Marion Morrison
Diamond Member
- Feb 10, 2017
- 59,298
- 16,852
- 2,190
- Banned
- #101
Up to 5 million Russians voted for Trump
Proof? I think you just pulled that straight out of your colon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Up to 5 million Russians voted for Trump
Yea, we were right,
Study supports Trump: 5.7 million noncitizens may have cast illegal votes
A research group in New Jersey has taken a fresh look at postelection polling data and concluded that the number of noncitizens voting illegally in U.S. elections is likely far greater than previous estimates.
As many as 5.7 million noncitizens may have voted in the 2008 election, which put Barack Obama in the White House.
Really?
A conservative think tank pulls numbers out of their ass and you scream "PROOF!".
Did you actually read the article? "594,000 to 5.7 million voted". Wow, that's some accurate investigating right there. There's only a factor of 10x for a margin of error.
What a joke.
The joke is you idiotic Moon Bats that are in such denial that you can't connect simple dots. Lots of illegals, lax voter ID requirements, big turn out for Crooked Hillary. Don't be a dumbass and deny something as simple as that.
Your filthy Corrupt Hillary bitch lost. Because of the EC the Illegals weren't able to steal the election for the Democrats and all America should be grateful.
You can be in denial and have your head up your ass all you want. It just makes you look like a fool. Continue to be in denial. The dumber you Moon Bats are the fewer elections you will win and the better off the country will be.
And if there was any proof of this, I would be with you on this. But a "self proclaimed conservative" that pulls numbers out of their ads, butchering a study in the process, does not equal proof.
Just follow the money. In this case the votes.
See who had the most votes for Crooked Hillary, the most lax voter ID laws and the most illegals. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that one out.
LOLOLFact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker ...What’s not to love? Righties can never show Snopes is wrong. Shaking your cane at them certainly doesn’t.That and Snopes. Liberals love them and pretend they deliver stone tablets from Moses.There are no facts in "Politifact."Politi"fact" is so far left it runs in circles.
You hate facts almost as much as you hate education, don't you?
https://dailycaller.com/2016/06/17/fact-checking-snopes-websites...
Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.
EXPOSED - Guess Who is REALLY Behind Snopes.com?
www.angrypatriotmovement.com/who-is-behind-snopes
But Lacapria simply joins the very small crew at Snopes who have existed as bias from the start. David and Barbara Mikkelson, the founders and proprietors of Snopes, have been found on many occasions to have “erred” on the side of the truth best benefiting the Left’s narrative on issues.
Youre not going to get very far using far right sites for critique of snopes.Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker ...What’s not to love? Righties can never show Snopes is wrong. Shaking your cane at them certainly doesn’t.That and Snopes. Liberals love them and pretend they deliver stone tablets from Moses.There are no facts in "Politifact."Politi"fact" is so far left it runs in circles.
You hate facts almost as much as you hate education, don't you?
https://dailycaller.com/2016/06/17/fact-checking-snopes-websites...
Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.
EXPOSED - Guess Who is REALLY Behind Snopes.com?
www.angrypatriotmovement.com/who-is-behind-snopes
But Lacapria simply joins the very small crew at Snopes who have existed as bias from the start. David and Barbara Mikkelson, the founders and proprietors of Snopes, have been found on many occasions to have “erred” on the side of the truth best benefiting the Left’s narrative on issues.
Keep following known liars. I'm sure they turned a new leaf, I am amused by your gullible faith.LOLOLFact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker ...What’s not to love? Righties can never show Snopes is wrong. Shaking your cane at them certainly doesn’t.That and Snopes. Liberals love them and pretend they deliver stone tablets from Moses.There are no facts in "Politifact."You hate facts almost as much as you hate education, don't you?
https://dailycaller.com/2016/06/17/fact-checking-snopes-websites...
Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.
EXPOSED - Guess Who is REALLY Behind Snopes.com?
www.angrypatriotmovement.com/who-is-behind-snopes
But Lacapria simply joins the very small crew at Snopes who have existed as bias from the start. David and Barbara Mikkelson, the founders and proprietors of Snopes, have been found on many occasions to have “erred” on the side of the truth best benefiting the Left’s narrative on issues.
Bitching about the writers doesn’t prove their assessments are wrong.
