ACLU Lawyer Can’t Answer When Justice Alito Asks Her to “Define man or woman, boy or girl” During Questioning on Transgenders In Sports Case

Hollie

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
72,059
Reaction score
29,994
Points
2,290
A spectacular failure for the tranny chasers as justice Alito questions an ACLU lawyer to define a man, boy, woman, or girl.

I will never understand the disgust that the left holds for women and girls.


At one point during their pro-trans boys in girls’ locker/bathrooms argument, the ACLU lawyer Kathleen Hartnett was asked by Justice Samuel Alito to define a man, boy, woman, or girl. Hartnett appeared to panic as she realized Alito had brilliantly set a trap for her. Unable to answer the question, Hartnett appears to panic, telling him “they” don’t have a definition.
 
At one point during their pro-trans boys in girls’ locker/bathrooms argument, the ACLU lawyer Kathleen Hartnett was asked by Justice Samuel Alito to define a man, boy, woman, or girl.

What is so hard about this question? Boys wear blue and girls wear pink. End of story.

Ok, you wanna get technical? OK. Boys play with guns and soldiers and go Bang Bang, while girls bake cookies in their Mattel Easy Bake Oven.

Hope that clears everything up for you.
 

As Expected, Justice Jackson Humiliated Herself During Today’s Oral Arguments

13 Jan 2026 ~~ By Matt Margolis

I don’t think anyone would confuse Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson with a sharp legal mind. She often comes across as the poster child for what’s wrong with DEI hires. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Little v. Hecox, a case that will likely decide whether laws barring biological males from competing on girls’ sports teams are constitutional. Given that Jackson famously admitted during her confirmation hearings that she didn’t know what a woman was — because, as she put it, she’s “not a biologist” — you knew she was bound to be a real spectacle. And true to form, she did not disappoint.
As you probably could have guessed, Jackson struggled through a series of nearly incomprehensible statements about sex, gender identity, and sports classifications. It was embarrassing.
~Snip~
It’s hilarious that Jackson stumbled over the pronunciation of one of the left’s favorite made-up words, all while failing to understand the difference between real girls and boys who pretend to be girls.

~Snip~
The argument was a dizzying tangle of “uhs” and qualifying phrases, leaving Idaho Solicitor General Alan Hurst unable to understand what she was even asking.
That makes all of us.

~Snip~

This woman is an embarrassment to the court.

Commentary:
Biden's contribution to the Supreme Court DEI-K.B. Jackson.
The most embarrassing SCOTUS justice ever... fitting that she’s the appointee of the most embarrassing, incompetent president ever.
She just doesn’t know how to define what a woman is.
1768373345172.webp
 
A spectacular failure for the tranny chasers as justice Alito questions an ACLU lawyer to define a man, boy, woman, or girl.

I will never understand the disgust that the left holds for women and girls.


At one point during their pro-trans boys in girls’ locker/bathrooms argument, the ACLU lawyer Kathleen Hartnett was asked by Justice Samuel Alito to define a man, boy, woman, or girl. Hartnett appeared to panic as she realized Alito had brilliantly set a trap for her. Unable to answer the question, Hartnett appears to panic, telling him “they” don’t have a definition.
Hell ... even one of the Supreme Court Justices has no clue what a woman is. The buffoon baboon should never have been installed on the Supreme Court:

 
This is such a waste of time

I will make it so easy even a Democrat can understand

If you are born with a dick you are not a chick

End if your Biology 101 class
 
Hell ... even one of the Supreme Court Justices has no clue what a woman is. The buffoon baboon should never have been installed on the Supreme Court:


This must be incredibly frustrating for the SC judges. Sitting on the highest court in the land and be subjected to morons who can’t even define the most basic terms of the arguments they bring.

Unprepared leftist losers who should turn in the diplomas they received from a correspondence course.
 
This must be incredibly frustrating for the SC judges. Sitting on the highest court in the land and be subjected to morons who can’t even define the most basic terms of the arguments they bring.

Unprepared leftist losers who should turn in the diplomas they received from a correspondence course.
And wasting their time listening to deranged liberals defending hiw failed male athletes havevthe right to beat the hell out of women
 
I thought liberals were supposed to be all about the science. I guess they are not so intent on following biological science.
 
A spectacular failure for the tranny chasers as justice Alito questions an ACLU lawyer to define a man, boy, woman, or girl.

I will never understand the disgust that the left holds for women and girls.


At one point during their pro-trans boys in girls’ locker/bathrooms argument, the ACLU lawyer Kathleen Hartnett was asked by Justice Samuel Alito to define a man, boy, woman, or girl. Hartnett appeared to panic as she realized Alito had brilliantly set a trap for her. Unable to answer the question, Hartnett appears to panic, telling him “they” don’t have a definition.


They may not have a definition, but sane people sure as hell do. It's very basic biology. Ya know, SCIENCE!

.
 
Webster's dictionary does have definitions:

man,
an individual human especially : an adult male human

boy,
  1. A male child.
  2. A son. "his youngest boy."
  3. A man, especially a young man.

woman,
An adult female human.


girl.
  1. A female child.
  2. A daughter. "our youngest girl."
  3. A woman.
 
Webster's dictionary does have definitions:

man,
an individual human especially : an adult male human

boy,
  1. A male child.
  2. A son. "his youngest boy."
  3. A man, especially a young man.

woman,
An adult female human.


girl.
  1. A female child.
  2. A daughter. "our youngest girl."
  3. A woman.
Even AI (bing) gets it right.

Can you fathom what would have happened if FJB had got a majority of clowns like Brown on the court?
 
More PJMedia white racist bullshit.
 
15th post
A spectacular failure for the tranny chasers as justice Alito questions an ACLU lawyer to define a man, boy, woman, or girl.

I will never understand the disgust that the left holds for women and girls.


At one point during their pro-trans boys in girls’ locker/bathrooms argument, the ACLU lawyer Kathleen Hartnett was asked by Justice Samuel Alito to define a man, boy, woman, or girl. Hartnett appeared to panic as she realized Alito had brilliantly set a trap for her. Unable to answer the question, Hartnett appears to panic, telling him “they” don’t have a definition.
The idiocy on the Left is very real. And very disturbing. And very dangerous.
 
Back
Top Bottom