Adobe CS5 Master Collection...

[Dante]

It came in the mail today.

​

 

[Dante]

cool. I have a new play toy. USMB will get much quieter---and lamer.

 

[antagon]

go inkscape!!

 

[Douger]

Yeah. I already "stole" it.
Learn to use the Gimp.

 

[blu]

we just ordered it at work

 

[Dante]

Yeah. I already "stole" it.
Learn to use the Gimp.

I don't steal software. I never download 'free' music or stolen software. I'm better than you are and I am an evangelist trying to educate dealers, vendors, owner/operators and others to ask to see legitimate licenses for software from people they hire.

If a potential hire is to be trusted with private data and access, they should be above board in all things relating to software and more...

sorry, but I think you are what's wrong with the world. you suck. you're a thief.

 

[blu]

Yeah. I already "stole" it.
Learn to use the Gimp.

I don't steal software. I never download 'free' music or stolen software. I'm better than you are and I am an evangelist trying to educate dealers, vendors, owner/operators and others to ask to see legitimate licenses for software from people they hire.

If a potential hire is to be trusted with private data and access, they should be above board in all things relating to software and more...

sorry, but I think you are what's wrong with the world. you suck. you're a thief.

for software I havent used I have pirated before buying to make sure its worthwile. I don't play computer games much anymore but when I did I also used to pirate them before buying, since purchasing is $40-60 and there is no mechanism to rent or return computer games. thats too much money just for a game to suck

 

[RadiomanATL]

Yeah. I already "stole" it.
Learn to use the Gimp.

I don't steal software. I never download 'free' music or stolen software. I'm better than you are and I am an evangelist trying to educate dealers, vendors, owner/operators and others to ask to see legitimate licenses for software from people they hire.

If a potential hire is to be trusted with private data and access, they should be above board in all things relating to software and more...

sorry, but I think you are what's wrong with the world. you suck. you're a thief.

Gimp is a free shareware program. No stealing required.

 

[Dante]

Yeah. I already "stole" it.
Learn to use the Gimp.

I don't steal software. I never download 'free' music or stolen software. I'm better than you are and I am an evangelist trying to educate dealers, vendors, owner/operators and others to ask to see legitimate licenses for software from people they hire.

If a potential hire is to be trusted with private data and access, they should be above board in all things relating to software and more...

sorry, but I think you are what's wrong with the world. you suck. you're a thief.

Gimp is a free shareware program. No stealing required.

I know. Gimp is ok. But the poster said they stole the adobe software

 

[RadiomanATL]

I don't steal software. I never download 'free' music or stolen software. I'm better than you are and I am an evangelist trying to educate dealers, vendors, owner/operators and others to ask to see legitimate licenses for software from people they hire.

If a potential hire is to be trusted with private data and access, they should be above board in all things relating to software and more...

sorry, but I think you are what's wrong with the world. you suck. you're a thief.

Gimp is a free shareware program. No stealing required.

I know. Gimp is ok. But the poster said they stole the adobe software

OK. Carry on then.

 

[Dante]

Gimp is a free shareware program. No stealing required.

I know. Gimp is ok. But the poster said they stole the adobe software

OK. Carry on then.

I always do.

GIMP is not even in the same category as ADOBE proprietary software. I wish it were, but it's not.

 

[RadiomanATL]

I know. Gimp is ok. But the poster said they stole the adobe software

OK. Carry on then.

I always do.

GIMP is not even in the same category as ADOBE proprietary software. I wish it were, but it's not.

I agree.

But since I do not need to use photo manipulation software in a professional capacity, GIMP is all I need. I can't see shelling out the bucks for photoshop when all I use it for is goofing around occasionally.

 

[gslack]

Adobe = Bloatware.....

And if its just for a hobby or for playing with? Extreme overkill....

I got Adobe CS3 a couple years ago. Had to for some ignorant idea they had at work. Anyway, the install took over two hours on a AMD 4400+x2 with 2 gigs of ram running a SATA 2.0 hardrive.... That is just ridiculous. And then when I worked with it, I was shocked... Starting the programs took a ridiculous amount of time, the constant updates were an annoyance, the registration/security was overly done and failed to actually be secure... needless to say the fad came and went...

I recommend to anyone out there to use the various GNU software out there whenever you can before using Adobe and other bloated and overpriced software like it.

 

[Dante]

OK. Carry on then.

I always do.

GIMP is not even in the same category as ADOBE proprietary software. I wish it were, but it's not.

I agree.

But since I do not need to use photo manipulation software in a professional capacity, GIMP is all I need. I can't see shelling out the bucks for photoshop when all I use it for is goofing around occasionally.

I can't imagine anyone would say you should.

 

[Dante]

Adobe = Bloatware.....

And if its just for a hobby or for playing with? Extreme overkill....

I got Adobe CS3 a couple years ago. Had to for some ignorant idea they had at work. Anyway, the install took over two hours on a AMD 4400+x2 with 2 gigs of ram running a SATA 2.0 hardrive.... That is just ridiculous. And then when I worked with it, I was shocked... Starting the programs took a ridiculous amount of time, the constant updates were an annoyance, the registration/security was overly done and failed to actually be secure... needless to say the fad came and went...

