A recap of "collusion" with the Russians......

[nat4900]

From the onset, let me RESTATE that in law, collusion in itself is not a criminal act.....BUT, it certainly is a serious breach of ethics on a national election when one side conspires with a hostile foreign government....an act that borders on a conspiracy to defraud the American voters and a vile act against our democratic institution.

Most posters on here are Trump cultists who are beyond any objective thought......but for those who can still think on their own, imagine..............just IMAGINE what the reaction would be if Obama had such a close relationship with a foreign government as Trump has jad and still has with the Kremlin.

With the above in mind, ask yourself the following questions:

Did Trump ASK for Russian assistance in defeating Clinton???..........Yes or No?

Did Trump RECEIVE Russian assistance in defeating Clinton???..........Yes or No?

Did Trump BENEFIT from Russian assistance in defeating Clinton???..........Yes or No?

Did Trump REWARD Russians for their assistance in defeating Clinton???..........Yes or No?

Again, let us remember that Trump ("Russia if you're listening....") did ask for Russian help.....and also remember the changing of the GOP platform to remove sanctions against Russia imposed by Obama........

Virtually ALL of our intelligence agencies have stated that Russia not only tried but DID interfere with our election and then ask yourself exactly WHAT Trump has done to demand that Russia stop such interference.

 

[Hossfly]

From the onset, let me RESTATE that in law, collusion in itself is not a criminal act.....BUT, it certainly is a serious breach of ethics on a national election when one side conspires with a hostile foreign government....an act that borders on a conspiracy to defraud the American voters and a vile act against our democratic institution.

Most posters on here are Trump cultists who are beyond any objective thought......but for those who can still think on their own, imagine..............just IMAGINE what the reaction would be if Obama had such a close relationship with a foreign government as Trump has jad and still has with the Kremlin.

With the above in mind, ask yourself the following questions:

Did Trump ASK for Russian assistance in defeating Clinton???..........Yes or No?

Did Trump RECEIVE Russian assistance in defeating Clinton???..........Yes or No?

Did Trump BENEFIT from Russian assistance in defeating Clinton???..........Yes or No?

Did Trump REWARD Russians for their assistance in defeating Clinton???..........Yes or No?

Again, let us remember that Trump ("Russia if you're listening....") did ask for Russian help.....and also remember the changing of the GOP platform to remove sanctions against Russia imposed by Obama........

Virtually ALL of our intelligence agencies have stated that Russia not only tried but DID interfere with our election and then ask yourself exactly WHAT Trump has done to demand that Russia stop such interference.

Are you on Mueller's investigative team? If not you need to get him your info so that he can edit his letter to the AG and put Trump & Company in jail, ASAP.

 

[Obama2020]

Believe it or not... I believe Mueller on the collusion part of the investigation. Putin is way too smart for the Beverly hillbilly dumb-ass Trump improvisation team... there's no way in hell you could collude these 2 totally mismatched entities.

As for obstruction... Bill Barr fixed it for Trump and Mitch will make sure no details go through until Trump clears the statutes of limitations.
... end of story.

 

[theHawk]

From the onset, let me RESTATE that in law, collusion in itself is not a criminal act.....BUT, it certainly is a serious breach of ethics on a national election when one side conspires with a hostile foreign government....an act that borders on a conspiracy to defraud the American voters and a vile act against our democratic institution.

Most posters on here are Trump cultists who are beyond any objective thought......but for those who can still think on their own, imagine..............just IMAGINE what the reaction would be if Obama had such a close relationship with a foreign government as Trump has jad and still has with the Kremlin.

With the above in mind, ask yourself the following questions:

Did Trump ASK for Russian assistance in defeating Clinton???..........Yes or No?

Did Trump RECEIVE Russian assistance in defeating Clinton???..........Yes or No?

Did Trump BENEFIT from Russian assistance in defeating Clinton???..........Yes or No?

Did Trump REWARD Russians for their assistance in defeating Clinton???..........Yes or No?

Again, let us remember that Trump ("Russia if you're listening....") did ask for Russian help.....and also remember the changing of the GOP platform to remove sanctions against Russia imposed by Obama........