What a dupe you are, eh?
![]()
So just go with extreme left biased sources? No thanks. I don't buy their steady diet of propaganda BS.Youre not going to get very far using far right sites for critique of snopes.Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker ...What’s not to love? Righties can never show Snopes is wrong. Shaking your cane at them certainly doesn’t.That and Snopes. Liberals love them and pretend they deliver stone tablets from Moses.There are no facts in "Politifact."You hate facts almost as much as you hate education, don't you?
https://dailycaller.com/2016/06/17/fact-checking-snopes-websites...
Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.
EXPOSED - Guess Who is REALLY Behind Snopes.com?
www.angrypatriotmovement.com/who-is-behind-snopes
But Lacapria simply joins the very small crew at Snopes who have existed as bias from the start. David and Barbara Mikkelson, the founders and proprietors of Snopes, have been found on many occasions to have “erred” on the side of the truth best benefiting the Left’s narrative on issues.
Daily Caller far right bias, factual reporting: mixed
Angry Patriot is even worse; extreme right conspiracy
![]()
You can call them liars all you want — until you prove Snopes’ articles are wrong, you look like a 4 year old girl crying about having her Barbie® taken away.Keep following known liars. I'm sure they turned a new leaf, I am amused by your gullible faith.LOLOLFact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker ...What’s not to love? Righties can never show Snopes is wrong. Shaking your cane at them certainly doesn’t.That and Snopes. Liberals love them and pretend they deliver stone tablets from Moses.There are no facts in "Politifact."
https://dailycaller.com/2016/06/17/fact-checking-snopes-websites...
Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.
EXPOSED - Guess Who is REALLY Behind Snopes.com?
www.angrypatriotmovement.com/who-is-behind-snopes
But Lacapria simply joins the very small crew at Snopes who have existed as bias from the start. David and Barbara Mikkelson, the founders and proprietors of Snopes, have been found on many occasions to have “erred” on the side of the truth best benefiting the Left’s narrative on issues.
Bitching about the writers doesn’t prove their assessments are wrong.
What a dupe you are, eh?
![]()
Yea, we were right,
Study supports Trump: 5.7 million noncitizens may have cast illegal votes
A research group in New Jersey has taken a fresh look at postelection polling data and concluded that the number of noncitizens voting illegally in U.S. elections is likely far greater than previous estimates.
As many as 5.7 million noncitizens may have voted in the 2008 election, which put Barack Obama in the White House.
And by “biased,” you mean accurate assments you don’t like.So just go with extreme left biased sources? No thanks. I don't buy their steady diet of propaganda BS.Youre not going to get very far using far right sites for critique of snopes.Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker ...What’s not to love? Righties can never show Snopes is wrong. Shaking your cane at them certainly doesn’t.That and Snopes. Liberals love them and pretend they deliver stone tablets from Moses.There are no facts in "Politifact."
https://dailycaller.com/2016/06/17/fact-checking-snopes-websites...
Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.
EXPOSED - Guess Who is REALLY Behind Snopes.com?
www.angrypatriotmovement.com/who-is-behind-snopes
But Lacapria simply joins the very small crew at Snopes who have existed as bias from the start. David and Barbara Mikkelson, the founders and proprietors of Snopes, have been found on many occasions to have “erred” on the side of the truth best benefiting the Left’s narrative on issues.
Daily Caller far right bias, factual reporting: mixed
Angry Patriot is even worse; extreme right conspiracy
![]()
Yea, we were right,
Study supports Trump: 5.7 million noncitizens may have cast illegal votes
A research group in New Jersey has taken a fresh look at postelection polling data and concluded that the number of noncitizens voting illegally in U.S. elections is likely far greater than previous estimates.
As many as 5.7 million noncitizens may have voted in the 2008 election, which put Barack Obama in the White House.
Really?
A conservative think tank pulls numbers out of their ass and you scream "PROOF!".
Did you actually read the article? "594,000 to 5.7 million voted". Wow, that's some accurate investigating right there. There's only a factor of 10x for a margin of error.
What a joke.
The joke is you idiotic Moon Bats that are in such denial that you can't connect simple dots. Lots of illegals, lax voter ID requirements, big turn out for Crooked Hillary. Don't be a dumbass and deny something as simple as that.