I recommend to anyone out there to use the various GNU software out there whenever you can before using Adobe and other bloated and overpriced software like it.

It depends on what one wants to do. ADOBE software is only a tool. In some cases it is the best tool.

Why would anyone complain about using a tool they needed to do a job? In many cases there is no free or GNU software that can do the job.

 

[gslack]

Adobe = Bloatware.....

And if its just for a hobby or for playing with? Extreme overkill....

I got Adobe CS3 a couple years ago. Had to for some ignorant idea they had at work. Anyway, the install took over two hours on a AMD 4400+x2 with 2 gigs of ram running a SATA 2.0 hardrive.... That is just ridiculous. And then when I worked with it, I was shocked... Starting the programs took a ridiculous amount of time, the constant updates were an annoyance, the registration/security was overly done and failed to actually be secure... needless to say the fad came and went...

I recommend to anyone out there to use the various GNU software out there whenever you can before using Adobe and other bloated and overpriced software like it.

It depends on what one wants to do. ADOBE software is only a tool. In some cases it is the best tool.

Why would anyone complain about using a tool they needed to do a job? In many cases there is no free or GNU software that can do the job.

We didn't "need" it. One of our "techs" gets a fat check for a multi-user account referral... He sold our Dept head on it for graph and chart/graphic work and publishing... Our new graphics dept wanted it so we were pressed into adopting it for a time... We no longer retain a graphics dept, so the bloatware went with them. Now we get our graphics done elsewhere.

I used adobe 5 years ago and it was much faster even then than now. it is bloatware and that is all too clear. it is built on the premise of consumption. THey bring out a new version every year just to push the buyer to upgrade. Often the features are not worth the trouble, and the tax on system resources forces the end user to upgrade their system to run it. Its a cycle of excess that feeds itself until it becomes a bloated piece of software full of unneeded and often unwanted bells and whistles.

Seriously how often do you use all of its features? And when you add in the money made in support books, plug-ins, training books, and all the rest its all too clear it is more about selling you crap than being functional.

Anyway thats my opinion of it and any similar software like it. Take it or leave it.. use it of you want to, pay the price tag every year or so. But realize, that when they do the modeling, rendering, and compiling of all those great pixar films, they use RISC systems and you will not find windows on them. 90% or better run Sun, Unix, or linux. Also the web is powered by linux.... Gotta be a reason for that especially given the effort and money microsoft spends to change it....

 

[antagon]

i tolerate this type of development when it comes to NCAA football video games. when it comes to word processing, i would never use word to do all of the publishing bullshit they've half-ass added to office since 2003. but it is still there, still cumbersome. autoCAD has gone off the deep end, too, unless you're trying to model scenes for 3d movies. i make the same plans and elevations that i made in 2k, but there's something about new software that makes me bite. macromedia's gear has suffered gslack's bloat under adobe's dev regime, although i admit flash's enhancements are cool.

it is the consumer thing. i'm of that generation who anticipates what XXXXX2011 will be like when i'm installing v2010. i dont photoshop too much, but drawing-wise having lost my CS2 (or 3?) a couple years back, i've got the hang of free inkscape, and not felt the need to splurge on another adobe suite.

 

[Dante]

Adobe = Bloatware.....

And if its just for a hobby or for playing with? Extreme overkill....

I got Adobe CS3 a couple years ago. Had to for some ignorant idea they had at work. Anyway, the install took over two hours on a AMD 4400+x2 with 2 gigs of ram running a SATA 2.0 hardrive.... That is just ridiculous. And then when I worked with it, I was shocked... Starting the programs took a ridiculous amount of time, the constant updates were an annoyance, the registration/security was overly done and failed to actually be secure... needless to say the fad came and went...

I recommend to anyone out there to use the various GNU software out there whenever you can before using Adobe and other bloated and overpriced software like it.

It depends on what one wants to do. ADOBE software is only a tool. In some cases it is the best tool.

Why would anyone complain about using a tool they needed to do a job? In many cases there is no free or GNU software that can do the job.

We didn't "need" it. One of our "techs" gets a fat check for a multi-user account referral... He sold our Dept head on it for graph and chart/graphic work and publishing... Our new graphics dept wanted it so we were pressed into adopting it for a time... We no longer retain a graphics dept, so the bloatware went with them. Now we get our graphics done elsewhere.

I used adobe 5 years ago and it was much faster even then than now. it is bloatware and that is all too clear. it is built on the premise of consumption. THey bring out a new version every year just to push the buyer to upgrade. Often the features are not worth the trouble, and the tax on system resources forces the end user to upgrade their system to run it. Its a cycle of excess that feeds itself until it becomes a bloated piece of software full of unneeded and often unwanted bells and whistles.

Seriously how often do you use all of its features? And when you add in the money made in support books, plug-ins, training books, and all the rest its all too clear it is more about selling you crap than being functional.

Anyway thats my opinion of it and any similar software like it. Take it or leave it.. use it of you want to, pay the price tag every year or so. But realize, that when they do the modeling, rendering, and compiling of all those great pixar films, they use RISC systems and you will not find windows on them. 90% or better run Sun, Unix, or linux. Also the web is powered by linux.... Gotta be a reason for that especially given the effort and money microsoft spends to change it....

