no, it is far from the "only way", that is just a way to eliminate all other forms of thinking about the matter, which is obviously the goal here...so what did he write/say about his politics?
that you are demanding folks allow you to dictate what constitutes evidence when they have seen this...
this has more to do with his party affiliation and media silence on the matter than anything else, if he switches sides tonight, by morning you will have more evidence against him than you would hitler himself.
sorry, has to be the same rules for everyone
pretty much how he is putting one over...
the women say differently, who do you listen to?
white liberals in the party have been trying to replace robert byrd since he passed away, may as well be this guy as it will essentially be someone of this nature.
It was your pretending the observation wasn't in "doubt" instead of asking for evidence to disprove it as that would have been a cinch...your slipping in and out of character as walter may be causing this croc
it means no such thing...if you have one ceo 86 years old and the rest are 55 that means you have one ceo who is over 56 and 30 who are younger [and not one that is actually 56]...so not quite half eh
well then lets get you untangled here, the courts are certainly not "conservative message boards"...I'm searching for an answer as to why you would be so honest about such a thing and the only thing that makes sense is... "MISTAKE" :abgg2q.jpg: