1900-2014 Warming -->Extraordinary or Normal?

[Crick]

You think David Archibald knows more than the dozens of PhDs involved in AR5's WG1?

 

[Billy_Bob]

You think David Archibald knows more than the dozens of PhDs involved in AR5's WG1?

Archibald doing real science or 30 political yes men doing pseudoscience?... There is no comparison here Archibald has it hands down.

IF you read the whole article he has done the math just as I had in my previous posts. Dr Archibald's graphs tell the whole story with a minor addition. That addition is the temp rise from 1900 through 2014 of 0.46 deg C before adjustments by the little Marxists at NOAA/NASA. When that is placed over the graph it shows no water vapor enhancement, NONE! Its not happening... Their runaway temp isn't happening because water vapor does not enhance warming even in higher atmospheric water content.

Replicated science by others.. Ive done this, Dr Archibald has done this, and many others who have came to the same repeatable conclusions... This is how science is done!

AWG FAIL!

Source

 

[Crick]

Replicated science by others.. Ive done this

You just can't put up a post without lying, can you.

 

[Crick]

Archibald doing real science or 30 political yes men doing pseudoscience?... There is no comparison here Archibald has it hands down.

You seem to have the same misconception that a lot of deniers suffer from: the IPCC does no research. The material on which their assessment reports are based is simply research published in peer reviewed journals. It's no being done by politicos. It's being done by scientists. And scientists with a hell of of lot better qualifications than David Archibald.

David Archibald
David Archibald is a Perth, Australia-based scientist working in the fields of oil exploration, climate science, energy and geostrategy. After graduating from Queensland University in geology (geology is not a climate science and this was a bachelor's degree Meet David Archibald The Fringe Scientist Predicting An Ice Age Blog Media Matters for America) in 1979, he worked in coal and oil shale exploration in Queensland (not climate science) and then in oil exploration with Exxon in Sydney (not climate science). A long period in stockbroking (not climate science) in Sydney as an analyst was followed by moving to Perth in 1999 to work for a private investor (not climate science). He subsequently started the oil exploration company Oilex in 2003 (not climate science) and then joined a Canadian-listed oil exploration company in 2006 (not climate science). Also at that time, he was CEO of the mineral explorer Westgold Resource (not climate science).

Mr. Archibald began researching in climate science in 2006 and has published a number of papers in this field, and two books: "Solar Cycle 24" and "The Past and Future of Climate". His climate prediction methodology uses solar cycle length to predict climate up to one solar cycle in advance. Mr Archibald's work in this field was corroborated by three Norwegian scientists in a paper published in February 2012: Solheim, J.E., Stordahl, K. and Humlum, O. "The long sunspot cycle 23 predicts a significant temperature decrease in cycle 24" Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 16 February 2012 (available online here). Mr Archibald has lectured on climate in hearing rooms of the US Senate, in 2011, and the US Congress, in 2013. (Corroborated? What is that supposed to mean? And how does his work in geology, oil and money qualify him to do solar physics?)

Mr. Archibald has been an expert witness in the Supreme Court of NSW in the fields of rolling mills for steel works and petroleum geology (not peer reviewed, not climate science). Also in the steel industry, he consulted on the Amurstal steelworks in Komsomolsk-na-Amur in Far East Russia in the mid-1990s (not peer reviewed, not climate science). In medical research, Mr Archibald was involved in investigating the synergistic effect of combinations of plant flavanols in reversing cancer, specifically sulforaphane and capsaicin (not peer reviewed, not climate science [Despite no background in medical science, Archibald invented a formula for prostate cancer pills along with two Purdue scientists, made from vegetables such as "broccoli and chilli [sic]," and started testing them in clinical trials. According to his biography, "[t]his drug demonstrated efficacy during in vitro trials at Queensland University in 2009 and will be entering human trials in 2012." - MediaMatters]). Also in the medical field, he edited and published a book on the role of isoflavones in modulating the human female hormone system (not peer reviewed, not climate science). This book (not peer reviewed) is available as "Hormones with Harmony" on Kindle.

More recently Mr Archibald has concentrated on predicting the effect on civilisation of the reducing supply and higher price of energy, MENA region population growth and collapse, the impact of deteriorating climate on agriculture, nuclear weapons proliferation and Chinese irredentism. These themes are brought together in his book (not peer reviewed)published in 2014 - The Twilight of Abundance.

Mr. Archibald is the 2008 winner of the Iowahawk Earth Week Cruise-In*.

PAPERS:
Archibald, D. 2006, Solar Cycles 24 and 25 and Predicted Climate Response, Energy and Environment, 17, 29-38. (Publishes denier crap - didn't catch Archibald writing the same paragraph twice)
Archibald, D. 2007, Climate Outlook to 2030, Energy and Environment, 18, 615-619. (Again with the denier crap)
Archibald, D. 2008, Solar Cycle 24: Implications for the United States, International Conference on Climate Change, New York. (not peer reviewed)
Archibald, D. 2011, The Current Solar Minimum and Its Consequences for Climate, p. 277-287, in Easterbrook, D., Evidence-Based Climate Science, Elsevier, ISBN 978-0-12-385956-3

**************************************************************

Yeah, quite the objective climate expert.

