Trading five of the most barbarous Gitmo detainees for one soldier of questionable character ties into the attack in Benghazi. Bear with me on this.
IÂ’ll begin with this video:
The media is making a big deal out of Barack Taqiyya not notifying Congress before releasing enemy combatants. That is pure Bullcrap with a capital B because it does not threaten Taqiyya the Liar in any meaningful way. He breaks the law with impunity and nothing is done. Another meaningless charge of criminal conduct does make Congress and the media look like they are on the ball. Judge Napolitano isnÂ’t buying it (my emphasis):
Megyn Kelly was not happy with the federal statue Napolitano hung around TaqiyyaÂ’s neck as her final comment in the video showed:
Unless Kelly can demonstrate TaqiyyaÂ’s intent is as pure as the driven snow she should NOT spring to his defence so qickly, or at least provide a full debate on the law Judge Napolitano was referencing so the audience can decide for itself.
In 2008, Taqiyya began promising to close Guantanamo. Megyn Kelly can start looking for intent in this video:
Closing Gitmo was one of Taqiyya’s sick attempts to establish himself as the nation’s spiritual leader. In case you missed it he made no “moral” demands on Islam, nor has he ever demanded moral accountability from the Religion of Peace. Indeed, he implied that rough interrogation techniques are worse than the butchery Muslims engage in routinely.
Also, I am not aware that captured enemy combatants are entitled to habeas corpus. I am aware that his broad universal principles means the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Those are the Rights that Muslim countries ignore.
In addition to giving the enemy a helping hand by releasing those five specific prisoners, Taqiyya is keeping his promise to close Gitmo irrespective of the law. It is too bad that he is not as committed to honoring the promises he made about keeping your doctor and your heath insurance.
(Hang in there. IÂ’m coming to Benghazi.)
Prisoner of war
The White House sent an idiot, Chuck Hagel, and a liar, Suzy Five Shows, to last SundayÂ’s talk shows to justify the 5 for 1 swap. They labeled Bowe Bergdahl a prisoner of war in order to make the exchange standard operating procedure; so it is fair to say the five Muslims were our prisoners of war. I could be wrong. This Administration is so goofy they might mean that Bergdahl was a prisoner of war while our 5 Muslims were ordinary criminals. Why is that important? Answer: Enemy combatants from Gitmo were tried in a federal court with the full protection of the US Constitution before the worst of them were released?
Now comes the Benghazi tie-in
Taqiyya the Liar continues to promise:
The fact is: Capturing and punishing the Muslims who killed our people in Benghazi is the last thing Taqiyya the Liar wants. After promising to capture and punish the attackers was put out there by the White House somebody must have asked: “What are we going to with them if we do capture them?” They could not put them in Gitmo because they were in the process of shutting it down.
At some point they had to realize they could not try the Benghazi attackers in a military court because that would have been an admission that the homemade video story was an absolute lie, a lie they are still denying.
They could not try the Benghazi attackers as criminals in a federal court because it was sure to come out that the attack was a well-planned military operation.
Bottom line: Nobody is looking for the attackers.
My point: Defining the Bergdahl swap as a prisoner of war exchange strengthens the Select CommitteeÂ’s hand in a way that the White House did not see coming. The question of who issued the order to stand down is now undeniably a case of military versus military rather than our military verses a ragtag spontaneous demonstration. Everybody who has been following the coverup knows that it was always military versus military. The PRISONER OF WAR exchange sets it in cement. There is no reason to waste time inquiring about a homemade video nobody saw.
Finally, Americans quickly grasped the possibility of a real Manchurian candidate, while they cannot come to grips with a Mecca candidate. The only explanation I can offer for that anomaly is that a fictional Manchurian candidate had to be brainwashed while Barack Taqiyya is a true believer in every sense as defined by Eric Hoffer in his masterpiece The True Believer:
IÂ’ll begin with this video:
The media is making a big deal out of Barack Taqiyya not notifying Congress before releasing enemy combatants. That is pure Bullcrap with a capital B because it does not threaten Taqiyya the Liar in any meaningful way. He breaks the law with impunity and nothing is done. Another meaningless charge of criminal conduct does make Congress and the media look like they are on the ball. Judge Napolitano isnÂ’t buying it (my emphasis):
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: As if a signing statement, a piece of paper he signs at the time he signs the law into existence changes the law. It doesn't under our system. But Megyn, this is by far the lesser of the two laws that he violated. He and his team violated the federal statute which makes criminal providing material assistance to a terrorist organization. This includes money, this includes ceramic mugs, this includes maps, this includes professional services, and this includes releasing human assets back to a terrorist organization. President Obama's Justice Department has successfully prosecuted people for providing material assistance to terrorist organizations and now he himself has done so by letting these five guys loose...
He violated the law by allowing assets to go back to a terrorist organization. You canÂ’t erect a telephone pole, you canÂ’t repair a laptop, you canÂ’t repair a tooth if youÂ’re a dentist for these organizations without violating federal statute.
Megyn Kelly was not happy with the federal statue Napolitano hung around TaqiyyaÂ’s neck as her final comment in the video showed:
But the 2nd part of the statue requires intent that the support be used to cause harm against us.
Unless Kelly can demonstrate TaqiyyaÂ’s intent is as pure as the driven snow she should NOT spring to his defence so qickly, or at least provide a full debate on the law Judge Napolitano was referencing so the audience can decide for itself.
In 2008, Taqiyya began promising to close Guantanamo. Megyn Kelly can start looking for intent in this video:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=8USRg3h4AdE]Obama's Promise to immediately close Guantanamo - YouTube[/ame]
Closing Gitmo was one of Taqiyya’s sick attempts to establish himself as the nation’s spiritual leader. In case you missed it he made no “moral” demands on Islam, nor has he ever demanded moral accountability from the Religion of Peace. Indeed, he implied that rough interrogation techniques are worse than the butchery Muslims engage in routinely.