Your filthy Corrupt Hillary bitch lost. Because of the EC the Illegals weren't able to steal the election for the Democrats and all America should be grateful.
You can be in denial and have your head up your ass all you want. It just makes you look like a fool. Continue to be in denial. The dumber you Moon Bats are the fewer elections you will win and the better off the country will be.
And if there was any proof of this, I would be with you on this. But a "self proclaimed conservative" that pulls numbers out of their ads, butchering a study in the process, does not equal proof.
Just follow the money. In this case the votes.
See who had the most votes for Crooked Hillary, the most lax voter ID laws and the most illegals. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that one out.
I don't care who voted for Hillary, if they were legal voters then they can vote for Mickey Mouse for all I care.
There is no evidence of millions of illegals voting. Trump's own commission couldn't find any evidence and was disbanded. And you keep spouting nonsense about "following the money". Fuck the money, show me the evidence.
And making up their own numbers, no less.Yea, we were right,
Study supports Trump: 5.7 million noncitizens may have cast illegal votes
A research group in New Jersey has taken a fresh look at postelection polling data and concluded that the number of noncitizens voting illegally in U.S. elections is likely far greater than previous estimates.
As many as 5.7 million noncitizens may have voted in the 2008 election, which put Barack Obama in the White House.
A self-admitted conservative think tank, which bases their findings on someone else's survey which isn't restricted to citizens, has come up with some phony numbers which are breathlessly reported by the Moonie Times. Alternate facts at their finest.
And by “biased,” you mean accurate assments you don’t like.So just go with extreme left biased sources? No thanks. I don't buy their steady diet of propaganda BS.Youre not going to get very far using far right sites for critique of snopes.Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker ...What’s not to love? Righties can never show Snopes is wrong. Shaking your cane at them certainly doesn’t.That and Snopes. Liberals love them and pretend they deliver stone tablets from Moses.
https://dailycaller.com/2016/06/17/fact-checking-snopes-websites...
Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.
EXPOSED - Guess Who is REALLY Behind Snopes.com?
www.angrypatriotmovement.com/who-is-behind-snopes
But Lacapria simply joins the very small crew at Snopes who have existed as bias from the start. David and Barbara Mikkelson, the founders and proprietors of Snopes, have been found on many occasions to have “erred” on the side of the truth best benefiting the Left’s narrative on issues.
Daily Caller far right bias, factual reporting: mixed
Angry Patriot is even worse; extreme right conspiracy
![]()
Must I spoon feed you? You look like a gullible jackass.You can call them liars all you want — until you prove Snopes’ articles are wrong, you look like a 4 year old girl crying about having her Barbie® taken away.Keep following known liars. I'm sure they turned a new leaf, I am amused by your gullible faith.LOLOLFact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker ...What’s not to love? Righties can never show Snopes is wrong. Shaking your cane at them certainly doesn’t.That and Snopes. Liberals love them and pretend they deliver stone tablets from Moses.
https://dailycaller.com/2016/06/17/fact-checking-snopes-websites...
Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.
EXPOSED - Guess Who is REALLY Behind Snopes.com?
www.angrypatriotmovement.com/who-is-behind-snopes
But Lacapria simply joins the very small crew at Snopes who have existed as bias from the start. David and Barbara Mikkelson, the founders and proprietors of Snopes, have been found on many occasions to have “erred” on the side of the truth best benefiting the Left’s narrative on issues.
Bitching about the writers doesn’t prove their assessments are wrong.
What a dupe you are, eh?
![]()
Youre not going to get very far using far right sites for critique of snopes.Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker ...What’s not to love? Righties can never show Snopes is wrong. Shaking your cane at them certainly doesn’t.That and Snopes. Liberals love them and pretend they deliver stone tablets from Moses.There are no facts in "Politifact."You hate facts almost as much as you hate education, don't you?
https://dailycaller.com/2016/06/17/fact-checking-snopes-websites...
Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.
EXPOSED - Guess Who is REALLY Behind Snopes.com?
www.angrypatriotmovement.com/who-is-behind-snopes
But Lacapria simply joins the very small crew at Snopes who have existed as bias from the start. David and Barbara Mikkelson, the founders and proprietors of Snopes, have been found on many occasions to have “erred” on the side of the truth best benefiting the Left’s narrative on issues.
