NightFox
Wildling
- Thread starter
- #181
There kaz goes again, apparently the only way he thinks he can "win" an "argument" is by inaccurately defining the argument of the person that's opposing his, hmmm.. what's that practice called again?The money spent would have all gone back into the stock market, moron. Few companies pay dividends these days anyway.You seem to be very confused about taxation and its effects.Higher taxes always kill investment, moron. The money collected in additional taxes would have been invested. Even a fifth grader can understand that.How does this proposal “kill investment”?Are you referring to the proposed 15% minimum GMT? If so, are you aware that’s significantly LOWER than the current U.S. corporate tax rate? Are you also aware that there is a possibility that U.S. citizens will pay LESS in taxes and retain MORE domestic business activity from this proposal. Again, why do you want to pay taxes to subsidize foreign countries?God damn bro they are making up a number out of thin air, that you must pay
I see all kinds of potential things wrong with it, however I see A LOT more wrong with the current system of exploitation being practiced by large multinational corporations.You don't see anything wrong with this?
Killing investment is a great way to increase jobs. I see why you like it
A tax like this will actually increase investment because corporations would rather spend money on their company than pay it in taxes. Any management that didnt feel like that would not be in place for long.
So the money gets invested in R and D or new plant or refurbs or more people. Its all good as it generates growth in the economy.
Do you understand this or shall I try and simplify it for you ?
NightFox thinks that if money is double taxed and you eliminate one of those taxes that means the money isn't taxed. He won't explain where he thinks his business knowledge comes from. I think he's making it up because he flat out doesn't know what he's talking about
Oh yeah...STRAWMAN.