Recent content by gslack

Liar... The same mod who tried to do it last time based on your whine..You know it, I know it.. It's okay punk, you can play pretend Finn here all you want, you have moms approval and oversight. Later Finnish Fraud..

You can play pretend all you want crybaby, I'm done here.. That's twice I got penalized for your nonsense and both by the same mod... Think I'm going to take you crying to mommy about anyone who questions your BS lies or behavior? No afraid not, you just bragged about it in a neg-rep comment as...

LOL, yes Ian explained that deviation from a 30 year mean, no matter from what time period within a larger 180 year period, is a perfectly fine way to call a year a "record".. The fact that in that 180years we had variable temps and no 30 year period would be exactly like another, doesn't...

No what I realize is you are a habitual save-ass... You latch on to anybody when it suits your needs.. Like your latest with PMZ... You run from every arguement when you can't throw numbers from spencer at it... You regurgitate luke-warmer nonsense, and pretend it solves all problems.. You don't...

Finnish Fraud -- there is a third kind.. The kind who cries incessantly and complains about everyone who doesn't conform to his liking...

Nope sorry, it doesn't help me... You are a proxy monkey.. And please report away crybaby.. No adjustment needed. I still think you're A bs artist...

LOL, the lackwit that made you cry... ROFL LOL, two coals warmer on the side facing one another is an example of reflection, and the fact the other sides are cooling at a faster rate because there isn't another heat source on those sides... In other words, it's not that the facing sides are...

Notice how when Ian and now flac, get stuck they try and claim "stops radiating, in that direction, decides not toradiate in that directions, et, so on" Doesn't matter how manny times we explain, how much of their OWN sources material, text books, and so on say the exact same thing, if spencer...

Finnish fraud knows all... Except finnish geography... And how to quote people honestly... And how NOT to be a crybaby in a web forum... Oh and how to act with adults... And just about anything at all about science or the scientific method.. And we can add New Zealand politics as well.... But...

LOL, so your defense of the fact is to point other people may have done a similar thing? To you warmers that may be a good defense but in the real world it's a diversion, and a poor one at that...

I'm not surprised. It'sthe same kinof thing an experienced boxer uses in a fight. No matter how hurt you may be, keep fighting and do not aknowledge you're nose is gone... They are ike the boxer who was out on his feet 10 seconds ago and suddenly can't believe the fight was stopped...

Quiet socko, you're not even worth a thoughtful response anymore. Everyone here knows it. Ian coddles you because it suits his needs at this time. he's a save-ass in warmer denial right now.. he will come into the fold of true warmer very soon...

The point he was making, rather obviously, is that a forecast or prediction should remain simply that, and not be claimed as a statement of certain fact.

Saigon - Quit being a douchebag... Your refusal to quote the posts you respond to only draws attention to your dishonest nature... And there was no running, there was nothing to even run from.. What did you do? Nothing but claim you have more such information. You didn't post it, you didn't...

Translation = So what if your OP was a bias piece of PR, you have more bias pieces from other similarly bias sources... An overwhelming amount of tainted evidence, is still tainted evidence, and not proof of anything... I would expect a self-proclaimed JOURNALIST would know this, even a...