Sixties Fan
Diamond Member
- Mar 6, 2017
- 68,750
- 12,338
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #1,901
Letās ignore the fact that this particular lack is irrelevant to Rantisiās woes, since a hospital Azaizeh described as lacking enough power to keep its lights on certainly doesnāt have enough to run its air conditioners, with or without parts. The key sentence is the clever segue between the paragraph about the lack of medical equipment and the one about the lack of air conditioning: Not only is medical equipment lacking, but āEven transferring equipment from Israel that was bought in advance especially for Rantisi is a challenge.ā
Thus without actually saying so, Azaizeh managed to imply that the shortage of medical equipment also stems from Israeli restrictions. And from there, itās an easy step to concluding that the unspecified āpolitical conflictā behind the power crisis must also involve Israel. In reality, of course, Israel has never interfered with shipments of either fuel or medicine to Gaza, though it has barred dual-use items that arenāt humanitarian necessities.
A human-rights organization that actually cared about Gazaās humanitarian crisis would name and shame the responsible partiesāFatah and Hamasāin an effort to pressure them to compromise, or at least make clear that the crisis stems from nonpayment and urge international donors to cover the shortfall. Yet Azaizehās op-ed makes no effort to address the causes of the crisis; its sole purpose is to smear Israel.
Nor is Gisha a negligible organization. Granted, itās not a household name in America, but its reports are regularly quoted by the U.S. State Department, the European Union, the UN, and international rights organizations like Amnesty and HRW. Indeed, Europe considers it so valuable that European governments provide over half its funding; the UN and the New Israel Fund also chip in.
None of these self-appointed guardians of human rights are troubled by the fact that Gishaās main interest is hurting Israel rather than helping Palestinians, since their interest is the same. Thatās why HRW cares more about shutting down Israeli soccer teams in the settlements than it does about providing Gaza with reliable power, why Europe lavishes funding on organizations like Gisha, and why even the State Departmentās human-rights bureau (not to be confused with the rest of the U.S. government) devoted more space in its annual report to Israeli ārights violationsā(most of them either trivial matters or unsubstantiated slurs) than to the ongoing slaughters in places like Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Libya. Thatās also why such organizations are becoming increasingly āisolatedā in Israel, as the NIFās president complained this week.
(full article online)
Love of the Land: The Real Humanitarian Travesty in Gaza - by Evelyn Gordon
Thus without actually saying so, Azaizeh managed to imply that the shortage of medical equipment also stems from Israeli restrictions. And from there, itās an easy step to concluding that the unspecified āpolitical conflictā behind the power crisis must also involve Israel. In reality, of course, Israel has never interfered with shipments of either fuel or medicine to Gaza, though it has barred dual-use items that arenāt humanitarian necessities.
A human-rights organization that actually cared about Gazaās humanitarian crisis would name and shame the responsible partiesāFatah and Hamasāin an effort to pressure them to compromise, or at least make clear that the crisis stems from nonpayment and urge international donors to cover the shortfall. Yet Azaizehās op-ed makes no effort to address the causes of the crisis; its sole purpose is to smear Israel.
Nor is Gisha a negligible organization. Granted, itās not a household name in America, but its reports are regularly quoted by the U.S. State Department, the European Union, the UN, and international rights organizations like Amnesty and HRW. Indeed, Europe considers it so valuable that European governments provide over half its funding; the UN and the New Israel Fund also chip in.
None of these self-appointed guardians of human rights are troubled by the fact that Gishaās main interest is hurting Israel rather than helping Palestinians, since their interest is the same. Thatās why HRW cares more about shutting down Israeli soccer teams in the settlements than it does about providing Gaza with reliable power, why Europe lavishes funding on organizations like Gisha, and why even the State Departmentās human-rights bureau (not to be confused with the rest of the U.S. government) devoted more space in its annual report to Israeli ārights violationsā(most of them either trivial matters or unsubstantiated slurs) than to the ongoing slaughters in places like Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Libya. Thatās also why such organizations are becoming increasingly āisolatedā in Israel, as the NIFās president complained this week.
(full article online)
Love of the Land: The Real Humanitarian Travesty in Gaza - by Evelyn Gordon
