Newspaper and magazine circulation continues to decline sharply, as does viewership for cable news.
Shit like this causes me to dismiss this "source" as drivel, obviously the rise of the internet and the ease of consuming content online is a big factor in newspaper, magazine, and cable news. Only someone with an agenda would purposely ignore the obvious and try to look at reduction in magazine subscriptions in a vacuum to lay out evidence of less intellectual thinking.
The three big network supper-hour shows drew a combined average audience of 22.6 million in 2013, down from 52 million in 1980. While 82 per cent of Americans now say they seek out news digitally, the quality of the information theyÂ’re getting is suspect.
And how exactly does author quantify "suspect" for internet content compared to what was on supper hour shows in 1980? I submit the availability of content from different sources and different motivations is far superior to 1980 when you pretty much had to pick your major TV network to get your information, very little choice and definitely not much on TV that wasn't produced from a large corporation.
What is America reading? 50 shades of grey.
Actually the best selling book of 2013 was Inferno by Dan Brown, the 4th in his series which included Angels & Demons, The Da Vinci Code and The Lost Symbol. Fiction yes but hardly fluff and having a lot more historical depth than most fiction novels.
1980's best seller list included Fire Starter and Princess Daisy, have we really devolved so much?
I have a friend who is a 93 yr old published author. His writing is superb and yet his books didn't become a best seller. Why? His writing is so eloquent and detailed it requires the reader to "think".
Logical fallacy, you can hardly prove the reason his books didn't sell is because it requires the reader to think there are so many factors in whether a book is a best seller and your personal opinion of it is hardly weight enough to demonstrate it should be a best seller.