Most all your points I can agree with, in certain context. But you are wrong using past experiences as an argument against CS5.

I started out with MACROMEDIA in 2004, because there was nothing that came close to it. I had a developer's license for MX8 with FLASH Pro. I had just gotten my very first computer and broadband modem. I waited for speed in modems and broadband.

I tried learning things about SVG files and stuff that no browser supported. I tried learning lots of stuff (I wanted to learn the internet LOL). MACROMEDIA products allowed me to learn much more than I would have without them.

I did learn on my own, how to read codes, and hand code, and trouble shoot language scripts that I was not great at writing in or fully understanding. I did use MACROMEDIA products to enhance and build on my small understanding of things.

MACROMEDIA is now part of ADOBE. I use their products same way---as a tool for learning and experience, and creativity and more...

It is not slower to load on the latest computers as the ram is so much bigger. The processors are so much more powerful. I never upgraded for bells and whistles. In short, I was never an easy mark for marketing. Sounds like you were at some point.

 

[Dante]

i tolerate this type of development when it comes to NCAA football video games. when it comes to word processing, i would never use word to do all of the publishing bullshit they've half-ass added to office since 2003. but it is still there, still cumbersome. autoCAD has gone off the deep end, too, unless you're trying to model scenes for 3d movies. i make the same plans and elevations that i made in 2k, but there's something about new software that makes me bite. macromedia's gear has suffered gslack's bloat under adobe's dev regime, although i admit flash's enhancements are cool.

it is the consumer thing. i'm of that generation who anticipates what XXXXX2011 will be like when i'm installing v2010. i dont photoshop too much, but drawing-wise having lost my CS2 (or 3?) a couple years back, i've got the hang of free inkscape, and not felt the need to splurge on another adobe suite.

If you bought a license I do not know how you lost CS.

The bloat is there in all things. But my bloated ADOBE CS5 opens much quicker than my MACROMEDIA MX8 ever did. Granted I am using a newer computer.

 

[gslack]

It depends on what one wants to do. ADOBE software is only a tool. In some cases it is the best tool.

Why would anyone complain about using a tool they needed to do a job? In many cases there is no free or GNU software that can do the job.

We didn't "need" it. One of our "techs" gets a fat check for a multi-user account referral... He sold our Dept head on it for graph and chart/graphic work and publishing... Our new graphics dept wanted it so we were pressed into adopting it for a time... We no longer retain a graphics dept, so the bloatware went with them. Now we get our graphics done elsewhere.

I used adobe 5 years ago and it was much faster even then than now. it is bloatware and that is all too clear. it is built on the premise of consumption. THey bring out a new version every year just to push the buyer to upgrade. Often the features are not worth the trouble, and the tax on system resources forces the end user to upgrade their system to run it. Its a cycle of excess that feeds itself until it becomes a bloated piece of software full of unneeded and often unwanted bells and whistles.

Seriously how often do you use all of its features? And when you add in the money made in support books, plug-ins, training books, and all the rest its all too clear it is more about selling you crap than being functional.

Anyway thats my opinion of it and any similar software like it. Take it or leave it.. use it of you want to, pay the price tag every year or so. But realize, that when they do the modeling, rendering, and compiling of all those great pixar films, they use RISC systems and you will not find windows on them. 90% or better run Sun, Unix, or linux. Also the web is powered by linux.... Gotta be a reason for that especially given the effort and money microsoft spends to change it....

Most all your points I can agree with, in certain context. But you are wrong using past experiences as an argument against CS5.

I started out with MACROMEDIA in 2004, because there was nothing that came close to it. I had a developer's license for MX8 with FLASH Pro. I had just gotten my very first computer and broadband modem. I waited for speed in modems and broadband.

I tried learning things about SVG files and stuff that no browser supported. I tried learning lots of stuff (I wanted to learn the internet LOL). MACROMEDIA products allowed me to learn much more than I would have without them.

I did learn on my own, how to read codes, and hand code, and trouble shoot language scripts that I was not great at writing in or fully understanding. I did use MACROMEDIA products to enhance and build on my small understanding of things.

MACROMEDIA is now part of ADOBE. I use their products same way---as a tool for learning and experience, and creativity and more...

It is not slower to load on the latest computers as the ram is so much bigger. The processors are so much more powerful. I never upgraded for bells and whistles. In short, I was never an easy mark for marketing. Sounds like you were at some point.

Dante no offense but I am not sure you understood some of what I said there...

It was not MY choice to get CS3 it was a tech who convinced our superiors we would need it. The last Adobe software I owned personally was Photoshop back in 03' I believe. And it was given to me by my brother who thought I could use it as a supplement to my graphite and charcoal portraits. I used it somewhat, but it was a toy more than anything...

And one of the points I made about it being slower to load, is taking into account the demands on the system as well. As I said this pushes everyone to upgrade their systems just to run productivity software...

Anyway, I feel the "productivity" part in their software has been replaced by pomp and circumstance..... Either way glad you enjoy the software, and happy it helped you to learn...