96% Of Australians 16 and Older are Fully Vaccinated for Covid-19 and Guess What

[scruffy]

Just about all of the people who died suddenly were vaxxed. If an athlete died, you can be sure that person was fully vaxxed.

That should be very easy to prove statistically.

 

[scruffy]

Of course you need a properly defined study that goes after the right information.

This one for example, is a waste of taxpayer money

The committee explored Paratz et al. (2023), who used an Australian population study of one type of SUD, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), obtained from a registry of about 4.49 million persons, 4.2 million of whom were 5–50 years old and eligible for vaccination. The authors report unexplained deaths by month, April 2019–March 2022. Deaths when vaccines (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and ChAdOx1-S^{<a href="Sudden Death and COVID-19 Vaccines - Evidence Review of the Adverse Effects of COVID-19 Vaccination and Intramuscular Vaccine Administration - NCBI Bookshelf" data-bk-pop-href="#pAN_J">1</a>}) were available were compared to immediate earlier time periods. The vaccines available and used during the period of analysis varied, and the data do not identify which vaccines were given to any specific individual.

During the study period, 2,242 people experienced OHCA; the authors noted no variation in median monthly rates during the three time periods. Within 30 days of their COVID-19 vaccination (type not documented), 38 people died and were referred for forensic assessment: “No differences were seen in underlying causes of death compared with previously published age-matched data” (Paratz et al., 2023).

The authors only assessed sudden cardiac arrest, unascertained sudden cardiac arrest, and myocarditis, and it was not clear how many deaths resulted from each type of OHCA. They used a clear definition of OHCA, and in one analysis, they linked the history of COVID-19 vaccination within 30 days. The number of deaths was modest, and it was not clear which vaccines were associated with those deaths. The report showed no evidence of an association between the SUD syndrome and vaccination. Paratz et al. (2023) also included an analysis of sudden death within 30 days of vaccination in “young people” without specifying the age. They reported that causes of death in that population “were consistent with pre-pandemic causative profiles,” but specific data were not included in the paper.

Yet it still shows up on the NIH web site.

"Within 30 days of the jab" tells us nothing. And we need to look at cancers in addition to cardiac arrest.

It is a medical and scientific fact that the jab causes clotting and cell membrane fusion. You might be able to live with those things for a little while, but eventually they'll get you.

 

[scruffy]

NIH is beating around the bush.

Apparently they don't want to fund a proper study.

Any competent data scientist could perform such a study. NIH has more than enough data for it.

 

[Captain Caveman]

No, if you get cancer and smoke you cannot prove that smoking caused the cancer.

Try again.

This smoking malarkey, gets blamed for everything. The WHO reports that the percentage of adults using tobacco worldwide has declined from about one in three in 2000 to roughly one in five in 2022. Yet in the same breath, they claim part of the increase in the world's cancer rates is due to smoking.

smoking is reducing = cancer is rising

So in theory, everyone should start smoking to reduce cancer?

 

[HikerGuy83]

This smoking malarkey, gets blamed for everything. The WHO reports that the percentage of adults using tobacco worldwide has declined from about one in three in 2000 to roughly one in five in 2022. Yet in the same breath, they claim part of the increase in the world's cancer rates is due to smoking.

smoking is reducing = cancer is rising

So in theory, everyone should start smoking to reduce cancer?

Are you talking lung cancer or cancer in general?

Everything I've seen says there is a clear relationship between lung cancer and smoking. You can get it without smoking. But if you smoke, your chances of getting lung cancer are much higher than someone who does not.

Maybe they changed their minds?

 

[luiza]

No but if scores of young people without any history of illness or pre existing conditions dropped dead suddenly at an alarming rate after getting the jab, there is high chance of correlation and causation.

He has never heard of the Bradford Hill Criteria which outline the evidence of a causal relationship between a presumed cause and an observed effect .
That is ,give the math circumstances showing when and how Correlation is also Causation .

 

[luiza]

This smoking malarkey, gets blamed for everything. The WHO reports that the percentage of adults using tobacco worldwide has declined from about one in three in 2000 to roughly one in five in 2022. Yet in the same breath, they claim part of the increase in the world's cancer rates is due to smoking.

smoking is reducing = cancer is rising

So in theory, everyone should start smoking to reduce cancer?

Too much for here but Nicotine is 100% non addictive .
In fact it is an amazing treatment for just about any disease you care to mention
It is the pyrazines that they deliberately add which cause addiction . Up to 26 from memory .

Perhaps the greatest scam that Big Pharma and regulating bodies have so far got away with .

Out of interest ------- Fruit and vegetables that contain Nicotine -- list headed by Aubergines , Bell Peppers , Potatoes and Tomatoes .