* : iowahawk The 2013 Iowahawk Earth Week Cruise-In
The 2013 Iowahawk Earth Week Cruise-In
What, you think I forgot? Rejoice citizen, it's time for the 8th Annual Iowahawk Earth Week Cruise-In - 7 days of peace, love, and carbon-belching horsepower straight from the garages of Iowahawk readers. Together we can combat climate change and celebrate Mother Earth - the Ultimate MILF®!

Want your hoopty featured in the Cruise-In? Spiff it up for a glamour shot, and follow the entry rules below. Best bring your A-game though, because when it comes to carbon production, Iowahawk reader take a backseat to no one!

ENTRY RULES

1. Submit a photo or video of your hooptie (preferably as a link), along with a pithy description, to the email link on the left using the subject line "Cruise In".
2. Eligibility is open to fossil fuel-powered human conveyances (cars, motorcycles, boats, aircraft, spacecraft, etc.) and other devices at my discretion. E.g., an electric blender is not interesting; a blown Hemi-powered blender is.
3. Please submit only those vehicles you personally own, or have stolen. I know many of you have pics of other people's cars, but this exhibition is about taking personal responsibility for the environment.
4. If your vehicle was featured in last year's Cruise-In, please wait 'til next year to re-enter. Let's keep it fresh, people!
5. Submission deadline Sunday, April 28..

Archibald is a ******* millionaire coal roller.

 

[Crick]

Now here is where you accuse me of character assassination for having pulled up a butt ton load of disqualifying FACTS about your SOLE source in response to your blanket condemnation of dozens of so far unidentified PhDs with no information whatsoever supporting that charge. So, take your "ad hominem" and shove it where the sun don't shine.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Now here is where you accuse me of character assassination for having pulled up a butt ton load of disqualifying FACTS about your SOLE source in response to your blanket condemnation of dozens of so far unidentified PhDs with no information whatsoever supporting that charge. So, take your "ad hominem" and shove it where the sun don't shine.

Adhominem attacks one right after another... Its your hallmark!

So tell me moron, why didn't the earth burn up and the oceans become acid during the Cretaceous period?

Abstract
Carbon-dioxide releases associated with a mid-Cretaceous super plume and the emplacement of the Ontong-Java Plateau have been suggested as a principal cause of the mid-Cretaceous global warming. We developed a carbonate-silicate cycle model to quantify the possible climatic effects of these CO2 releases, utilizing four different formulations for the rate of silicate-rock weathering as a function of atmospheric CO2. We find that CO2 emissions resulting from super-plume tectonics could have produced atmospheric CO2 levels from 3.7 to 14.7 times the modern pre-industrial value of 285 ppm. Based on the temperature sensitivity to CO2 increases used in the weathering-rate formulations, this would cause a global warming of from 2.8 to 7.7 degrees C over today's global mean temperature. Altered continental positions and higher sea level may have been contributed about 4.8 degrees C to mid-Cretaceous warming. Thus, the combined effects of paleogeographic changes and super-plume related CO2 emissions could be in the range of 7.6 to 12.5 degrees C, within the 6 to 14 degrees C range previously estimated for mid-Cretaceous warming. CO2 releases from oceanic plateaus alone are unlikely to have been directly responsible for more than 20% of the mid-Cretaceous increase in atmospheric CO2.

The temps were 2-4 deg C higher than today and the CO2 levels went back and forth between 1,700ppm and over 3,000ppm. Yet here we are..no runaway warming and no acid oceans... You alarmist like to feed and eat crap...

The AGW crowd is so disingenuous...

Source

 

[Old Rocks]

Billy Boob, you cretinous ass, have you ever heard of evolution? In a period of slow change to high CO2, life adapts. In a period of very rapid change, most life cannot adapt fast enough, and we have major periods of extinction.

Permian Extinction Article Mass Extinction Information Park Tourism Facts -- National Geographic

Welcome to the Black Triangle," said paleobiologist Cindy Looy as our van slowed to a stop in the gentle hills of the northern Czech Republic, a few miles from the German and Polish borders. The Black Triangle gets its name from the coal burned by nearby power plants. Decades of acid rain generated by power-plant emissions have devastated the region's ecosystems. Yet the treeless hills looked healthy and green.

I tried to hide my surprise. For months I'd been on the trail of the greatest natural disaster in Earth's history. About 250 million years ago, at the end of the Permian period, something killed some 90 percent of the planet's species. Less than 5 percent of the animal species in the seas survived. On land less than a third of the large animal species made it. Nearly all the trees died. Looy had told me that the Black Triangle was the best place today to see what the world would have looked like after the Permian extinction. This didn't look like apocalypse.

We saw the first signs of death as we walked into the hills—hundreds of fallen timbers lay hidden in the undergrowth. A forest once grew here. Half a mile (0.8 kilometers) uphill we found the trunks of a stand of spruce, killed by acid rain. No birds called, no insects hummed. The only sound was the wind through the acid-tolerant weeds.

"The forest that grew here a few decades ago contained dozens of species of plants," said Looy. "Now there are only a few grassy species."

Looy picked up a spruce cone. Pollen from the trees around us might be preserved inside. She believes that the Permian extinction was caused by acid rain following a massive release of volcanic gases. She wants to compare tree pollen from a modern forest killed by acid rain with fossil pollen found in Permian rocks.

 

[mamooth]

before adjustments by the little Marxists at NOAA/NASA.

Cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo ....

Billy, you know why everyone runs from you? It's that load of shit in your pants. Non-crazy people use the toilet.