Also, I am not aware that captured enemy combatants are entitled to habeas corpus. I am aware that his broad universal principles means the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Those are the Rights that Muslim countries ignore.
In addition to giving the enemy a helping hand by releasing those five specific prisoners, Taqiyya is keeping his promise to close Gitmo irrespective of the law. It is too bad that he is not as committed to honoring the promises he made about keeping your doctor and your heath insurance.
(Hang in there. IÂ’m coming to Benghazi.)
Prisoner of war
The White House sent an idiot, Chuck Hagel, and a liar, Suzy Five Shows, to last SundayÂ’s talk shows to justify the 5 for 1 swap. They labeled Bowe Bergdahl a prisoner of war in order to make the exchange standard operating procedure; so it is fair to say the five Muslims were our prisoners of war. I could be wrong. This Administration is so goofy they might mean that Bergdahl was a prisoner of war while our 5 Muslims were ordinary criminals. Why is that important? Answer: Enemy combatants from Gitmo were tried in a federal court with the full protection of the US Constitution before the worst of them were released?
We have seen the negative consequences of attempting to bring al Qaeda-trained operatives to trial in U.S. civilian courts before. In 2009, under the direction of Attorney General Eric Holder, the trial of suspect Ahmed Ghailani was moved from Guantanamo Bay to federal court in New York. Ghailani helped plan and carry out the 1998 U.S. Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. Due to the legal rights and protections given to Ghailani by moving that trial, critical evidence was made inadmissible and as a result prosecutors were only successful in convicting Ghailani on a paltry conspiracy charge. He was acquitted on the 200 or more murder charges and a myriad of other charges. This case showed how vulnerable our justice system is to manipulation by al Qaeda operatives.
Terrorists Shouldn't Be Tried in the Same Courts as U.S. Citizens
By Danny Gonzalez March 12, 2013
Terrorists Shouldn't Be Tried in the Same Courts as U.S. Citizens - US News
Now comes the Benghazi tie-in
Taqiyya the Liar continues to promise:
The fact is: Capturing and punishing the Muslims who killed our people in Benghazi is the last thing Taqiyya the Liar wants. After promising to capture and punish the attackers was put out there by the White House somebody must have asked: “What are we going to with them if we do capture them?” They could not put them in Gitmo because they were in the process of shutting it down.
At some point they had to realize they could not try the Benghazi attackers in a military court because that would have been an admission that the homemade video story was an absolute lie, a lie they are still denying.
They could not try the Benghazi attackers as criminals in a federal court because it was sure to come out that the attack was a well-planned military operation.
Bottom line: Nobody is looking for the attackers.
My point: Defining the Bergdahl swap as a prisoner of war exchange strengthens the Select CommitteeÂ’s hand in a way that the White House did not see coming. The question of who issued the order to stand down is now undeniably a case of military versus military rather than our military verses a ragtag spontaneous demonstration. Everybody who has been following the coverup knows that it was always military versus military. The PRISONER OF WAR exchange sets it in cement. There is no reason to waste time inquiring about a homemade video nobody saw.
Finally, Americans quickly grasped the possibility of a real Manchurian candidate, while they cannot come to grips with a Mecca candidate. The only explanation I can offer for that anomaly is that a fictional Manchurian candidate had to be brainwashed while Barack Taqiyya is a true believer in every sense as defined by Eric Hoffer in his masterpiece The True Believer:
[The true believerÂ’s] innermost craving is for a new life - a rebirth - or, failing this, a chance to acquire new elements of pride, confidence, hope, a sense of purpose and worth by identification with a holy cause. An active mass-movement offers them opportunities for both. If they join the movement as full converts they are reborn to a new life in its close-knit collective body, or if attracted as sympathizers they find elements of pride, confidence, and purpose by identifying with the efforts, achievements, and prospects of the movement. (p. 12-13)
But the true believer who is wholly assimilated into a compact collective body is no longer frustrated. He has found a new identity and a new life. He is one of the chosen, bolstered and protected by invincible powers, and destined to inherit the earth. His is a state of mind the very opposite of that of the frustrated individual; yet he displays, with increased intensity, all the reactions which are symptomatic of inner tension and insecurity. (p. 126)
All active mass movements strive, therefore, to interpose a fact-proof screen between the faithful and the realities of the world. They do this by claiming that the ultimate and absolute truth is already embodied in their doctrine and that there is no truth or certitude outside it. The facts on which the true believer bases his conclusions must not be derived from his experience or observation but from holy writ. (p. 79)
To be in possession of an absolute truth is to have a net of familiarity spread over the whole of eternity. There are no surprises and no unknowns. All questions have already been answered, all decisions made, all eventualities foreseen. The true believer is without wonder and hesitation. (p. 82)
The act of self-denial seems to confer on us the right to be harsh and merciless towards others. The impression somehow prevails that the true believer, particularly the religious individual, is a humble person. The truth is that the surrendering and humbling of the self breed pride and arrogance. The true believer is apt to see himself as one of the chosen, the salt of the earth, the light of the world, a prince disguised in meekness, who is destined to inherit this earth and the kingdom of heaven, too. He who is not of his faith is evil; he who will not listen shall perish. (p. 99-100)
[The true believer] subordinates creative work to the advancement of the movement. Literature, art and science must be propagandistic and they must be "practical." The true-believing writer, artist or scientist does not create to express himself, or to save his soul or to discover the true and the beautiful. His task, as he see it, is to warn, to advise, to urge, to glorify and to denounce. (p. 155)