Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
When did or was, Briebart ever a news source??
Compare Breitbart and the New York Once-Upon-a-Times, and Breitbart is towering over the NYT for accuracy, covering all the news and for integrity.
And they do not harbor anti-Semitic racists on their editorial staff like the NYT does.
What's wrong? Changing the subject already? Fer chrissakes, it's your own topic!Did the NYT spend two years covering a fake Russiagate story? Yep.You mean "Fake News" sources?
Did the NYT give creedance to the Bret Kavanaugh slander mill? Yep.
Does the NYT cover up criminality by national Democrats like Hillary Clinton, Barney Frank and Joe Biden? You know it.
Is the NYT a piece of shyte extension of the leftwing Marxist Pravda Machine USA? Without a doubt.
Founded in 2007 by the late Andrew Breitbart, the site came into its own under Bannon — who took over after Breitbart’s death in 2012. During the 2016 election, the early Trump backer described the operation as “the platform for the alt-right” and found a huge audience with shocking headlines like “Birth control makes women unattractive and crazy” and “Bill Kristol: Republican spoiler, renegade Jew.”
The fact that you cannot see the blatant anti-semitism makes you and anti-Semite.Ummm..I didn't read the original article so, ...where is the anti-semite part?Good Gawd, The NYT appears to be a nest of anti-Semitic racist Marxists.
Another New York Times Editor Made Racist, Anti-Semitic Comments
Jazmine Hughes, an associate editor of the New York Times Magazine, has made a series of racist and antisemitic comments on social media over a multi-year span. A number of the tweets came from Hughes’s personal account, which is associated with her Times email, after she was hired by the outlet in April 2015 and continued well into 2017.
Breitbart News has been able to confirm the authenticity of the tweets, which are still visible on Hughes’s page at the time of the publication of this story. While Twitter has not officially verified Hughes’ account, her official New York Times website biography links to the account, confirming it is in fact hers....
Hughes is a high-profile New York Times editor. Forbes highlighted her on its 2018 “30 Under 30” list of influential media figures. The business magazine even conducted a brief interview with her, where she promoted herself as a champion of “diverse storytelling,” in the words of Forbes......
The article in question discussed what Hughes saw as the “gentrification” of humor at “white people’s expense.” Hughes argued that “racialized humor is an instrument that people of color can use to placate themselves in the face of the overwhelming reality: It’s just better to be Caucasian.”
“By making fun of white people, people of color can, in a small way, push back against stereotypes, opposing racial humor by inverting it,” Hughes wrote, claiming such jokes “gain membership in a club open to all people of color, a space impervious to white hegemony.”
The article’s premise is that as white people become more aware of systematic inequalities, they begin to make light of their privilege in an effort to sympathize with communities of color. In most cases, however, Hughes argued such attempts at solidarity only reinforce the status quo at the expense of people of color.
“This is how the party ends—with white people wanting in on the joke so badly that they create a separate category of ‘cool’ white people who mock their own whiteness in an effort at solidarity,” she wrote.
The article appears to be the only one Hughes authored for the New Republic. Since joining the Times, she has occasionally written pieces centered on the intersection of race and culture. Her most recent project for the Times’ magazine was the 1619 Project, a comprehensive series of articles and essays arguing that slavery was the institution that fundamentally shaped the modern United States.
Nolte: New York Times' Summer of Fake News and Public Meltdowns
Briebart is not NEWS.... they take the hard work of news agencies investigative reporters that these news agencies have paid and hired for research, and takes these news agency's stories, and OPINES on them, creating their own bastardized made up stories, with never having a foot on the ground doing any legwork on the story.... for the most part.When did or was, Briebart ever a news source??
Compare Breitbart and the New York Once-Upon-a-Times, and Breitbart is towering over the NYT for accuracy, covering all the news and for integrity.
And they do not harbor anti-Semitic racists on their editorial staff like the NYT does.
So if I take a hardcore card-carrying member of the KKK and drop him off in China, is he suddenly cured?blacks can't be racists--only whites can be racists
Pretty much. Racism requires the institutionalized ability to enforce your hatred.
They have become the "token" white at the party.Good Gawd, The NYT appears to be a nest of anti-Semitic racist Marxists.
Another New York Times Editor Made Racist, Anti-Semitic Comments
Jazmine Hughes, an associate editor of the New York Times Magazine, has made a series of racist and antisemitic comments on social media over a multi-year span. A number of the tweets came from Hughes’s personal account, which is associated with her Times email, after she was hired by the outlet in April 2015 and continued well into 2017.