Virtually ALL of our intelligence agencies have stated that Russia not only tried but DID interfere with our election and then ask yourself exactly WHAT Trump has done to demand that Russia stop such interference.

The Mueller report has zero evidence of any collusion. So leftwingers just manufacture their own “report” stating President Trump colluded with Russia.

Does it help you sleep better at night, Nat?

 

[theHawk]

By the way, here is the actual recap of the collusion narrative:

 

[Edgetho]

Nixon committed obstruction.

Trump did not.

A President has the right to fire an Executive Appointee any time for any reason; or for NO reason. It is within his Constitutionally proscribed power to do so and it is absolute. He can not, however, break the Law. He can not ask his subordinates to lie to an investigator. THAT is not within a President's purview. But he CAN fire an Executive Appointee any time for any reason whether he has a good reason or whether he has NO reason. It just doesn't matter.

For Trump to have committed obstruction, he would have had to command or even ask a subordinate to lie, obfuscate or otherwise dodge when being questioned.

Since mewler stated UNEQUIVOCABLY that there was no collusion, there was no way Trump could have committed obstruction.

You simply can't obstruct justice when there is no crime to obstruct. It is impossible.

It just can't happen.

And only SCUM of the Earth dimocrap FILTH are still pushing the lie.

It's just not going to change, people.

dimocraps are the lowest form of life on the Planet Earth. Always have been, always will be.

I wouldn't piss in one's face if his hair was on fire

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Gnat graces us with another masterpiece.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

From the onset, let me RESTATE that in law, collusion in itself is not a criminal act.....BUT, it certainly is a serious breach of ethics on a national election when one side conspires with a hostile foreign government....an act that borders on a conspiracy to defraud the American voters and a vile act against our democratic institution.

Most posters on here are Trump cultists who are beyond any objective thought......but for those who can still think on their own, imagine..............just IMAGINE what the reaction would be if Obama had such a close relationship with a foreign government as Trump has jad and still has with the Kremlin.

With the above in mind, ask yourself the following questions:

Did Trump ASK for Russian assistance in defeating Clinton???..........Yes or No?

Did Trump RECEIVE Russian assistance in defeating Clinton???..........Yes or No?

Did Trump BENEFIT from Russian assistance in defeating Clinton???..........Yes or No?

Did Trump REWARD Russians for their assistance in defeating Clinton???..........Yes or No?

Again, let us remember that Trump ("Russia if you're listening....") did ask for Russian help.....and also remember the changing of the GOP platform to remove sanctions against Russia imposed by Obama........

Virtually ALL of our intelligence agencies have stated that Russia not only tried but DID interfere with our election and then ask yourself exactly WHAT Trump has done to demand that Russia stop such interference.

Are you still mad that Reagan won the Cold War?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

A recap of "collusion" with the Russians

There was none....just like we told you assholes

 

[WTH_Progs?]

You're just too foolish OP.

A. Russia and other foreign countries have "interfered" with our elections for MANY MANY decades. You people are just too emotional "Russia attacked our democracy". Blah blah blah.

B. The only collusion we know of occurred between DEMOCRATS and Russia. More than that they fabricated a story and document to investigate Trump. That and a corrupt law enforcement is just the beginning how corrupt Obama's admin. was.

C. The "attack on our democracy" occurred on Obama's watch. You suggest Trump has done nothing to help prevent it, WTF did Obama do?

D. Trump has IN FACT acted on this. Difference between Obama and Trump is Trump gets shit done.

E. Did Trump benefit from Russia? Fuck no. You're just a snowflake and will never get over Trump's election. The rest of your message is just a rant as well.

 

[Hossfly]

Nixon committed obstruction.

Trump did not.

A President has the right to fire an Executive Appointee any time for any reason; or for NO reason. It is within his Constitutionally proscribed power to do so and it is absolute. He can not, however, break the Law. He can not ask his subordinates to lie to an investigator. THAT is not within a President's purview. But he CAN fire an Executive Appointee any time for any reason whether he has a good reason or whether he has NO reason. It just doesn't matter.

For Trump to have committed obstruction, he would have had to command or even ask a subordinate to lie, obfuscate or otherwise dodge when being questioned.

Since mewler stated UNEQUIVOCABLY that there was no collusion, there was no way Trump could have committed obstruction.

