Whyte.Devyl
Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 95
- 7
- 6
INTRODUCTION:
In the real world we have all probably noticed 'interracial' couples before. Most probably never thought much of it and only noticed because it's unusual, but that was it. People are people. Most just go with the flow, some do not. That is just the way life is. Besides, if you know the FACTS, the rare miscegenated couple is not neccesarily all that bad of a thing. But then we need to notice something else...
Please note that this volume is not meant to demonize any person for whom they choose to marry. Far from it.
If you are one who is in a 'interracial' marriage, I wish you the best. There remains a distinct possibility that you may find this information to not be to your liking. It will depend on just how objective you are.
This is meant as a rational discussion of the rare phenominon of 'interracial' marriage and how elitists manipulate perceptions of it to their own insane ends.
Am I implying a superiority of one 'race' over another? No I am not, I am stating that different 'races' are just that, DIFFERENT.
Am I opposed to 'interracial' marriage in and of itself? No.
• I am opposed to the elitists lies that are being used to glorify a type of marriage that statistically does not have the same stability as same 'race' marriages.
• I am opposed to the elitist media attempting to direct reality, as opposed to their natural role of reflecting it.
• I am opposed to elitism, every single one of its commandments only brings misery to the masses.
Despite the speciousness of their arguments, marxist elitists are guilty of being the worst of all mass-murderers in modern history. One must ALWAYS thoroughly examine any aganda of an elitist, for they truly wishes to enslave or murder us all.
So what do the elitists not want us to know?
Observe this agitprop published by MSNBC:
Interracial marriage flourishes in U.S. - Race & ethnicity- msnbc.com
Black/White marriages are only 0.53% of all marriages, which has only increased from 0.13% since 1960.
~ That means 'Black'/'White' inter-marriage has gone from "radical" to "commonplace"?

United States 'Black'/'White' Miscegenation Increase
Year••Total Marriages•••Black/White Marriages••••Black/White percent of all Marriages
2000••54,493,232•••••••287,576••••••••••••••••••0.53%
1960••40,491,000•••••••51,000••••••••••••••••••••0.13%
Obviously, 'Black'/'White' miscegenation really is not that common, and it never will be. It is only commonplace in the elitist media. MSNBC is being true to their elitist form, they are perpetuating the illusion that 'Black'/'White' miscegenation is "commonplace".
Lets dissect what MSNBC published:
• They depict a 'Black' male /'White' female in the introduction photo, setting the tone for the article.
• Then they exclusively use 'Black'/'White' relationship anecdotes to fill out the story.
• Then they cite one of many, many propaganda films featuring a 'Black'/'White' couple.
• Then they cite statistics that were drawn on estimates for all inter-ethnic marriages, not just 'Black'/'White'.
They publish this to create the impression that the statistical analysis they are citing are primarily reflecting 'Black'/'White' marriages, which it does not. While they are correct in asserting that the rate of inter-ethnic marriages are on the rise, they are not disclosing the statistics of 'Black'/'White' inter-marriage, which is showing a definate decline.
Why does MSNBC and other assimilation theorists want people to believe that 'Black'/'White' miscegenation is "commonplace" when it is only 0.53% of all marriages? Why does MSNBC want people to believe that 'Black'/'White' intermarriage is 'flourishing' when the rate of new 'Black'/'White' marriages is drastically declining?
US Historical Increase in 'Black'/'White' Miscegenation
Year• Total B/W Marriages•••New B/W Marriages••• Percent Increase of B/W Marriages
2000• 287,576••••••••••••••••74,576•••••••••••••••••••35.0%
1990• 213,000••••••••••••••••92,000•••••••••••••••••••76.0%
1980• 121,000••••••••••••••••56,000•••••••••••••••••••86.2%
1970• 65,000•••••••••••••••••14,000•••••••••••••••••••27.5%
1960• 51,000
Upon sober analysis of the statistics:
Since 1980 the rate of increase for 'Black'/'White' married couples is drastically slowing down. The MSNBC article was merely propaganda to dismiss this fact. This data may actually be showing that America may have reached the saturation point of assimilation theorist agitprop. Reality is catching up to these elitists.
It would almost seem that behind the scenes, elitists may be a bit alarmed that their media induced micro-phenominon is slowing down. Despite the tons of propaganda $$$'s they invest to condition the planet to believe that 'Black'/'White' marriage is "flourishing", it is not.
Statistics Sources:
US Census 2000 Marriage data
http://www.census.gov/population/cen2000/phc-t19/tab01.pdf
US Census 1960-1990 - Historical Marriage Data
http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/ms-la/tabms-3.txt
In the real world we have all probably noticed 'interracial' couples before. Most probably never thought much of it and only noticed because it's unusual, but that was it. People are people. Most just go with the flow, some do not. That is just the way life is. Besides, if you know the FACTS, the rare miscegenated couple is not neccesarily all that bad of a thing. But then we need to notice something else...