Daily Caller far right bias, factual reporting: mixed
Angry Patriot is even worse; extreme right conspiracy
![]()
Yea, we were right,
Study supports Trump: 5.7 million noncitizens may have cast illegal votes
A research group in New Jersey has taken a fresh look at postelection polling data and concluded that the number of noncitizens voting illegally in U.S. elections is likely far greater than previous estimates.
As many as 5.7 million noncitizens may have voted in the 2008 election, which put Barack Obama in the White House.
A self-admitted conservative think tank, which bases their findings on someone else's survey which isn't restricted to citizens, has come up with some phony numbers which are breathlessly reported by the Moonie Times. Alternate facts at their finest.
Really?
A conservative think tank pulls numbers out of their ass and you scream "PROOF!".
Did you actually read the article? "594,000 to 5.7 million voted". Wow, that's some accurate investigating right there. There's only a factor of 10x for a margin of error.
What a joke.
The joke is you idiotic Moon Bats that are in such denial that you can't connect simple dots. Lots of illegals, lax voter ID requirements, big turn out for Crooked Hillary. Don't be a dumbass and deny something as simple as that.
Your filthy Corrupt Hillary bitch lost. Because of the EC the Illegals weren't able to steal the election for the Democrats and all America should be grateful.
You can be in denial and have your head up your ass all you want. It just makes you look like a fool. Continue to be in denial. The dumber you Moon Bats are the fewer elections you will win and the better off the country will be.
And if there was any proof of this, I would be with you on this. But a "self proclaimed conservative" that pulls numbers out of their ads, butchering a study in the process, does not equal proof.
Just follow the money. In this case the votes.
See who had the most votes for Crooked Hillary, the most lax voter ID laws and the most illegals. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that one out.
I don't care who voted for Hillary, if they were legal voters then they can vote for Mickey Mouse for all I care.
There is no evidence of millions of illegals voting. Trump's own commission couldn't find any evidence and was disbanded. And you keep spouting nonsense about "following the money". Fuck the money, show me the evidence.
There is a ton of evidence when you look at the number of illegals in this country and the great margin that voted for Crooked Hillary in the areas with lax voter laws and high numbers of Illegals.
All an illegal has to do in those Moon Bat shitholes like in LA or San Fran is to go into a voting place and cast their vote. Nobody is going to stop them.
There is a big incentive for the Illegals to vote for someone that supports open borders and there is a big incentive for the Democrats to let the Illegals vote. Just follow the money.
Good thing it didn't work.
The joke is you idiotic Moon Bats that are in such denial that you can't connect simple dots. Lots of illegals, lax voter ID requirements, big turn out for Crooked Hillary. Don't be a dumbass and deny something as simple as that.
Your filthy Corrupt Hillary bitch lost. Because of the EC the Illegals weren't able to steal the election for the Democrats and all America should be grateful.
You can be in denial and have your head up your ass all you want. It just makes you look like a fool. Continue to be in denial. The dumber you Moon Bats are the fewer elections you will win and the better off the country will be.
And if there was any proof of this, I would be with you on this. But a "self proclaimed conservative" that pulls numbers out of their ads, butchering a study in the process, does not equal proof.
Just follow the money. In this case the votes.
See who had the most votes for Crooked Hillary, the most lax voter ID laws and the most illegals. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that one out.
I don't care who voted for Hillary, if they were legal voters then they can vote for Mickey Mouse for all I care.
There is no evidence of millions of illegals voting. Trump's own commission couldn't find any evidence and was disbanded. And you keep spouting nonsense about "following the money". Fuck the money, show me the evidence.
There is a ton of evidence when you look at the number of illegals in this country and the great margin that voted for Crooked Hillary in the areas with lax voter laws and high numbers of Illegals.
All an illegal has to do in those Moon Bat shitholes like in LA or San Fran is to go into a voting place and cast their vote. Nobody is going to stop them.
There is a big incentive for the Illegals to vote for someone that supports open borders and there is a big incentive for the Democrats to let the Illegals vote. Just follow the money.
Good thing it didn't work.
None of what you posted is evidence. It's just you being butt-hurt over Trump losing the popular vote.