Recent content by TheDefiantOne

I saying for the 3rd time that you made a claim that you are either unable or unwilling to provide some hard core, documented evidence. Evidently you can read and are not stupid....just insipidly stubborn. Interesting that you initially claimed that Rockwell was part of the combination of race...

1. Funny that no one questions why the rape kit was confiscated by Pagone's office, or why the cops named never had their IA investigation made public. Yeah, Brawley was doing something she wasn't suppose to and lied....but the local DA and such still have some questionable actions. 2. Yep...

Your ignorance (you don't know who Rockwell is) is no defense for your dubious claims (Sharpton's largesse exceeds all 3 combined.. I asked for some numbers, yet all you can provide is more rhetoric.

Ahh, but remember the charge was valid by Wisconsin law. I proved that with the link. Kyle Rittenhouse.....use of force expert! Again, can you provide the link to the story that reports them dropping this particular charge?

that's not what Wisconsin law says. Look at section 948.60 https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/948/55 Why they would drop this charge is beyond me. Can you provide the link?

You made the accusation ... the burden of proof is on you.

Only to the Duke, Rockwell and Storm Front crowd.

as opposed to Duke, rockwell, storm front? Exactly what is the provable amount of "big bucks" you're citing?

Geez, that old chestnut is all you've got?

Hmm, what's the political/social mindsets of all the other folk in the gallery?

Really? That's dumb, being that he is clearly in violation of that part of the law. What are they replacing it with?

Does your logic apply to the Jan. 6th yahoos?

This is true ... but they didn't arrest or detain him either.

Wisconsin law begs to differ. Note Section 948.60 https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/948/55

January 6th.