Am I missing something with these revised job numbers?

[AirTight]

Is there another time when the job numbers were revised and ended up being as low as what came out this pass friday? To go from 146,000 jobs in June to 14,000 is concerning. I've normally seen it be revised 10 to 20,000 less, but not over 100,000 less. If Im right, someone needed to lose their job over that.

 

[Cassandro]

Is there another time when the job numbers were revised and ended up being as low as what came out this pass friday? To go from 146,000 jobs in June to 14,000 is concerning. I've normally seen it be revised 10 to 20,000 less, but not over 100,000 less. If Im right, someone needed to lose their job over that.

She did (Biden appointee).

 

[Crepitus]

Is there another time when the job numbers were revised and ended up being as low as what came out this pass friday? To go from 146,000 jobs in June to 14,000 is concerning. I've normally seen it be revised 10 to 20,000 less, but not over 100,000 less. If Im right, someone needed to lose their job over that.

Yeah, the orange squatter in the white house.

 

[MarathonMike]

Is there another time when the job numbers were revised and ended up being as low as what came out this pass friday? To go from 146,000 jobs in June to 14,000 is concerning. I've normally seen it be revised 10 to 20,000 less, but not over 100,000 less. If Im right, someone needed to lose their job over that.

You are right, and the problem isn't just the latest jobs numbers. They've been sucking ever since Biden appointed that Democrat ditz to run the BLS.

 

[cnm]

Yeah, the orange squatter in the white house.

Losing over 100,000 is pretty careless.

 

[cnm]

You are right, and the problem isn't just the latest jobs numbers. They've been sucking ever since Biden appointed that Democrat ditz to run the BLS.

That's the sort of frank sheeting home of the blame the US needs right now.

 

[Crepitus]

Losing over 100,000 is pretty careless.

Last time he was here he lost over 3 million.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

She did (Biden appointee).

Dipshit, this same lady reported a gain of only 12,000 jobs right before the Nov 2024 election. She didn't lie then and she is not lying now.

She is honest....Trump and you MAGA ***** should try it some day.

 

[Billiejeens]

Losing over 100,000 is pretty careless.

Also false, retard.

 

[Billiejeens]

Dipshit, this same lady reported a gain of only 12,000 jobs right before the Nov 2024 election. She didn't lie then and she is not lying now.

She is honest....Trump and you MAGA ***** should try it some day.

False
Damn you stupid

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

False
Damn you stupid

Little MAGA Nazi piece of shit....making up his own reality again.

Reported on 4 Nov 2024...right before the Nov 5 election. --

October 2024 Jobs Report: Only 12,000 Jobs Added, Tempered By Weather and Strike Related Disruptions | J.P. Morgan

U.S. job growth grew by the slowest pace since 2020. Our strategists believe this softer report will keep the Fed on its programmatic rate-cutting cycle.

www.jpmorgan.com

 

[Dante]

Am I missing something with these revised job numbers?​

Have you asked this on any other month in any other year?​

 

[g5000]

Is there another time when the job numbers were revised and ended up being as low as what came out this pass friday?

Yes.

A downward revision in 2009 was the worst ever.

.

 

[Lesh]

Is there another time when the job numbers were revised and ended up being as low as what came out this pass friday? To go from 146,000 jobs in June to 14,000 is concerning. I've normally seen it be revised 10 to 20,000 less, but not over 100,000 less. If Im right, someone needed to lose their job over that.

Job numbers get revised routinely

Don’t let your ignorance rule you

 

[g5000]

Dipshit, this same lady reported a gain of only 12,000 jobs right before the Nov 2024 election. She didn't lie then and she is not lying now.

She is honest....Trump and you MAGA ***** should try it some day.

That's a fact.

Employment Situation News Release - 2024 M10 Results

www.bls.gov

Only 12,000 jobs reported for October, just before the election.

 

[g5000]

False
Damn you stupid

And all the tards say, "NUH-UH!"

Look for yourself, dipshit:

Employment Situation News Release - 2024 M10 Results

www.bls.gov

Total nonfarm payroll employment was essentially unchanged in October (+12,000), and the unemployment rate was unchanged at 4.1 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today.

 

[g5000]

Is there another time when the job numbers were revised and ended up being as low as what came out this pass friday? To go from 146,000 jobs in June to 14,000 is concerning. I've normally seen it be revised 10 to 20,000 less, but not over 100,000 less. If Im right, someone needed to lose their job over that.

Technical Notes for the CES-National Benchmark

www.bls.gov

Take a look at 2009.

Largest downward revision...EVAH!


Trump is a big, fat, orange titty baby, He can't take a hit. He whines like a ***** and lashes out, blaming anyone but himself.

.

 

[g5000]

Hitler Receives A Bad Jobs Report

Adolf Hitler is informed by his staff of a bad July jobs report.

www.captiongenerator.com

 

[wamose]

Is there another time when the job numbers were revised and ended up being as low as what came out this pass friday? To go from 146,000 jobs in June to 14,000 is concerning. I've normally seen it be revised 10 to 20,000 less, but not over 100,000 less. If Im right, someone needed to lose their job over that.

Maybe that job could be done better by AI and we could save a lot of money in the process.

 

[OKTexas]

Is there another time when the job numbers were revised and ended up being as low as what came out this pass friday? To go from 146,000 jobs in June to 14,000 is concerning. I've normally seen it be revised 10 to 20,000 less, but not over 100,000 less. If Im right, someone needed to lose their job over that.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/jobs-data-revisions-that-cost-us-government-statistician-her-job-2025-08-04

.