Thank you - 'circumstantial'...as in NO DIRECT< SMOKING-GUN, HARD, SOLID EVIDENCE. All snowflakes have is accusation and Conspiracy Theory BS!
Again, Hacking DNC e-mails is NOT 'hacking the election'. Such an act is not even LOOSELY related to 'hacking the election'. Hacking the DNC's e-mails is a spate event that happened during an election that cast a bad light on Democrats!
It's B U L L S H I T!
So? Circumstantial is still evidence and can still be quite convincing, especially when paired with DIRECT EVIDENCE OF TRUMP'S ADMIN LYING about it.
What exactly is that circumstantial evidence?
Starskey, can you answer the question?
Certainly. I need to ask though, why can't you?
There are multiple Trump people meeting multiple times with Russian officials at critical times within the timeline of the hacking, some with prior knowledge of information that was to be released.
Follow that with the fact that all of them, including Trump, have claimed no knowledge of meetings during the campaign.
That has been shown to be false and is certainly grounds for further investigation.