involved ending discrimination against blacks, but gladly accepted federal pork projects for their states.

Coulter, Demonic, chapter 10

 

[Ringo]

 

[mikegriffith1]

"...most of them would have voted for Barry Goldwater."
Nonsense..

"Goldwater was a vehement foe of segregation. He was a founder of the NAACP in Arizona, donating the equivalent of several thousand dollars to the organization’s efforts to integrate the public schools. When he was head of the Arizona National Guard, he had integrated the state Guard before Harry Truman announced he was integrating the U.S. military. As the Washington Post said, Goldwater “ended racial segregation in his family department stores, and he was instrumental in ending it in Phoenix schools and restaurants and in the Arizona National Guard.”

But he was also a believer in limited government. It was, after all, racist Democratic politicians in the South using the force of the government to violate private property rights by enforcing the Jim Crow laws in the first place. As Sowell points out, it wasn’t the private bus companies demanding that blacks sit in the back of the bus, it was the government.

Goldwater not only had personally promoted desegregation, he belonged to a party that had been fighting for civil rights for the previous century against Democratic obstructionism. Lyndon Johnson voted against every civil rights bill during his tenure in the Senate. But by the time he became president, he had flipped 180 degrees. Appealing to regional mobs wouldn’t work with a national electorate.

Unlike mob-appeasing Democrats, Goldwater based his objections to certain parts of the 1964 Civil Rights Act on purely constitutional principles. Along with other constitutional purists in the Republican Party, Goldwater opposed federal initiatives in a lot of areas, not just those involving race. By contrast, segregationist Democrats routinely criticized the exercise of federal power and expenditure of federal funds when it involved ending discrimination against blacks, but gladly accepted federal pork projects for their states.

Coulter, Demonic, chapter 10

Goldwater's Constitution-based opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Act is precisely one of the main reasons that late-1800s-early-1900s Jim Crow Southerners would have voted for him if they had been alive in '64. They certainly would not have voted for LBJ.

Even with LBJ's massive landslide win, Goldwater won five of the seven Deep South states, lost Florida by only 2.4%, and did well in the Upper South states, even though he lost the nationwide popular vote by over 22%.

When the children of those Jim Crow Southerners became adults, most of them voted Republican.

By the way, I wish Goldwater had won in 1964.