Breitbart News has been able to confirm the authenticity of the tweets, which are still visible on Hughes’s page at the time of the publication of this story. While Twitter has not officially verified Hughes’ account, her official New York Times website biography links to the account, confirming it is in fact hers....
Hughes is a high-profile New York Times editor. Forbes highlighted her on its 2018 “30 Under 30” list of influential media figures. The business magazine even conducted a brief interview with her, where she promoted herself as a champion of “diverse storytelling,” in the words of Forbes......
The article in question discussed what Hughes saw as the “gentrification” of humor at “white people’s expense.” Hughes argued that “racialized humor is an instrument that people of color can use to placate themselves in the face of the overwhelming reality: It’s just better to be Caucasian.”
“By making fun of white people, people of color can, in a small way, push back against stereotypes, opposing racial humor by inverting it,” Hughes wrote, claiming such jokes “gain membership in a club open to all people of color, a space impervious to white hegemony.”
The article’s premise is that as white people become more aware of systematic inequalities, they begin to make light of their privilege in an effort to sympathize with communities of color. In most cases, however, Hughes argued such attempts at solidarity only reinforce the status quo at the expense of people of color.
“This is how the party ends—with white people wanting in on the joke so badly that they create a separate category of ‘cool’ white people who mock their own whiteness in an effort at solidarity,” she wrote.
The article appears to be the only one Hughes authored for the New Republic. Since joining the Times, she has occasionally written pieces centered on the intersection of race and culture. Her most recent project for the Times’ magazine was the 1619 Project, a comprehensive series of articles and essays arguing that slavery was the institution that fundamentally shaped the modern United States.
Nolte: New York Times' Summer of Fake News and Public Meltdowns
Briebart is not NEWS.... they take the hard work of news agencies investigative reporters that these news agencies have paid and hired for research, and takes these news agency's stories, and OPINES on them, creating their own bastardized made up stories, with never having a foot on the ground doing any legwork on the story.... for the most part.Compare Breitbart and the New York Once-Upon-a-Times, and Breitbart is towering over the NYT for accuracy, covering all the news and for integrity.
And they do not harbor anti-Semitic racists on their editorial staff like the NYT does.
blacks can't be racists--only whites can be racists
Pretty much. Racism requires the institutionalized ability to enforce your hatred.
Breitbart does refer a lot of news stories kind of like Drudge does, but they also have their own stable of investigative reporters doing new stories.Briebart is not NEWS.... they take the hard work of news agencies investigative reporters that these news agencies have paid and hired for research, and takes these news agency's stories, and OPINES on them, creating their own bastardized made up stories, with never having a foot on the ground doing any legwork on the story.... for the most part.
and they commit hate crimes at TWICE the rate of whitesblacks can't be racists--only whites can be racists
Pretty much. Racism requires the institutionalized ability to enforce your hatred.
No, it only requires the ability to enforce your hatred.
Blacks have the ability to enforce their hatred, as is proven by the large amount of assaults, rapes, and murders against white people perpetrated by blacks.
yes, we know..the blacks are perfect and inhuman
THERE's your problem right there---you don't know what racism is !!!
racism
noun
rac·ism | \ ˈrā-ˌsi-zəm also -ˌshi- \
Definition of racism
1: a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
blacks are more racist than whitesblacks can't be racists--only whites can be racists
Pretty much. Racism requires the institutionalized ability to enforce your hatred.
Racist minorities thank you for the passionate ass-kissing, but they still hate you.blacks can't be racists--only whites can be racists
Pretty much. Racism requires the institutionalized ability to enforce your hatred.
Well, c'mon, it's not like people get kicked out of the left for hating Jews.When did or was, Briebart ever a news source??
Compare Breitbart and the New York Once-Upon-a-Times, and Breitbart is towering over the NYT for accuracy, covering all the news and for integrity.
And they do not harbor anti-Semitic racists on their editorial staff like the NYT does.
blacks are more racist than whites
they eat/shit/sleep/dream/breathe/etc RACE RACE RACE
Racist minorities thank you for the passionate ass-kissing, but they still hate you.
Nope. They still hate you.Racist minorities thank you for the passionate ass-kissing, but they still hate you.
Really? Never met that person. In fact, I can honestly say that as an adult, no person of Color has really ever wronged me.
Most of the high-grade douchebaggery I've encountered in my life has uniformly involved other white males.