You simply can't obstruct justice when there is no crime to obstruct. It is impossible.

It just can't happen.

And only SCUM of the Earth dimocrap FILTH are still pushing the lie.

It's just not going to change, people.

dimocraps are the lowest form of life on the Planet Earth. Always have been, always will be.

I wouldn't piss in one's face if his hair was on fire

~~~~Gen. George S. Patton (USA)

“Politicians are the lowest form of life and liberal democrats are the lowest form of politicians.”

 

[nat4900]

Are you on Mueller's investigative team? If not you need to get him your info so that he can edit his letter to the AG and put Trump & Company in jail, ASAP.

First of all, Mueller didn't write a "letter" to the AG.........(did Hannity tell you a fib???).....But much more important, can you address the questions posed in the O/P???

Otherwise, it may be time for your nap.

 

[nat4900]

The Mueller report has zero evidence of any collusion. So leftwingers just manufacture their own “report” stating President Trump colluded with Russia.

WOW.....you are a fast reader of Mueller's report......Please share it with us since you must be so fucking lucky to have gotten a copy.......(what an idiot........lol)

BTW, if you cannot address the questions in the O/P it may be time for your kool-aid drink.

 

[nat4900]

There was none....just like we told you assholes

".........and Hannity will be right back after these short commercials...."...............LOL

 

[DJT for Life]

From the onset, let me RESTATE that in law, collusion in itself is not a criminal act.....BUT, it certainly is a serious breach of ethics on a national election when one side conspires with a hostile foreign government....an act that borders on a conspiracy to defraud the American voters and a vile act against our democratic institution.

Most posters on here are Trump cultists who are beyond any objective thought......but for those who can still think on their own, imagine..............just IMAGINE what the reaction would be if Obama had such a close relationship with a foreign government as Trump has jad and still has with the Kremlin.

With the above in mind, ask yourself the following questions:

Did Trump ASK for Russian assistance in defeating Clinton???..........Yes or No?

Did Trump RECEIVE Russian assistance in defeating Clinton???..........Yes or No?

Did Trump BENEFIT from Russian assistance in defeating Clinton???..........Yes or No?

Did Trump REWARD Russians for their assistance in defeating Clinton???..........Yes or No?

Again, let us remember that Trump ("Russia if you're listening....") did ask for Russian help.....and also remember the changing of the GOP platform to remove sanctions against Russia imposed by Obama........

Virtually ALL of our intelligence agencies have stated that Russia not only tried but DID interfere with our election and then ask yourself exactly WHAT Trump has done to demand that Russia stop such interference.

Here's a shortened version of your recap of Collusion with the Russians.

"There was none!"

 

[EvilCat Breath]

17 investigators. 40 attorneys. 500 witnesses. 2800 subpoenas. No collusion. Yet a poster on USMB has figured it all out.

Yeah Riiiiiiiight.

 

[nat4900]

17 investigators. 40 attorneys. 500 witnesses. 2800 subpoenas. No collusion. Yet a poster on USMB has figured it all out.

Answer the fucking questions in the O/P.......and since you CANNOT, skip the thread, moron.......lol

 

[EvilCat Breath]

17 investigators. 40 attorneys. 500 witnesses. 2800 subpoenas. No collusion. Yet a poster on USMB has figured it all out.

Answer the fucking questions in the O/P.......and since you CANNOT, skip the thread, moron.......lol

No.
No.
No.
No.

As proven by the investigation.

 

[NightFox]

17 investigators. 40 attorneys. 500 witnesses. 2800 subpoenas. No collusion. Yet a poster on USMB has figured it all out.

Yeah Riiiiiiiight.

Apparently Nat's hoping that Mueller's conclusions will be overturned by the Instant Replay Booth...…

It's the kind of shit that happens to people when they become so obsessed with partisan politics that they lose all connection with reality, it's really pathetic.

 

[Hossfly]

17 investigators. 40 attorneys. 500 witnesses. 2800 subpoenas. No collusion. Yet a poster on USMB has figured it all out.

Answer the fucking questions in the O/P.......and since you CANNOT, skip the thread, moron.......lol

No to all. What's your evidence say?