Please note that this volume is not meant to demonize any person for whom they choose to marry. Far from it.
If you are one who is in a 'interracial' marriage, I wish you the best. There remains a distinct possibility that you may find this information to not be to your liking. It will depend on just how objective you are.
This is meant as a rational discussion of the rare phenominon of 'interracial' marriage and how elitists manipulate perceptions of it to their own insane ends.
Am I implying a superiority of one 'race' over another? No I am not, I am stating that different 'races' are just that, DIFFERENT.
Am I opposed to 'interracial' marriage in and of itself? No.
• I am opposed to the elitists lies that are being used to glorify a type of marriage that statistically does not have the same stability as same 'race' marriages.
• I am opposed to the elitist media attempting to direct reality, as opposed to their natural role of reflecting it.
• I am opposed to elitism, every single one of its commandments only brings misery to the masses.
Despite the speciousness of their arguments, marxist elitists are guilty of being the worst of all mass-murderers in modern history. One must ALWAYS thoroughly examine any aganda of an elitist, for they truly wishes to enslave or murder us all.
So what do the elitists not want us to know?
Observe this agitprop published by MSNBC:
Interracial marriage flourishes in U.S. - Race & ethnicity- msnbc.com
After 40 years, interracial marriage flourishing
{Take note that they depict a black male/white female couple in the headline photo}
...The boundaries were still distinct in 1967, a year when the Sidney Poitier film “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner” — a comedy built around parents’ acceptance of an interracial couple — was considered groundbreaking. The Supreme Court ruled that Virginia could not criminalize the marriage that Richard Loving, a white, and his black wife, Mildred, entered into nine years earlier in Washington, D.C. But what once seemed so radical to many Americans is now commonplace...
Black/White marriages are only 0.53% of all marriages, which has only increased from 0.13% since 1960.
~ That means 'Black'/'White' inter-marriage has gone from "radical" to "commonplace"?

United States 'Black'/'White' Miscegenation Increase
Year••Total Marriages•••Black/White Marriages••••Black/White percent of all Marriages
2000••54,493,232•••••••287,576••••••••••••••••••0.53%
1960••40,491,000•••••••51,000••••••••••••••••••••0.13%
Obviously, 'Black'/'White' miscegenation really is not that common, and it never will be. It is only commonplace in the elitist media. MSNBC is being true to their elitist form, they are perpetuating the illusion that 'Black'/'White' miscegenation is "commonplace".
Lets dissect what MSNBC published:
• They depict a 'Black' male /'White' female in the introduction photo, setting the tone for the article.
• Then they exclusively use 'Black'/'White' relationship anecdotes to fill out the story.
• Then they cite one of many, many propaganda films featuring a 'Black'/'White' couple.
• Then they cite statistics that were drawn on estimates for all inter-ethnic marriages, not just 'Black'/'White'.
They publish this to create the impression that the statistical analysis they are citing are primarily reflecting 'Black'/'White' marriages, which it does not. While they are correct in asserting that the rate of inter-ethnic marriages are on the rise, they are not disclosing the statistics of 'Black'/'White' inter-marriage, which is showing a definate decline.
Why does MSNBC and other assimilation theorists want people to believe that 'Black'/'White' miscegenation is "commonplace" when it is only 0.53% of all marriages? Why does MSNBC want people to believe that 'Black'/'White' intermarriage is 'flourishing' when the rate of new 'Black'/'White' marriages is drastically declining?
US Historical Increase in 'Black'/'White' Miscegenation
Year• Total B/W Marriages•••New B/W Marriages••• Percent Increase of B/W Marriages
2000• 287,576••••••••••••••••74,576•••••••••••••••••••35.0%
1990• 213,000••••••••••••••••92,000•••••••••••••••••••76.0%
1980• 121,000••••••••••••••••56,000•••••••••••••••••••86.2%
1970• 65,000•••••••••••••••••14,000•••••••••••••••••••27.5%
1960• 51,000
Upon sober analysis of the statistics:
Since 1980 the rate of increase for 'Black'/'White' married couples is drastically slowing down. The MSNBC article was merely propaganda to dismiss this fact. This data may actually be showing that America may have reached the saturation point of assimilation theorist agitprop. Reality is catching up to these elitists.
It would almost seem that behind the scenes, elitists may be a bit alarmed that their media induced micro-phenominon is slowing down. Despite the tons of propaganda $$$'s they invest to condition the planet to believe that 'Black'/'White' marriage is "flourishing", it is not.
Statistics Sources:
US Census 2000 Marriage data
http://www.census.gov/population/cen2000/phc-t19/tab01.pdf
US Census 1960-1990 - Historical Marriage Data
http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/ms-la/tabms-3.txt