Well if there were video systems on McCain's life which this reporter was discussing and NOT the accident maybe I'd agree with you.
The video systems I'm sure report what you are advocating.
But is the events after that the reporter of the above article is discussing is the issue regarding McCain's moral turpitude. Maybe this quote sums up McCain's military career:
McCain confided to Larson that he might have to get out of the Navy because, in the words of the Timberg biography, “his past had become a burden” and “whenever he joined a new outfit he was dismayed that his reputation for mayhem had preceded him.
McCain was as his first wife said... "John McCain didn’t want to be 40, he wanted to be 25."
I personally don't care about his personal life. I do mind when people lie about the Forrestal fire.
And I mind when treasonous Donald lies about his relationship with Russia.
See how that works.
And, no I don’t care who he bonks IF it is consensual which not al of the orange loon’s liaisons appear to have been.
So PROVE to me that Trump ASKED personally as Obama did ON an open microphone.
I understand your message about space,” replied Medvedev, who will hand over the presidency to Putin in May.
“
This is my last election … After my election I have more flexibility,” Obama said, expressing confidence that he would win a second term.
“
I will transmit this information to Vladimir,” said Medvedev, Putin’s protégé and long considered number two in Moscow’s power structure.
Also... how is it you are SO knowledgeable about Trump's sexual affairs to make the really rash assumption that "not al(sic) of the liaisons appear consensual"?
Are you:
A) a God and KNOW everything or
B) a peeping Tom
C) Or a personal confidante with ALL of the affairs that Trump has had?
Just WHERE do you come off making that statement?
What politician
anywhere in
any country in
any time, DID NOT have more flexibility after his election?
What the **** is WRONG with you?
Hey nothing is wrong if it is OK for Obama to ask for Putin to not do anything till Obama's re-election and if Trump's campaign (not Trump unlike Obama) ask Russia if they
can help get Trump elected by providing any stuff on Hillary.
What is the difference?
Obama is seeking re-election. Trump is seeking election.
Well no difference there except Trump being investigated... Obama NOT.
Differences?
Obama (
OBAMA ASKED...not an aide..OBAMA asked)Russia "hey give me some flexibility i.e. don't do anything till after my re-election."
Trump's campaign( not Trump by the way big difference)... contacted by Russians
(again big difference here THEY contacted the campaign) they have some dirt on Hillary.
So while there are some similarities there are some differences.
Both people are involved in elections and Obama asked for help, Russians offered help to Trump campaign...(not Trump directly...)
Differences... OBAMA ASKED for help... Obama personally !
Trump's campaign..(NOT TRUMP) was asked...(they didn't seek it the Russians offered) if they wanted to take a meeting regarding Hillary.
Of course it is in the eye of the beholder... You consider Obama a god. Sinless. Can do no wrong.
Me? I don't like Trump personally. I think he is a loud mouth. Obnoxious. A braggart. BUT Trump gets things done and from my expert point of view having
watched/tracked the MSM's biased news presentations.... I'd prefer Trump's tweets as a basis of truth over the MSM...most recently Lannie Davis recanting he didn't know!
Yet the CNN in tracking the story continues the "anonymous source" explanation. Sorry but that's getting too old.