How many American and Japanese lives would have been lost with a full-scale invasion of Honshu?
Presently, America has no better allies in the Far East than Japan.
That is exactly how terrorist think where they believe killing innocent peoples are ok.
There is no justification to kill innocent peoples or even harm them.
It was WWII, Japan attacked us, if we had invaded mainland Japan the casualties would have been much much higher, on both sides
In war or not, there is no justification to kill innocent peoples, only terrorist kill them.
What Japanese did to pearl harbour is correct because it is a military base while what american did is very wrong because Hiroshima and Anagasaki is civilians cities.
It's called collateral damage, in every war that has ever happened it has taken place. It's part of war[/QUOTE
The civilians died in pearl harbour are unintentional, the point is Japan is attacking a military base, there are civilians died there or not is their own fault for being there during the attack. But in Horishima and Nagasaki are civilians cities and not military base so of course those who will died when those 2 cities got attacked will be civilians. It is like that colletoral damage stuff you mentioned for pearl harbour and not for Horishima and Nagasaki.
As for what happen in Nanking, know that Chinese are not american while Chinese never ask american to nuke and rape Japanese, also not many Japanese this days who become as wannabe Chinese so you miss the point of this topic.
It seems you care so much about what Japanese think about american, are you a weeb too? If not then you probably support weebs or maybe another american who can't live without Japanese.