 

[Votto]

This smoking malarkey, gets blamed for everything. The WHO reports that the percentage of adults using tobacco worldwide has declined from about one in three in 2000 to roughly one in five in 2022. Yet in the same breath, they claim part of the increase in the world's cancer rates is due to smoking.

smoking is reducing = cancer is rising

So in theory, everyone should start smoking to reduce cancer?

Yes!

 

[Marener]

Correlation for smoking and increased cancer rates does not prove causation either, however, anyone with half a brain cell understands it causes it anyway.

Funny, because people like you wanted us to believe that thousands of people just happened to die right as they got COVID and it had nothing to do with their viral pneumonia.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

This smoking malarkey, gets blamed for everything. The WHO reports that the percentage of adults using tobacco worldwide has declined from about one in three in 2000 to roughly one in five in 2022. Yet in the same breath, they claim part of the increase in the world's cancer rates is due to smoking.

smoking is reducing = cancer is rising

So in theory, everyone should start smoking to reduce cancer?

They’re smoking pot. They think it’s health smoke.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Cancer rates in Australians under 50 are rising at a pace that's alarming doctors and scientists​

Cancer Rates in Young Australians​

Cancer rates among Australians under the age of 50 are rising at an alarming pace, with some types of cancer showing unprecedented increases, particularly in those in their 30s and 40s. Data from Cancer Australia indicates that between 2000 and 2024, early onset prostate cancer in 30 to 39-year-olds increased by 500%, pancreatic cancer by 200%, liver cancer by 150%, uterine cancer by 138%, and kidney cancer by 85%. This trend is not unique to Australia, as similar increases have been observed in the United States and other wealthy nations.

Australia is a world leader in the rise of early onset bowel (colorectal) cancer, with rates in 30 to 39-year-olds increasing by 173% since 2000. The stage at which these cancers are diagnosed is often late, meaning they are more likely to have spread and are harder to treat. The technical term for this phenomenon is early onset cancer, and it is now considered an emerging global epidemic.

Scientists are investigating the underlying causes, which are believed to be linked to environmental and lifestyle factors, collectively known as the "exposome". While inherited genetic mutations like BRCA or Lynch Syndrome are not the primary cause in most young patients, researchers believe that toxins and toxic influences interacting with genes are responsible. Key factors under investigation include the childhood obesity epidemic, which began in the 1960s and has led to a rise in obesity among young adults. This is particularly relevant for liver cancer, as obesity and diabetes are major drivers of liver disease and cirrhosis. Changes in the gut microbiome, potentially due to increased antibiotic use, consumption of ultra-processed foods, and rising caesarean section rates, are also being studied as possible contributors.

Research into the DNA of tumours has revealed a distinct pattern in younger patients with colorectal cancer, suggesting a unique "fingerprint" of damage that points to early-life exposures. The challenge lies in identifying the specific exposures that occurred decades ago, during the childhood and early adulthood of today's young cancer patients. The Human Exposome Project is a major international effort aiming to document these environmental and lifestyle factors to better understand their role in disease.
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.

rnz.co.nz
Cancer rates in Australians under 50 are rising at a pace that's alarming doctors and scientists | RNZ News

abc.net.au
Cancer rates in Australians under 50 are rising at a pace that's alarming doctors and scientists - ABC News

theguardian.com
Too young: why are Australians under 50 increasingly being diagnosed with cancer? | Health | The Guardian

australian5.com
Cancer Rates Are Skyrocketing in Young Australians – Australian News Locally

aihw.gov.au
Cancer in adolescents and young adults in Australia 2023, Summary - Australian Institute of Health and Welfare

cancer.org.au
Facts and figures | Cancer Council

aihw.gov.au
Cancer in adolescents and young adults in Australia, Summary - Australian Institute of Health and Welfare

www1.racgp.org.au
newsGP - ‘Disturbing’ spike in yout
newsGP - ‘Disturbing’ spike in youth cancer
newsGP - ‘Disturbing’ spike in youth cancer
So tell me, do you think there is a correlation?
I say absolutely, unless you are a denier and big pharma shill.

Correlation does not mean causation.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Cancer and myocardial issues

Myocarditis is rarely fatal and easily treated. You need to get off that train.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

This smoking malarkey, gets blamed for everything. The WHO reports that the percentage of adults using tobacco worldwide has declined from about one in three in 2000 to roughly one in five in 2022. Yet in the same breath, they claim part of the increase in the world's cancer rates is due to smoking.

smoking is reducing = cancer is rising

So in theory, everyone should start smoking to reduce cancer?

They aren't smoking tobacco.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Myocarditis is rarely fatal and easily treated. You need to get off that train.

What? You think getting myocardial issues from a " vaccine" is acceptable? You got like three clot shots didn't you?